Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T15:52:48.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological Innovation Research in China and India: A Bibliometric Analysis for the Period 1991–2015

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2017

Debabrata Chatterjee  and
Sreevas Sahasranamam Open the ORCID record for Sreevas Sahasranamam [Opens in a new window]
Debabrata Chatterjee
Affiliation:
Indian Institute of ManagementKozhikode, India
Sreevas Sahasranamam*
Affiliation:
University of Strathclyde, UK
*
Corresponding author: Sreevas Sahasranamam (mailsreevas@gmail.com)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although a substantial literature on the management of technological innovation exists, several scholars argue that much of this research has been rooted in Western contexts, where key assumptions are very different from those in emerging economies. Building on this viewpoint, we investigate the current state of knowledge on technological innovation in two of the largest and fastest growing emerging economies: China and India. We undertook a bibliometric analysis of author keywords and combined different quantitative approaches – frequency analysis, cluster analysis, and co-word analysis – to review 162 articles on technological innovation published about China and India for the period 1991–2015. From the analyses, the trends in technological innovation research in the two countries and the dominant themes of discussion were identified. These themes were further classified into eight sub-themes. Our key findings indicate a near absence of research on the management of technological innovation based on India, limited volume of research on indigenous aspects of innovation, and a lack of theory-building based on these countries’ contexts. Several suggestions for future research are offered based on the gaps identified.

摘要:

摘要:

尽管存在大量有关技术创新管理的文献, 几位学者认为这些研究多数根植于西方情境, 而新兴经济体与西方情境在关键假定上非常不同。在这个观点的基础上, 我们探讨了两个体量最大、增长最快的新型经济体—中国和印度—的技术创新知识的现状。我们针对作者提供的关键词进行文献计量分析, 并结合频率分析、聚类分析和共词分析等不同的定量方法, 回顾了1991-2015期间发表的162篇关于中国和印度技术创新的文章。通过这些分析, 我们发现了两个国家技术创新研究的趋势以及所讨论的重要主题, 并进一步将这些主题分为八个子主题。我们的主要发现表明, 印度关于技术创新的研究几近匮乏, 有关创新的本土方面的研究非常少, 也缺少在中国和印度两个情境下建立理论的研究。根据所发现的这些空白, 我们给未来的研究提出了几个建议。

यद्यपि तकनीकी नवाचार पर काफी शोध साहित्य उपलब्ध है, कई विद्वानों का यह मत है की अधिकतर शोध पाश्चात्य सन्दर्भ पर केंद्रित हैं जहां की धारणाएं अर्थव्यवस्थाओं से बहुत भिन्न हैं. इस विचार के आधार पर हमने विश्व की तीव्रतम दर पर विकसित हो रही दो अर्थव्यवस्थाओं - चीन एवं भारत के वर्तमान में तकनीकी नवाचार के ज्ञान का अनुसंधान किया है. हमने शोधकर्ता सूचक शब्दों का ग्रंथ-मापीय (बिब्लियोमेट्रिक) अन्वेषण किया और आवृत्ति विश्लेषण, गुल्म विश्लेषण, व सह-शब्द विश्लेषण जैसी संख्यात्मक परिपाटियों का प्रयोग व भारत के तकनीकी नवाचार पर 1991 से 2015 के बीच छपे 162 शोधपत्रों का समीक्षण किया. इस विश्लेषण से दोनों देशों में तकनीकी नवाचार की प्रचलित प्रबल विषय वस्तु पहचानी गयी. इन विषयवस्तुओं को पुनः आठ उप-विषयवस्तुओं में विभक्त किया गया. हमारे अनुसंधान के निष्कर्ष भारत में तकनीकी नवाचार प्रबंधन के शून्यमनस्कता के संकेत देते हैं. साथ ही हमारे परिणाम नवाचार के स्वदेशीय पहलुओं पर सीमित शोध, और इन देशों के सन्दर्भ में सिद्धांत-निर्माण के अभाव को दर्शाते हैं. हमने भविष्य में शोध के लिए कई सुझाव दिए हैं.

Sumário:

SUMÁRIO:

Embora exista uma literatura substancial sobre o gerenciamento da inovação tecnológica, vários estudiosos argumentam que grande parte dessa pesquisa foi enraizada em contextos ocidentais, em que premissas fundamentais são muito diferentes daquelas de economias emergentes. Com base neste ponto de vista, investigamos o estado atual do conhecimento sobre inovação tecnológica em duas das economias emergentes maiores e de mais rápido crescimento: China e Índia. Realizamos uma análise bibliométrica das palavras-chave do autor e combinamos diferentes abordagens quantitativas - análise de frequência, análise de cluster e análise de palavras - para revisar 162 artigos sobre inovação tecnológica publicados sobre a China e a Índia no período 1991–2015. A partir das análises, foram identificadas as tendências da pesquisa em inovação tecnológica nos dois países e os temas dominantes de discussão. Esses temas foram posteriormente classificados em oito subtemas. Nossas principais descobertas indicam uma quase ausência de pesquisa sobre a gestão da inovação tecnológica baseada na Índia, volume limitado de pesquisas sobre os aspectos naturais da inovação e uma falta de construção de teoria com base nos contextos desses países. Várias sugestões para pesquisas futuras são oferecidas com base nas lacunas identificadas.

Аннотация:

АННОТАЦИЯ:

Несмотря на то, что существует значительная научная литература по управлению технологическими инновациями, некоторые ученые утверждают, что большая часть этих исследований уходит корнями в западные страны, где ключевые предпосылки сильно отличаются от тех, которые существуют в странах с развивающимся рынком. Отталкиваясь от этой точки зрения, мы изучаем текущее состояние знаний о технологических инновациях в двух крупнейших и наиболее быстро растущих странах: Китае и Индии. Мы провели библиометрический анализ ключевых слов с помощью разных количественных методов исследования – частотного анализа, кластерного анализа и морфологического анализа – для обзора 162 статей о технологических инновациях, которые были опубликованы о Китае и Индии в период 1991–2015 годов. На основании нашего анализа, мы определили тенденции в исследованиях технологических инноваций и главные темы для обсуждения в этих двух странах. Эти темы были далее разделены на восемь подтем. Наши ключевые выводы свидетельствуют о почти полном отсутствии исследований по управлению технологическими инновациями в Индии, об ограниченном объеме исследований, посвященных исконным аспектам инноваций, а также об отсутствии теории, которая была бы основана на контексте этих стран. На основе выявленных пробелов, делается несколько предложений для направления будущих исследований.

Resumen:

RESUMEN:

Aunque existe una literatura sustancial en la gestión de la innovación tecnológica, muchos académicos sostienen que mucha parte de esta investigación ha tenido sus raíces en los contextos occidentales donde los supuestos clave son muy diferentes a los de las economías emergentes. Partiendo de este punto de vista, investigamos el estado actual del conocimiento sobre la innovación tecnológica en dos de las más grandes y de más rápido crecimiento economías emergentes: China e India. Realizamos un análisis bibliométrico de las palabras clave de los autores y combinamos diferentes enfoques cuantitativos -análisis de frecuencia, análisis de clúster, y análisis de recurrencia de palabras- para revisar 162 artículos sobre innovación tecnológica publicados sobre China e India en el período 1991–2015. A partir de los análisis, las tendencias en la investigación sobre innovación tecnológica en los países y los temas dominantes de la discusión fueron identificados. Estos temas fueron clasificados además en ocho sub-temas. Nuestros hallazgos clave indican una casi ausencia en investigación sobre la gestión de innovación tecnológica basada en China, un limitado volumen de investigación en aspectos autóctonos de innovación, y una falta de construcción teórica con base en los contextos de estos países. Se ofrecen varias sugerencias para futuras investigaciones basadas en las brechas identificadas.

Keywords

bibliometric analysisChinacluster analysisIndiatechnological innovation文献计量分析中国聚类分析印度技术创新ग्रंथ-मापीय अन्वेषणचीनगुल्म विश्लेषणभारततकनीकी नवाचारAnálise bibliométricaChinaanálise de clusterÍndiainovação tecnológicaбиблиометрический анализКитайкластерный анализИндиятехнологические инновацииanálisis bibliométricoChinaanálisis de clústerIndiainnovación tecnológica
Type
Articles
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 179 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Acs, Z., & Szerb, L. 2007. Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28 (2): 109–122.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. K. 2001. University-to-industry knowledge transfer: Literature review and unanswered questions. International Journal of Management Reviews, 3 (4): 285–302.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A., & Sahasranamam, S. 2016. Corporate social entrepreneurship in India. South Asian Journal of Global Business Research, 5 (2): 214–233.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G. 2000. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45 (3): 425–455.Google Scholar
Ahuja, G., Lampert, C. M., & Tandon, V. 2008. Moving beyond Schumpeter: Management research on the determinants of technological innovation. The Academy of Management Annals, 2 (1): 1–98.Google Scholar
Anadón, L. D. 2012. Missions-oriented R&D institutions in energy between 2000 and 2010: A comparative analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Research Policy, 41 (10): 1742–1756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angeli, F., & Grimaldi, R. 2010. Leveraging offshoring: The identification of new business opportunities in international settings. Industry & Innovation, 17 (4): 393–413.Google Scholar
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. 1990. Complementarity and external linkages–The strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. Journal of Industrial Economics, 38 (4): 361–379.Google Scholar
Ashwin, A. S., Krishnan, R. T., & George, R. 2015. Family firms in India: Family involvement, innovation and agency and stewardship behaviors. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32 (4): 869–900.Google Scholar
Audretsch, D. B., Bönte, W., & Tamvada, J. P. 2013. Religion, social class, and entrepreneurial choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 28 (6): 774–789.Google Scholar
Augier, M., Guo, J., & Rowen, H. 2016. The Needham Puzzle reconsidered: Organizations, organizing, and innovation in China. Management and Organization Review, 12 (1): 5–24.Google Scholar
Bardhan, A., & Kroll, C. 2006. Competitiveness and an emerging sector: The Russian software industry and its global linkages. Industry and Innovation, 13 (1): 69–95.Google Scholar
Basalla, G. 1967. The spread of Western science. Science, 156 (3775): 611–622.Google Scholar
Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. 2001. A multidimensional model of venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (2): 292–303.Google Scholar
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. 2006. Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003. Technovation, 26 (5): 644–664.Google Scholar
Bertrand, O., & Mol, M. J. 2013. The antecedents and innovation effects of domestic and offshore R&D outsourcing: The contingent impact of cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Strategic Management Journal, 34 (6): 751–760.Google Scholar
Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., van Tilburg, A., & van de Bunt, G. G. 2010. How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India's handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25 (3): 245–260.Google Scholar
Bhave, M. 1994. A process model of entrepreneurial creation. Journal of Business Venturing, 9 (3): 223–242.Google Scholar
Bouet, D. 2015. A study of intellectual property protection policies and innovation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry and beyond. Technovation, 38: 31–41.Google Scholar
Bramwell, A., & Wolfe, D. A. 2008. Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37 (8): 1175–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brem, A., & Freitag, F. 2015. Internationalisation of new product development and research & development: Results from a multiple case study on companies with innovation processes in Germany and India. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (1): 1550010.Google Scholar
Briggs, J. 2005. The use of indigenous knowledge in development: problems and challenges. Progress in Development Studies, 5: 99–114.Google Scholar
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 20 (2): 343–378.Google Scholar
Bryson, J., & Monnoyer, M. 2004. Understanding the relationship between services and innovation: The RESER review of the European service literature on innovation, 2002. Service Industries Journal, 24 (1): 205–222.Google Scholar
Burgelman, R. 1983. A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28 (2): 223–244.Google Scholar
Caldera, A., & Debande, O. 2010. Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39 (9): 1160–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, C. 2004. China's scientific elite. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cao, C., Simon, D. F., & Suttmeier, R. P. 2009. Commentary – China's innovation challenge. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 11 (2): 253–259.Google Scholar
Chadha, A., & Oriani, R. 2010. R&D market value under weak intellectual property rights protection: The case of India. Scientometrics, 82 (1): 59–74.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, C., & Basu, P. 2002. Foreign direct investment and growth in India: A cointegration approach. Applied Economics, 34 (9): 1061–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaminade, C., Castellani, D., & Plechero, M. 2014. The emergence of China and India as new innovation power houses – Threat or opportunity. Stockholm: Entreprenörskapforum.Google Scholar
Chan-Serafin, S., Brief, A. P., & George, J. M. 2013. Perspective–How does religion matter and why? Religion and the organizational sciences. Organization Science, 24 (5): 1585–1600.Google Scholar
Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. 2004. The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: A comparative analysis. Technovation, 24 (7): 529–539.Google Scholar
Chang, Y.-C., Yang, P. Y., & Chen, M.-H. 2009. The determinants of academic research commercial performance: Towards an organizational ambidexterity perspective. Research Policy, 38 (6): 936–946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, D., & Sahasranamam, S. 2014. Trends in innovation management research in India – An analysis of publications for the period 1991–2013. Current Science, 107 (11): 1800–1805.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, D., & Sankaran, B. 2015. Commercializing academic research in emerging economies: Do organizational identities matter? Science and Public Policy, 42 (5): 599–613.Google Scholar
Chaturvedi, S., Kalam, A. P. J. A., Ladikas, M., Lifeng, G., & Srinivas, K. R. 2014. The living tree: Traditional medicine and public health in China and India. New Delhi: Academic Foundation.Google Scholar
Chen, R. X. 1996. Technological expansion: The interaction between diversification strategy and organizational capability. Journal of Management Studies, 33 (5): 649–666.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Reger, G. 2006. The role of technology in the investment of German firms in China. Technovation, 26 (3): 407–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., & West, J. 2006. Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chittoor, R., & Ray, S. 2007. Internationalization paths of Indian pharmaceutical firms–A strategic group analysis. Journal of International Management, 13 (3): 338–355.Google Scholar
Chittoor, R., Ray, S., Aulakh, P. S., & Sarkar, M. B. 2008. Strategic responses to institutional changes: ‘Indigenous growth’ model of the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Management, 14 (3): 252–269.Google Scholar
Chittoor, R., Sarkar, M. B., Ray, S., & Aulakh, P. S. 2009. Third-world copycats to emerging multinationals: Institutional changes and organizational transformation in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Organization Science, 20 (1): 187–205.Google Scholar
Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., & Williams, C. 2011. Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China. Research Policy, 40 (3): 441–452.Google Scholar
Chung, S. 2002. Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems. Technovation, 22 (8): 485–491.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. 1989. Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In Schmalensee, R. & Willig, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization: 1059–1107. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1): 128–152.Google Scholar
Cooke, P. 2002. Regional innovation systems. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27 (1): 133–145.Google Scholar
Cornell University, INSEAD, & WIPO. 2016. The Global Innovation Index 2016: Winning with global inovation. Fontainebleau, Ithaca, and Geneva.Google Scholar
Coulter, N., Monarch, I., & Konda, S. 1998. Software engineering as seen through its research literature: A study in co-word analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49: 1206–1223.Google Scholar
Datta, P. B., & Gailey, R. 2012. Empowering women through social entrepreneurship: Case study of a women's cooperative in India. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (3): 569–587.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. 2003. The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18 (3): 301–331.Google Scholar
Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. 2001. Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25 (4): 81–100.Google Scholar
De Clercq, D., Danis, W. M., & Dakhli, M. 2010. The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19 (1): 85–101.Google Scholar
De Meyer, A. 2001. Technology transfer into China: European Management Journal, 19 (2): 140–144.Google Scholar
Deng, Z., Hofman, P. S., & Newman, A. 2012. Ownership concentration and product innovation in Chinese private SMEs. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30 (3): 717–734.Google Scholar
Dhandapani, K., Upadhyayula, R., & Karna, A. 2015. Why do firms locate across multiple clusters? Cluster density, capabilities and ethnic ties. Industry and Innovation, 22 (4): 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Minin, A., Zhang, J., & Gammeltoft, P. 2012. Chinese foreign direct investment in R&D in Europe: A new model of R&D internationalization? European Management Journal, 30 (3): 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dosi, G., Marengo, L., & Pasquali, C. 2006. How much should society fuel the greed of innovators? On the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. Research Policy, 35 (8): 1110–1121.Google Scholar
Doutriaux, J. 2003. University-industry linkages and the development of knowledge clusters in Canada. Local Economy, 18 (1): 63–79.Google Scholar
Drori, G. S., Jang, S. Y., & Meyer, J. W. 2006. Sources of rationalized governance: Cross-national longitudinal analyses 1985–2002. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51 (2): 205–229.Google Scholar
Du, X. 2013. Does religion matter to owner-manager agency costs? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 118 (2): 319–347.Google Scholar
Du, X., Jian, W., Zeng, Q., & Du, Y. 2014. Corporate environmental responsibility in polluting industries: Does religion matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 124 (3): 485–507.Google Scholar
Duda, R. O., Hart, P. E., & Stork, D. G. 2001. Pattern classification and scene analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ernst, H., Kahle, H. N., Dubiel, A., Prabhu, J., & Subramaniam, M. 2015. The antecedents and consequences of affordable value innovations for emerging markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32 (1): 65–79.Google Scholar
Etkin, N. L., & Elisabetsky, E. 2005. Seeking a transdisciplinary and culturally germane science: The future of ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 100 (1–2): 23–26.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H. 2011. Normative change in science and the birth of the Triple Helix. Social Science Information, 50 (3–4): 549–568.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. 2000. The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29 (2): 109–123.Google Scholar
Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. R. C. 2000. The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29 (2): 313–330.Google Scholar
Feinberg, S., & Majumdar, S. 2001. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment in the Indian pharmaceutical industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3): 421–437.Google Scholar
Ferner, A., & Quintanilla, J. 1998. Multinationals, national business systems and HRM: The enduring influence of national identity or a process of ‘Anglo-Saxonization’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 9 (4): 710–731.Google Scholar
Fisch, C., Block, J., & Sandner, P. 2016. Chinese university patents: quantity, quality, and the role of subsidy programs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41 (1): 60–84.Google Scholar
Fleming, L. 2001. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47 (1): 117–132.Google Scholar
Fleming, L., & Sorenson, O. 2004. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management Journal, 25: 909–928.Google Scholar
Franke, N., & Shah, S. 2003. How communities support innovative activities: An exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users. Research Policy, 32 (1): 157–178.Google Scholar
Frenkel, M. 2008. The multinational corporation as a third space: Rethinking international management discourse on knowledge transfer through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33 (4): 924–942.Google Scholar
Fuller, S. 1999. Governance of science: Ideology and the future of the open society. United Kingdom: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar
Furrer, O., Thomas, H., & Goussevskaia, A. 2008. The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10 (1): 1–23.Google Scholar
Galindo, M. Á., & Méndez-Picazo, M. T. 2013. Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Management Decision, 51 (3): 501–514.Google Scholar
Galindo, M. Á., & Méndez, M. T. 2014. Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and innovation: Are feedback effects at work? Journal of Business Research, 67 (5): 825–829.Google Scholar
Gatignon, H., Tushman, M. L., Smith, W., & Anderson, P. 2002. A structural approach to assessing innovation: Construct development of innovation locus, type, and characteristics. Management Science, 48 (9): 1103–1122.Google Scholar
George, G., McGahan, A. M., & Prabhu, J. 2012. Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 49 (4): 661–683.Google Scholar
Godinho, M. M., & Ferreira, V. 2012. Analyzing the evidence of an IPR take-off in China and India. Research Policy, 41 (3): 499–511.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, B., & Henrekson, M. 2003. Bottom-up versus top-down policies towards the commercialization of university intellectual property. Research Policy, 32 (4): 639–658.Google Scholar
Govindarajan, V. 2012. A reverse-innovation playbook. Harvard Business Review, 90 (4): 120–124.Google Scholar
Goxe, F. 2012. Innovation with ‘Chinese’ characteristics? Reflecting on the implications of an ethnic-based paradigm of management and innovation. Prometheus, 30 (2): 155–168.Google Scholar
Grant, R. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122.Google Scholar
Green, D., & Raygorodetsky, G. 2010. Indigenous knowledge of a changing climate. Climatic Change, 100 (2): 239–242.Google Scholar
Gross, C. 2013. The growth of China's technology transfer industry over the next decade: Implications for global markets. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (5): 716–747.Google Scholar
Gu, S. 2009. The emergence and development of the vegetable sector in China. Industry & Innovation, 16 (4–5): 499–524.Google Scholar
Guan, J. C., Yam, R. C. M., Tang, E. P. Y., & Lau, A. K. W. 2009. Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38 (5): 802–812.Google Scholar
Guennif, S., & Ramani, S. V. 2012. Explaining divergence in catching-up in pharma between India and Brazil using the NSI framework. Research Policy, 41 (2): 430–441.Google Scholar
Guo, C., & Miller, J. K. 2010. Guanxi dynamics and entrepreneurial firm creation and development in China. Management and Organization Review, 6 (2): 267–291.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. 1996. The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (4): 659–684.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. 1984. Upper echelons – The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9 (2): 193–206.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. 1999. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (1): 82–111.Google Scholar
Hansen, S. A., & VanFleet, J. W. 2003. Traditional knowledge and intellectual property: A handbook on issues and options for traditional knowledge holders in protecting their intellectual property and maintaining biological diversity. Washington DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
He, Y., Ding, X., & Yang, K. 2014. Unpacking the relationships between conflicts and team innovation: Empirical evidence from China. Management Decision, 52 (8): 1533–1548.Google Scholar
Heilmann, S. 2016. April 24. Here's how China is building the car of the future. Fortune.Google Scholar
Hempel, P. S., & Sue-Chan, C. 2010. Culture and the assessment of creativity. Management and Organization Review, 6 (3): 415–435.Google Scholar
Hendry, C., & Brown, J. 2006. Organizational networking in UK biotechnology clusters. British Journal of Management, 17 (1): 55–73.Google Scholar
Hessels, J., & van Stel, A. 2011. Entrepreneurship, export orientation, and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 37 (2): 255–268.Google Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. 1997. International diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (4): 767–798.Google Scholar
Hoffman, K., Parejo, M., Bessant, J., & Perren, L. 1998. Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: A literature review. Technovation, 18 (1): 39–55.Google Scholar
Hsu, P.-H., Wang, C., & Wu, C. 2013. Banking systems, innovations, intellectual property protections, and financial markets: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 66 (12): 2390–2396.Google Scholar
Hu, A. G. 2010. Propensity to patent, competition and China's foreign patenting surge. Research Policy, 39 (7): 985–993.Google Scholar
Huang, Y., Audretsch, D. B., & Hewitt, M. 2012. Chinese technology transfer policy: The case of the national independent innovation demonstration zone of East Lake. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (6): 828–835.Google Scholar
Huggins, R. 2008. The evolution of knowledge clusters: Progress and policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 22 (4): 277–289.Google Scholar
Hutton, R. 2013. Jewels in the crown: How Tata of India transformed Britain's Jaguar and Land Rover (1st ed.). London: Elliott & Thompson.Google Scholar
IANS. 2015. January 23. India is a world leader in space technology. Firstpost.Google Scholar
Immelt, J. R., Govindarajan, V., & Trimble, C. 2009. How GE is disrupting itself. Harvard Business Review, 87 (10): 56–65.Google Scholar
Indian National Science Academy. 2001. Atomic energy in India. Pursuit and Promotion of Science: The Indian Experience: 294–303. New Delhi: Indian National Science Academy.Google Scholar
Intellicap. 2012. On the path to sustainability and scale: A study of India's social enterprise landscape. Mumbai.Google Scholar
Iturriaga, F. L., & Cruz, N. M. 2008. Antecedents of corporate spin-offs in Spain: A resource-based approach. Research Policy, 37 (6): 1047–1056.Google Scholar
Jeppesen, L. B., & Frederiksen, L. 2006. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organization Science, 17 (1): 45–63.Google Scholar
Jiang, L. (Alice), Waller, D. S., & Cai, S. 2013. Does ownership type matter for innovation? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 66 (12): 2473–2478.Google Scholar
Kafouros, M., Wang, C., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhang, M. 2015. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions. Research Policy, 44 (3): 803–817.Google Scholar
Keillor, B. D., & Hult, G. T. M. 1999. A five-country study of national identity: Implications for international marketing research and practice. International Marketing Review, 16 (1): 65–84.Google Scholar
Kenney, M., & Von Burg, U. 1999. Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: Industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8 (1): 67–103.Google Scholar
Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. 2012. The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14 (4): 367–390.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2000. Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. The Journal of Finance, 55 (2): 867–891.Google Scholar
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. G. 2006. Emerging giants: Building world-class companies in developing countries. Harvard Business Review, 84 (10).Google Scholar
Kipping, M., Engwall, L., & Üsdiken, B. 2008. Preface: The transfer of management knowledge to peripheral countries. International Studies of Management & Organization, 38 (4): 3–16.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. 1988. Joint ventures: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 9: 319–332.Google Scholar
Kristinsson, K., & Rao, R. 2008. Interactive learning or technology transfer as a way to catch up? Analysing the wind energy industry in Denmark and India. Industry and Innovation, 15 (3): 297–320.Google Scholar
Kriz, A. 2010. The challenge to rekindle China's innovative spirit. Management Decision, 48 (4): 541–561.Google Scholar
Kroll, H., & Liefner, I. 2008. Spin-off enterprises as a means of technology commercialisation in a transforming economy – Evidence from three universities in China. Technovation, 28 (5): 298–313.Google Scholar
Kumar, N. 2003. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: Experiences of Asian countries. Economic and Political Weekly, 38 (3): 209–226.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., & Aggarwal, A. 2005. Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: A quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. Research Policy, 34 (4): 441–460.Google Scholar
Kumar, N., & Puranam, P. 2012. India inside: The emerging innovation challenge to the West. Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, R. S., & Subrahmanya, M. B. 2010. Influence of subcontracting on innovation and economic performance of SMEs in Indian automobile industry. Technovation, 30 (11–12): 558–569.Google Scholar
Lai, W.-H., & Chang, P.-L. 2010. Corporate motivation and performance in R&D alliances. Journal of Business Research, 63 (5): 490–496.Google Scholar
Lam, A. 2000. Tacit knowledge, organizational learning and innovation: A societal perspective. Organization Studies, 21: 487–513.Google Scholar
Lam, A. 2010. From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’?: Academic scientists in fuzzy university-industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40 (2): 307–340.Google Scholar
Lamin, A., & Livanis, G. 2013. Agglomeration, catch-up and the liability of foreignness in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 44 (6): 579–606.Google Scholar
Lan, P., & Young, S. 1996. International technology transfer examined at technology component level: A case study in China. Technovation, 16 (6): 277–286.Google Scholar
Landes, D. 1998. The wealth and poverty of nations: Why some are so rich and some so poor. New York: W.W.Norton.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W. 2004. Indigenous innovation and economic development: Lessons from China's leap into the information age. Industry & Innovation, 11 (4): 273–297.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Jee, M., & Eun, J.-H. 2011. Assessing China's economic catch-up at the firm level and beyond: Washington Consensus, East Asian Consensus and the Beijing Model. Industry & Innovation, 18 (5): 487–507.Google Scholar
Lerner, J., & Tirole, J. 2002. Some simple economics of open source. Journal of Industrial Economics, 50 (2): 197–234.Google Scholar
Leung, R. C. 2013. Networks as sponges: International collaboration for developing nanomedicine in China. Research Policy, 42 (1): 211–219.Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. 1989. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy, 18: 209–223.Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. 1996. Emergence of a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23 (5): 279–286.Google Scholar
Li, F., Miao, Y., & Yang, C. 2015. How do alumni faculty behave in research collaboration? An analysis of Chang Jiang Scholars in China. Research Policy, 44 (2): 438–450.Google Scholar
Li, J., Sutherland, D., Ning, L., & Wang, Y. 2014. Firm ownership, industrial structure, and regional innovation performance in China's provinces. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26 (9): 1001–1022.Google Scholar
Li, J., & Xie, Z. 2011. Global R&D strategies in an emerging economy: The development and protection of technological competencies. European Management Review, 8 (3): 153–164.Google Scholar
Liang, Q., Li, X., Yang, X., Lin, D., & Zheng, D. 2012. How does family involvement affect innovation in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30 (3): 677–695.Google Scholar
Liefner, I., & Schiller, D. 2008. Academic capabilities in developing countries – A conceptual framework with empirical illustrations from Thailand. Research Policy, 37 (2): 276–293.Google Scholar
Lim, C., Han, S., & Ito, H. 2013. Capability building through innovation for unserved lower end mega markets. Technovation, 33 (12): 391–404.Google Scholar
Lin, J. 2013. Why are Chinese partners passive innovators? National culture, organisation processes and innovation propensity in cross-border alliances. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 17 (4/5/6): 271–283.Google Scholar
Liu, F., Simon, D. F., Sun, Y., & Cao, C. 2011. China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory. Research Policy, 40 (7): 917–931.Google Scholar
Liu, M., & Chen, S.-H. 2012. MNCs’ offshore R&D networks in host country's regional innovation system: The case of Taiwan-based firms in China. Research Policy, 41 (6): 1107–1120.Google Scholar
Liu, X., & Wu, X. 2011. Technology embeddedness, innovation differentiation strategies and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Innovation: Management, Policy and Practice, 13 (1): 20–35.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Woywode, M., & Xing, Y. 2012. High technology start-up innovation and the role of guanxi: An explorative study in China from an institutional perspective. Prometheus, 30 (2): 211–229.Google Scholar
Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H., Sin, L. Y., Alan, C. B., Chow, R. P., & Lee, J. S. 2008. The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts. Journal of International Business Studies, 39 (4): 589–612.Google Scholar
Lundvall, B. 1999. National business systems and national systems of innovation. International Studies of Management & Organization, 29 (2): 60–77.Google Scholar
Madanmohan, T., Kumar, U., & Kumar, V. 2004. Import-led technological capability: A comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms. Technovation, 24 (12): 979–993.Google Scholar
Mair, J., & Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (5): 419–435.Google Scholar
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. 2012. Building inclusive markets in rural Bangladesh: How intermediaries work institutional voids. Academy of Management Journal, 55 (4): 819–850.Google Scholar
McEachern, W. A., & Romeo, A. A. 1978. Stockholder control, uncertainty and allocation of resources to research and development. Journal of Industrial Economics, 26 (4): 349–361.Google Scholar
McMahon, D., & Thorsteinsdóttir, H. 2013. Pursuing endogenous high-tech innovation in developing countries: A look at regenerative medicine innovation in Brazil, China and India. Research Policy, 42 (4): 965–974.Google Scholar
Mehta, A., Herron, P., Motoyama, Y., & Appelbaum, R. 2012. Globalization and de-globalization in nanotechnology research: The role of China. Scientometrics, 93 (2): 439–458.Google Scholar
Midgley, D. F., Morrison, P. D., & Roberts, J. H. 1992. The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion-processes. Research Policy, 21 (6): 533–552.Google Scholar
Miller, C. R., Richard, B., & Arora, S. 2011. Alternate signs of life: The growth of biotechnology industries in Shanghai and Bangalore. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78 (4): 565–574.Google Scholar
Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., Mcmullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. 2012. Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37 (4): 616–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, G. W., & Cooper, M. C. 1985. An examination of procedures for determining the number of clusters in a dataset. Psychometrika, 50: 159–179.Google Scholar
Mohan, V. 2015. June 25. Greenhouse gases: India fourth biggest emitter, but lags far behind top three. The Times of India.Google Scholar
Monsen, E., Mahagaonkar, P., & Dienes, C. 2012. Entrepreneurship in India: The question of occupational transition. Small Business Economics, 39 (2): 359–382.Google Scholar
Morandi, V. 2013. The management of industry–university joint research projects: How do partners coordinate and control R&D activities? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (2): 69–92.Google Scholar
Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. 2010. Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation. Boston: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Motohashi, K., & Yuan, Y. 2010. Productivity impact of technology spillover from multinationals to local firms: Comparing China's automobile and electronics industries. Research Policy, 39 (6): 790–798.Google Scholar
Mouly, V., & Sankaran, J. 1999. R&D funding in India: An empirical study. Prometheus, 17 (1): 21–31.Google Scholar
Mowery, D. C. 1998. The changing structure of the US national innovation system: Implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy. Research Policy, 27 (6): 639–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mu, Q., & Lee, K. 2005. Knowledge diffusion, market segmentation and technological catch-up: The case of the telecommunication industry in China. Research Policy, 34 (6): 759–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mytelka, L. K. 2006. Pathways and policies to (bio) pharmaceutical innovation systems in developing countries. Industry & Innovation, 13 (4): 415–435.Google Scholar
Nag, R., Hambrick, D., & Chen, M. 2007. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (9): 935–955.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2): 242–266.Google Scholar
Nair, A., Guldiken, O., Fainshmidt, S., & Pezeshkan, A. 2015. Innovation in India: A review of past research and future directions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32 (4): 925–958.Google Scholar
Nakata, C., & Weidner, K. 2012. Enhancing new product adoption at the base of the pyramid: A contextualized model. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (1): 21–32.Google Scholar
Narayanan, K., & Bhat, S. 2009. Technology sourcing and its determinants: A study of Basic Chemical industry in India. Technovation, 29 (8): 562–573.Google Scholar
Narayanan, K., & Bhat, S. 2011. Technology sourcing and outward FDI: A study of IT industry in India. Technovation, 31 (4): 177–184.Google Scholar
Narula, R., & Hagedoorn, J. 1999. Innovating through strategic alliances: Moving towards international partnerships and contractual agreements. Technovation, 19 (5): 283–294.Google Scholar
National Innovation Foundation − India. 2013. India innovates. Ahmedabad.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. 1993. National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nepelski, D., & De Prato, G. 2014. International technology sourcing between a developing country and the rest of the world. A case study of China. Technovation, 35: 12–21.Google Scholar
Nidumolu, R., Prahalad, C. K., & Rangaswami, M. R. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Business Review, 87 (9): 56–64.Google Scholar
Niedergassel, B., Kanzler, S., Alvidrez, S., & Leker, J. 2011. Cross-cultural perceptions on knowledge sharing in heterogenous collaborations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 15 (3): 563–592.Google Scholar
Niedergassel, B., & Leker, J. 2011. Different dimensions of knowledge in cooperative R&D projects of university scientists. Technovation, 31 (4): 142–150.Google Scholar
Panagariya, A. 2007. Why India lags behind China and how it can bridge the gap. The World Economy, 30 (2): 229–248.Google Scholar
Pandey, I. M. 1998. The process of developing venture capital in India. Technovation, 18 (4): 253–261.Google Scholar
Parboteeah, K. P., Walter, S. G., & Block, J. H. 2015. When does Christian religion matter for entrepreneurial activity? The contingent effect of a country's investments into knowledge. Journal of Business Ethics, 130 (2): 447–465.Google Scholar
Parida, V., Wincent, J., & Kohtamäki, M. 2013. Offshoring and improvisational learning: Empirical insights into developing global R&D capabilities. Industry & Innovation, 20 (6): 544–562.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., & Luo, Y. 2001. Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational networking in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22: 455–477.Google Scholar
Peters, H. P. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. 1993. Co-word-based science maps of chemical engineering. Part II: Representations by combined clustering and multidimensional scaling. Research Policy, 22: 47–71.Google Scholar
Pisano, G. 2006. Profiting from innovation and the intellectual property revolution. Research Policy, 35 (8 SPEC. ISS.): 1122–1130.Google Scholar
Plechero, M., & Chaminade, C. 2013. The influence of micro-characteristics in different modes of globalization of innovation: A comparative study of Indian (Pune) and Chinese (Beijing) firms. Industry & Innovation, 20 (7): 661–682.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. 2001. Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107 (1): 33–60.Google Scholar
Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Bachrach, D., & Podsakoff, N. 2005. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 473–488.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K. 2005. The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid: Eradicating poverty through profits. Philadelphia: Wharton.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., & Mashelkar, R. A. 2010. Innovation's holy grail. Harvard Business Review, 88 (7–8): 132–141.Google Scholar
Press Trust of India. 2014. November 27. India lags far behind China, US in R&D expenditure: Vardhan. Economic Times.Google Scholar
Price, R. 2015. June 8. The founder of China's biggest startup reveals the secret to its success. Business Insider India.Google Scholar
Pries, F., & Guild, P. 2011. Commercializing inventions resulting from university research: Analyzing the impact of technology characteristics on subsequent business models. Technovation, 31 (4): 151–160.Google Scholar
Pyke, D., Farley, J., & Robb, D. 2002. Manufacturing technology and operations in China: A survey of state-owned enterprises, private firms, joint ventures and wholly-owned foreign subsidiaries. European Management Journal, 20 (4): 356–375.Google Scholar
Radjou, N., Prabhu, J., & Ahuja, S. 2012. Jugaad innovation: Think frugal, be flexible, generate breakthrough growth. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Raichaudhuri, A. 2005. Issues in entrepreneurship education. Decision, 32 (2): 73–84.Google Scholar
Ramachandran, J., Pant, A., & Pani, S. K. 2012. Building the BoP producer ecosystem: The evolving engagement of Fabindia with Indian handloom artisans. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (1): 33–51.Google Scholar
Ramani, S. V. 2002. Who is interested in biotech? R&D strategies, knowledge base and market sales of Indian biopharmaceutical firms. Research Policy, 31 (3): 381–398.Google Scholar
Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. 2009. Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (4): 463–494.Google Scholar
Ray, S., & Ray, P. K. 2011. Product innovation for the peoples car in an emerging economy. Technovation, 31 (5–6): 216–227.Google Scholar
Reyes-García, V. 2010. The relevance of traditional knowledge systems for ethnopharmacological research: Theoretical and methodological contributions. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 6 (1): 32.Google Scholar
Rokaya, M., Atlam, E., Fuketa, M., Dorji, T. C., & Aoe, J. 2008. Ranking of field association terms using co-word analysis. Information Processing & Management, 44: 738–755.Google Scholar
Ruttan, V. W. 1997. Induced innovation, evolutionary theory and path dependence: Sources of technical change. The Economic Journal, 107 (444): 1520–1529.Google Scholar
Sahasranamam, S., & Ball, C. 2016. Sustainable procurement in social enterprises: Comparative case studies from India and Scotland. In Bals, L. & Tate, W. (Eds.), Implementing triple bottom line sustainability into global supply chains: 219–231. Yorkshire: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
Sahasranamam, S., & Sud, M. 2016. Opportunity and necessity entrepreneurship: A comparative study of India and China. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 22 (1): 21–40.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. 2001. The Silicon Valley-Hsinchu connection: Technical communities and industrial upgrading. Berkeley Planning Journal, 15: 3–33.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. L. 1991. The origins and dynamics of productive networks in Silicon Valley. Research Policy, 20 (5): 423–437.Google Scholar
Schmiele, A. 2013. Intellectual property infringements due to R&D abroad? A comparative analysis between firms with international and domestic innovation activities. Research Policy, 42 (8): 1482–1495.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 2000. Entrepreneurship as innovation. In Swedberg, R. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The social science view: 51–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. 2000. The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25 (1): 217–226.Google Scholar
Sharma, P., Nookala, S. B. S., & Sharma, A. 2012. India's national and regional innovation systems: Challenges, opportunities and recommendations for policy makers. Industry & Innovation, 19 (6): 517–537.Google Scholar
Sharova, A. 2013. Chinese PhDs vs US PhDs. Inomics blog. http://blog.inomics.com/en/chinese-phds-vs-us-phds/.Google Scholar
Sikka, P. 1996. Indigenous development and acquisition of technology: An Indian perspective. Technovation, 16 (2): 85–95.Google Scholar
Sikka, P. 1998. Analysis of in-house R&D centres of innovative firms in India. Research Policy, 27 (4): 429–433.Google Scholar
Singh, D. A., & Gaur, A. S. 2013. Governance structure, innovation and internationalization: Evidence from India. Journal of International Management, 19 (3): 300–309.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. 2005. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16 (5): 522–536.Google Scholar
Soh, P. H., Mahmood, I. P., & Mitchell, W. 2004. Dynamic inducements in R&D investment: Market signals and network locations. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (6): 907–917.Google Scholar
Srivastava, M. K., & Wang, T. 2014. When does selling make you wiser? Impact of licensing on Chinese firms’ patenting propensity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (4): 602–628.Google Scholar
Stock, G. N., Greis, N. P., & Fischer, W. A. 2001. Absorptive capacity and new product development. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12 (1): 77–91.Google Scholar
Subrahmanya, M. B. 2013. External support, innovation and economic performance: What firm level factors matter for high-tech SMEs? How? International Journal of Innovation Management, 17 (5): 1350024.Google Scholar
Sun, Y., & Du, D. 2010. Determinants of industrial innovation in China: Evidence from its recent economic census. Technovation, 30 (9–10): 540–550.Google Scholar
Tatikonda, M. V., & Stock, G. N. 2003. Product technology transfer in the upstream supply chain. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20 (6): 444–467.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15 (6): 285–305.Google Scholar
Thorpe, R., Holt, R., Macpherson, A., & Pittaway, L. 2005. Using knowledge within small and medium-sized firms: A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7 (4): 257–281.Google Scholar
Thurik, R., Carree, M. A., Van Stel, A., & Audretsch, D. B. 2008. Does self-employment reduce unemployment? Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 673–686.Google Scholar
Tiwana, A. 2008. Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (3): 251–272.Google Scholar
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14 (3): 207–222.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (5): 996–1004.Google Scholar
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41 (4): 464–476.Google Scholar
Tseng, Y., Lin, C., & Lin, Y. 2008. Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing Management, 43: 1216–1247.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, V. K., Sikka, P., & Abrol, D. K. 2009. Technology dissemination programmes and extramural R&D support in India. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (6): 680–690.Google Scholar
van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. 2003. Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (3): 1–30.Google Scholar
Vanderwerf, P. A. 1992. Explaining downstream innovation by commodity suppliers with expected innovation benefit. Research Policy, 21 (4): 315–333.Google Scholar
Vecchi, A., Piana, B. Della, & Vivacqua, E. 2015. An institutional-based view of innovation – An explorative comparison of business groups in China and India. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19 (5): 1550051.Google Scholar
Venkataraman, S. 1997. The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research. In Katz, J. (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth: 119–138. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, M., Echambadi, R., Venugopal, S., & Sridharan, S. 2014. Subsistence entrepreneurship, value creation, and community exchange systems: A social capital explanation. Journal of Macromarketing, 34 (2): 213–226.Google Scholar
Viswanathan, M., & Sridharan, S. 2012. Product development for the BoP: Insights on concept and prototype development from university-based student projects in India. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29 (1): 52–69.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. 1986. Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32 (7): 791–805.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Yi, J., Kafouros, M., & Yan, Y. 2015. Under what institutional conditions do business groups enhance innovation performance? Journal of Business Research, 68 (3): 694–702.Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Wong, T. J., & Xia, L. 2008. State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: Evidence from China. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 46 (1): 112–134.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., & Li-Ying, J. 2014. When does inward technology licensing facilitate firms’ NPD performance? A contingency perspective. Technovation, 34 (1): 44–53.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Ning, L., & Chen, J. 2014. Product diversification through licensing: Empirical evidence from Chinese firms. European Management Journal, 32 (4): 577–586.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Pan, X., Ning, L., Li, J., & Chen, J. 2014. Technology exchange patterns in China: An analysis of regional data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (2): 252–272.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., & Li-Ying, J. 2012. The impact of licensed-knowledge attributes on the innovation performance of licensee firms: Evidence from the Chinese electronic industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38 (5): 699–715.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Zhou, Z., Ning, L., & Chen, J. 2015. Technology and external conditions at play: A study of learning-by-licensing practices in China. Technovation, 43: 29–39.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D., Seidel, M. D. L., & Stewart, K. J. 2001. Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (4): 717–747.Google Scholar
White, S., Gao, J., & Zhang, W. 2005. Financing new ventures in China: System antecedents and institutionalization. Research Policy, 34 (6): 894–913.Google Scholar
Whitley, R., & Gläser, J. 2008. The changing governance of the sciences: The advent of research evaluation systems (26th ed.). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Wiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Shepherd, D. A. 2009. Building an integrative model of small business growth. Small Business Economics, 32 (4): 351–374.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Witt, M. A., & Redding, G. 2013. Asian business systems: Institutional comparison, clusters and implications for varieties of capitalism and business systems theory. Socio-Economic Review, 11 (2): 265–300.Google Scholar
Wong, C., & Yap, X. 2011. Mapping technological innovations through patent analysis: A case study of foreign multinationals and indigenous firms in China. Scientometrics, 91 (3): 773–787.Google Scholar
Woolf, S. H. 2008. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Jama, 299 (2): 211–213.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2015. Research and development expenditure (% of GDP). World Development Indicators. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS.Google Scholar
Wu, W. 2010. Managing and incentivizing research commercialization in Chinese Universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35 (2): 203–224.Google Scholar
Wu, W., & Zhou, Y. 2011. The third mission stalled? Universities in China's technological progress. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37 (6): 812–827.Google Scholar
Xie, Y., Gao, S., Jiang, X., & Fey, C. F. 2015. Social ties and indigenous innovation in China's transition economy: The moderating effects of learning intent. Industry and Innovation, 22 (2): 79–101.Google Scholar
Yingqi, C. 2015. October 28. R&D fund bolstered by private sector. China Daily.Google Scholar
Yip, G., & McKern, B. 2014. Innovation in emerging markets – The case of China. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 9 (1): 2–10.Google Scholar
Yu, X., & Si, S. 2012. Innovation, internationalization and entrepreneurship: A new venture research perspective. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 14 (4): 524–539.Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Baden-Fuller, C., & Mangematin, V. 2007. Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: Evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 36 (4): 515–528.Google Scholar
Zhao, F. 2005. Exploring the synergy between entrepreneurship and innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 11 (1): 25–41.Google Scholar
Zheng, C., & Wang, B. 2012. Innovative or imitative? Technology firms in China. Prometheus, 30 (2): 169–178.Google Scholar
Zheng, S., Li, H., & Wu, X. 2013. Network resources and the innovation performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Management Decision, 51 (6): 1207–1224.Google Scholar
Zou, Y., & Zhao, W. 2014. Anatomy of Tsinghua University Science Park in China: Institutional evolution and assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39 (5): 663–674.Google Scholar