Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T07:26:14.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Continuity and Irrational Number

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

G.J Whitrow
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous article I have outlined my conception of the rôle of history in the exposition of mathematical technique. In this article I attempt to provide my bare thesis with a respectable clothing of practicability The treatment of Number and Continuity which follows is a short and very sketchy historical supplement to the technical treatment of the same subjects in, say, the earlier chapters of Hardy’s Pure Mathematics.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 17 , Issue 224 , July 1933 , pp. 151 - 157
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 151 of note * “The Importance of the History of Mathematics in relation to the Study of Mathematical Technique”, Math. Gazette, XVI (October 1932), p. 225.

Page 153 of note * My diagram illustrates what this sentence means. A comes between C n and thus C n+1 on CC 1 C 2. and thus the constructed diagonal “falls short of” or “goes beyond” A.

N.B.—To the Pythagoreans the “strips” C 1 C 2, etc.. and not the partitions C 1, C 2, etc., were the “points” of the diagonal.

Page 154 of note * Eudoxus and Archimedes are, in a sense, parallel to Newton and Gauss, respectively.