Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:58:31.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Transition Perspective for Business School Research and Education in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2021

Hao Tan
Hao Tan*
Affiliation:
University of Newcastle, Australia Emlyon Business School, France
*
Corresponding author: Hao Tan (hao.tan@newcastle.edu.au)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this perspective article, I draw on transition research that has been developed to account for the transitions in many socio-technical systems within human society, such as energy, water, and food. I argue that many ideas developed in transition research can be applied to the ecosystem of contemporary business schools in China for its transformation. Using the multi-level perspective (MLP) from transition research as an analytic framework, I examine the socio-technical system of business schools in China for understanding the main forces that may shape a potential transition of the sector. I also draw on transition management theory and insights from research on the politics of transitions for important conditions that are required to enable a transition in this specific context.

摘要

本文运用转型研究中的有关理念分析中国商学院系统的转型。转型研究是从研究能源、水、食物等人类社会中的各种“社会-技术体系”的转型发展起来的研究领域。本文采用转型研究中的多层次视角，分析影响中国商学院系统转型的主要因素。本文还基于转型研究中的转型管理理论和政治维度的研究，探讨在中国特定环境中商学院转型所需的条件。尽管有一些限制条件，这一转型观为分析和促进中国商学院研究与教育的转型实践提供了新的视角。

Аннотация

В этой статье, я предлагаю свою точку зрения и опираюсь на исследования переходных процессов, которые были разработаны для объяснения преобразований во многих социально-технических системах человеческого общества, таких как производство энергии, воды и пищи. Я утверждаю, что многие идеи, разработанные в исследованиях переходных процессов, могут быть применимы для преобразования в экосистеме современных бизнес-школ в Китае. Используя многоуровневую перспективу из исследований переходных процессов в качестве аналитической основы, я изучаю социально-техническую систему бизнес-школ в Китае для того, чтобы понять основные силы, которые влияют на потенциальные преобразования в этом секторе. Я также опираюсь на теорию управления преобразованиями и выводы из исследований в сфере политических преобразований при обсуждении некоторых важных условий, которые необходимы для обеспечения преобразований в данном конкретном контексте. Несмотря на ее полезность, я отмечаю ряд ограничений в теории переходных процессов для изучения сферы образования и научных исследований в бизнес-школах.

Resumen

En este artículo de perspectiva, me baso en la investigación sobre transición que ha sido desarrollada para dar cuenta de las transiciones en muchos sistemas socio-técnicos en la sociedad humana como es la energía, el agua, y la alimentación. Sostengo que muchas ideas desarrolladas en la investigación sobre la transición pueden ser aplicadas al ecosistema de escuelas de negocios contemporáneas en China para su transformación. Usando la perspectiva multi-nivel (MLP por sus iniciales en inglés) de la investigación sobre transición cómo un marco analítico, examino los sistemas socio-técnicos de las escuelas de negocio en China para entender las principales fuerzas que dan fuerza a una posible transición del sector. También me baso en la teoría gestión de la transición y los aportes de la investigación sobre la política de las transiciones para nuestra discusión sobre algunas condiciones importantes que son requeridas para facilitar una transición en este contexto específico. Pese a su utilidad, noto limitaciones en la perspectiva de transición en la educación y la investigación en escuelas de negocios.

Keywords

Chinese business schoolsreform in Chinese higher educationresearch impactresponsible researchsustainability transition中国商学院负责任的研究中国高等教育改革利基创新研究影响力китайские бизнес-школыреформа узкоспециализированных инноваций в высшем образовании Китаявлияние исследованийответственные исследованияEscuelas de negocio chinasreforma de nichos de innovación en la educación superior en Chinaimpacto de la investigacióninvestigación responsable
Type
Perspectives
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , October 2022 , pp. 1011 - 1030
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Association for Chinese Management Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

ACCEPTED BY Senior Editor Zhi-Xue Zhang

References

REFERENCES

Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Bosman, R., Loorbach, D., Rotmans, J., & van Raak, R. 2018. Carbon lock-out: Leading the fossil port of Rotterdam into transition. Sustainability, 10(7): 2558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, Y. 2016. Internationalization and theoretical innovation of Chinese management research. Chinese Journal of Management, 13(8): 1135–1149 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Friedman, R., & McAllister, D. J. 2017. Seeing and studying China: Leveraging phenomenon-based research in China for theory advancement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economy, E. C. 2018. The third revolution: Xi Jinping and the new Chinese state. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, G. 2020. Why every business professor should write practitioner-focused articles. Business Horizons, 417–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W. 2011. The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1): 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W. 2018. Low-carbon transition via system reconfiguration? A socio-technical whole system analysis of passenger mobility in Great Britain (1990–2016). Energy Research & Social Science, 46: 86–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W. 2019. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: A review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 39: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., & Wassermann, S. 2016. The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4): 895–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. 2007. Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genus, A., & Coles, A.-M. 2008. Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37: 1436–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B. 2019. Confronting the crisis of confidence in management studies: Why senior scholars need to stop setting a bad example. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 18(2): 286–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsgens, R., Lubke, S., & Hasselkub, M. 2018. Social innovations in the German energy transition: an attempt to use the heuristics of the multi-level perspective of transitions to analyze the diffusion process of social innovations. Energy, Sustainability and Society. 8: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, L., You, S., & Du, Y. 2012. Chinese context and theoretical contributions to management and organization research: A three-decade review. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 173–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewin, A. Y., Chiu, C.-Y., Fey, C. F., Levine, S. S., McDermott, G., Murmann, J. P., & Tsang, E. 2016. The critique of empirical social science: New policies at Management and Organization Review. Management and Organization Review, 12(4): 649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P. 2012. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29(4): 849–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Leung, K., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J.-D. 2012. Indigenous research on Chinese management: What and how. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Sekiguchi, T., & Zhou, K. 2016. The emerging research on indigenous management in Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 33(3): 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, P. P., Yang, Z., & Chen, C. 2018. The way of ‘integration of knowledge and action’ in academic research management: Combining the distinctive paths of Drucker and March. Foreign Economics & Management, 40(12): 28–45. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Li, X., & Ma, L. 2020. Chinese management research needs self-confidence but not over-confidence. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37: 481–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockwood, M., Kuzemko, C., Mitchell, C., & Hoggett, R. 2017. Historical institutionalism and the politics of sustainable energy transitions: A research agenda. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(2): 312–333.Google Scholar
Loorbach, D. 2010. Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1): 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loorbach, D., van der Brugge, R., & Taanman, M. 2008. Governance in the energy transition: Practice of transition management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, 9(2/3): 294–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallapaty, S. 2020. China bans cash rewards for publishing papers. Nature, 579(18).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
March, J., & Simon, H. A. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. 2012. Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6): 955–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. 2009. What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42: 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. 2011. Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1): 70–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H. 2004. Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Mori, A. 2018. Socio-technical and political economy perspectives in the Chinese energy Transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 35: 28–36.Google Scholar
Naber, R., Raven, R., Kouw, M., & Dassen, T., 2017. Scaling up sustainable energy innovations. Energy Policy, 110: 342–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, M., 2018. Shut down the business school! An insider's account of what's wrong with management education. London: Pluto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peng, H., Liu, L., & Su, Y., 2012. Isomorphism in Chinese business school: Explanation based on new institution theory. Chinese Journal of Management, 9(3): 329–337.Google Scholar
Raven, R., Kern, F., Jacobsson, S., & Verhees, B., 2016. The politics of innovation spaces for low-carbon energy: Introduction to the special issue. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18: 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. 2001. More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1): 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RRBM. 2017. A vision of responsible research in business and management: Striving for useful and credible knowledge. Community for Responsible Research in Business and Management Position Paper, Available from URL: https://rrbm.network/position-paper/Google Scholar
Sharma, G., & Bansal, P. 2020. Cocreating rigorous and relevant knowledge. Academy of Management Journal, 63(2): 386–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H, A. 1967. The business school: A problem in organisational design. Journal of Management Studies, 4(1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, H. 2017. Making impact through industry-focused research: An Asia Pacific perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34(3): 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toffel, M. W. 2016. Enhancing the practical relevance of research. Production and Operations Management, 25: 1493–1505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tourish, D. 2020. The triumph of nonsense in management studies. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 19(1): 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2013. On compassion in scholarship: Why should we care? Academy of Management Journal, 38: 167–180.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2018. Undertake responsible research. Speech given at Tongji University, China, 19 December 2018. Available from URL: https://mba.tongji.edu.cn/mba/show-32-864.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S., & Zhang, Z.-X. 2011. Management and building theory: The strategies of research on Chinese native management. Journal of Chongqing University (Social Science Edition), 17(4): 1–7.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H., Meyer, A. D., & Jing, R. 2018. Opportunities and challenges of engaged indigenous scholarship. Management and Organization Review, 14(3): 449–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wei, L. 2018. A reflection on the development of business schools in Mainland China with a focus on MBA programs. Chinese Management Scholars 50 Forum Official WeChat Account, 23 March 2019. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Wong, M. Y. H., & Kwong, Y. 2019. Academic censorship in China: The case of The China Quarterly. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2): 287–292.Google Scholar
Xia, J., Zhu, J. C., Fan, D., & Zhang, M. M. 2020. The ‘iron rice-bowl’ regime revisited: Whither human resource management in Chinese universities? Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource, 58(2): 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Luo, W., Song, J., & Huang, D. 2016. The evolution of the internationalization of Chinese management research and its future direction: The development paradigm of the International Association for Chinese Management Research (IACMR) in China and community building. Chinese Journal of Management, 13(7): 947–957.Google Scholar
Zhang, X., Zheng, X., & Xi, Y. 2020. How governmental agencies legitimize organizations: A case study on Chinese business schools from 1977 to 2014. Academy of Management Learning & Education,, 19(4): 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y. L., & Wu, G. 2019. The scientific development of management discipline in China during the past 70 years: A review and perspective. Management World: 11, 8–18. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
Zhang, Z.-X., & Zhong, W. 2016. Barriers to organizational creativity in Chinese companies. In Lewin, A. Y., Kenney, M., & Murmann, J. P. (Eds). China's innovation challenge: Overcoming the middle-income trap. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z-X., Chen, Z. X., Chen, Y.-R., & Ang, S. 2014. Business leadership in the Chinese context: Trends, findings, and implications. Management and Organization Review, 10(2): 199–221.Google Scholar