Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:39:13.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

77.9 On the variation in the length of daylight in a simple model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

P.K. Aravind*
Affiliation:
Physics Department Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609 USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Ling, J.F., “The variation in the length of daylight”. Math. Gaz. 73, 302 (1989).Google Scholar
2. See, for example, Hosmer, G.L. and Robbins, J.M., “Practical Astronomy”, (John Wiley, New York, 1931). The appendix summarizes all the principal formulae of spherical trigonometry.Google Scholar
3. Bachmann, C.H., “The equinox displaced”, Physics Teacher 28, 536 (1990); see also the letters by Pasachoff, J.M. and Allen, R. in Physics Teacher 29,71 (1991).Google Scholar
Wagon, S., “Why December 21 is the longest day of the year”, Mathematics Magazine 63, 307 (1990). An article on a related subject that may be of interest is “Solar zenith and local time from a rainbow” by Tan, A. and King, T., Physics Teacher 28, 224 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Oliver, B.M., “The shape of the analemma”, Sky and Telescope, July 1972, p.20.Google Scholar