Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T17:45:25.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Unexamined Differences in Dreams: Chinese Firms’ Globalization and Interface Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2015

Gordon Redding
Gordon Redding*
Affiliation:
INSEAD and HEAD Foundation, Singapore
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most of the issues that undermine firms’ globalization efforts are attributable to a combination of cultural differences and weak managerial skill and experience. Because of its exclusive focus on influences from the political stability and institutional maturity aspects of country contexts, Child and Marinova’s (2014) framework for identifying the challenges faced by Chinese firms going abroad is incomplete. It needs to also include the cultural mindsets of executives as an explanatory factor in analyzing how the ‘qualitative interface’ in contextual combinations affects the operation of firms investing into foreign countries.

摘要

摘要

阻碍公司全球化努力的大多数问题都归结为文化差异和不足的管理技巧与经验的组合。由于Child和Marinova（2014）的研究仅集中在国家情境下的政治稳定性和制度成熟度的影响，他们的研究框架不足以辨识中国企业在海外面对的挑战。高层管理者的文化思维定式应该被囊括其中，用以分析解释在情境性组合中“质的对接”如何影响公司在海外的运作。

Keywords

Chinacultureexecutive rationaleinterfacesmindsets中国文化高层管理者的理念对接思维定式
Type
Forum Commentaries
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , November 2014 , pp. 399 - 404
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, S. A. 2010. Is China killing the WTO? The International Economy, 40–41. 67.Google Scholar
d’Avray, D. L. 2010. Rationalities in history: A Weberian essay in comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergere, M. C. 1989. The Golden Age of the Chinese bourgeoisie 1911–1937. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Child, J., & Marinova, S. 2014. The role of contextual combinations in the globalization of Chinese firms. Management and Organization Review, 10(3): 347–371.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. P. 2013. Trouble in the middle: American-Chinese business relations, culture, conflict, and ethics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, J. A. 2006. Dragon multinationals: New players in 21st century globalization. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management, 23: 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGregor, J. 2012. No ancient wisdom, no followers: The challenge of Chinese authoritarian capitalism. Westport, CN: Prospecta Press.Google Scholar
Molina, C. 2012. Understanding institutional plurality in MNEs: The roles of institutional logic and social identification. In Tihanyi, L., Devinney, T. M., Devinney, T. & Pedersen, T. (Eds.), Institutional theory in international business and management: 399–424. London: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2005. The thick description and comparison of alternative systems of capitalism. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(2): 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, G. 2008. Separating culture from institutions: The use of semantic spaces as a conceptual domain and the case of China. Management and Organization Review, 4(2): 257–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shambaugh, D. 2012. Are China’s multinational corporations really multinational? Brookings East Asia Quarterly, IV: 1. April–June. [Cited 15 October 2013.] Available from URL: http://www.brookings.edu/research/articles/2012/07/10-china-multinationals-shambaugh Google Scholar
Spigarelli, F., Mucelli, A., & Alon, A. 2013. Chinese overseas M&A: Overcoming cultural and organizational divides. International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, 6(1–2): 190–208. Interscience Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar