Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:25:25.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Think Local, Act Global: A Call to Recognize Competing, Cultural Scripts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2016

Usha C. V. Haley  and
George T. Haley
Usha C. V. Haley
Affiliation:
West Virginia University, USA
George T. Haley
Affiliation:
University of New Haven, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Dialogue, Debate, and Discussion
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 205 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adler, N., Doktor, R., & Redding, G. 1986. From the Atlantic to the Pacific Century: Cross-cultural management reviewed. Journal of Management, 12 (2): 295–318.Google Scholar
Doz, Y., Santos, J., & Williamson, P. 2001. From global to metanational: How companies win in the knowledge economy. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Kieser, A. 1994. Why organization theory needs historical analyses – And how this should be performed. Organization Science, 5: 608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Välikangas, L., & Gibbert, M. 2015. Strategic innovation. Old Tappan, NJ: Pearson FT Press.Google Scholar

REFERENCES

Albert, M. 2007. Globalization theory: Yesterday's fad or more lively than ever? International Political Sociology, 1 (2): 165–182.Google Scholar
Brannen, M. Y., & Doz, Y. L. 2010. From a distance and detached to up close and personal: Bridging strategic and cross-cultural perspectives in international management research and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 26 (3): 236–247.Google Scholar
Buhari-Gulmez, D. 2010. Stanford School on sociological institutionalism: A global cultural approach. International Political Sociology, 4 (3): 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boje, D. M., Haley, U. C. V., & Saylors, R. 2016. Antenarratives of organizational change: The microstoria of Burger King's storytelling in space, time and strategic context. Human Relations, 69 (2): 391–418.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. 2004. Narratives in social science research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Doremus, P. N., Keller, W. W., Pauly, L. W., & Reich, S. 1998. The myth of the global corporation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Drori, G., & Krucken, G. (Eds.). 2009. World society: The writings of John W. Meyer. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2015a. Why some business schools are deciding to ‘deglobalize’, December 21.Google Scholar
The Economist . 2015b. Panda power, December 19.Google Scholar
Fox, J. 2014. The world is still not flat. Harvard Business Review, November 3.Google Scholar
Friedman, T. L. 2006. The world is flat. London: Penguin Google Scholar
Garrett, G. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gerlach, M. L. 1992. Alliance capitalism: The social organization of Japanese business. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P. 2007. Why the world isn't flat. Foreign Policy, 159 (Mar–Apr): 54–60.Google Scholar
Ghemawat, P., & Altman, S. A. 2014. DHL Global Connectedness Index. Bonn, Germany: Deutsche Post DHL.Google Scholar
Guillén, M. F. 2001. Is globalization civilizing, destructive or feeble? A critique of five key debates in the social science literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 235–260.Google Scholar
Haley, U. C. V. 1991. Corporate contributions as managerial masques: Reframing corporate contributions as strategies to influence society. Journal of Management Studies, 28 (5): 485–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haley, U. C. V. 2001. Multinational corporations in political environments: Ethics, values and strategies. Singapore, New Jersey: World Scientific Press.Google Scholar
Haley, U. C. V. 2013. Smithfield and beyond: Examining foreign purchases of American food companies, testimony to United States Senate, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry, Washington, DC, July 10.Google Scholar
Haley, U. C. V. 2014. Impact and usefulness: The impact of management research on public policy and society, Chair, Organizer & Panel Presenter, All Academy Theme Symposium, Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, August.Google Scholar
Haley, U. C. V., & Boje, D. M. 2014. Storytelling the internationalization of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 45 (9): 1115–1132.Google Scholar
Haley, U. C. V., & Haley, G. T. 2013. Subsidies to Chinese industry: State capitalism, business strategy and trade policy, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haley, G. T., Haley, U. C. V., & Tan, C. T. 2004. The Chinese Tao of business: The logic of successful business strategy, New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Haley, G. T., Haley, U. C. V., & Tan, C. T. 2009. New Asian Emperors: The business strategies of the overseas Chinese. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S., & Kam, J. 2009. Publishing in top journals – A never-ending fad? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (2): 221–224.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. 2007. Reflections on institutional theories of organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., & Sahlin-Anderson, K. (Eds.) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., & Thomas, G. 1989. Ontology and rationalization in the Western cultural account. In Thomas, G., Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F., & Boli, J. (Eds.) Institutional structure. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Boli, J., Thomas, G., & Ramirez, F. O. 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology, 103 (1): 144–181.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Hannan, M. T. (Eds.). 1979. National development and the world system: Educational, economic, and political change, 1950–1970, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2): 340–363.Google Scholar
Pope, S., & Meyer, J. W. 2015. The global corporate organization. Management and Organization Review, 11 (2): 173–177.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. 2005. Globalization theory: A post mortem. International Politics, 42 (1): 2–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, E. H. 2009. Reflections on the history of marketing thought. Journal of Historical Research in Marketing, 1 (2): 330–345.Google Scholar
Starbuck, W. H. 2009. The constant causes of never-ending faddishness in the behavioral and social sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25 (1): 108–116.Google Scholar
Stopfod, J. M., & Strange, S. 1991. Rival states, rival firms. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Storper, M., & Salais, R. 1997. Worlds of production: The action frameworks of the economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Strang, D. 1994. The new institutionalism as a form of structural analysis. In Knottnerus, J. D. & Prendergast, C. (Eds). Recent developments in the theory of social structure. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2015. Reconnecting with the business world: Socially responsible scholarship. EFMD Global Focus, 9 (1): 36–39.Google Scholar
Välikangas, L. 2015. Introduction to ‘The global corporate organization’. Management and Organization Review, 11 (2): 173.Google Scholar
Warnock, E. 2015. Christmas cheer here requires reservations with the Colonel – Japan makes merry with shortcake and fried chicken; ‘boring without Kentucky’. Wall Street Journal, December 19, A1.Google Scholar