Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T18:39:55.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applicability and the Teaching of Geometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Extract

The mistakes of great men leave long shadows in history Euclid’s proofs in the main are elegant and concise, and apart from style of presentation, with slight alterations form the basis for most modern geometrical texts. Exception must be taken, however, to the earlier introductory propositions. These have been found unsuitable for teaching to children. Some have sought to explain this away by saying that Euclid wrote for mature adults, but that children of 11 or 12 cannot comprehend logical proofs. From other eminent authorities, however, come criticisms of the proofs themselves. Thus Russell says that Euclid’s proposition I, 4, is a tissue of nonsense. Undoubtedly Euclid’s earlier proofs fall far short of perfection, but, perversely enough, the criticisms which have been levelled at them are even more mistaken than are Euclid’s proofs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)