Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T09:00:40.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Derangement revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Isaac Sofair*
Affiliation:
4524 Brandon Lane, Fredericksburg, VA 22408, USA

Extract

In [1], the following theorem is stated and proved as Proposition XXXII, using the Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion:

The number of ways of deranging a series of n terms so that no term may be followed by the term which originally followed it is

(Note that the conventional definition of a derangement of a series of terms is an arrangement such that no term occupies its original position. However, the usage in this paper allows some terms to remain in their original positions.) This may most easily be visualised by considering a string of n distinct characters, abc … n say. This string has a sequence of n − 1 pairs of consecutive characters, namely, ab, bc, … mn. This article derives three theorems that can be deduced from the above theorem. The first theorem determines the number of permutations of a character string that are free from a random subset comprising a given number m of the n − 1 pairs, but contain all the remaining pairs. The second theorem sums the results of the first theorem for m, m + 1, …, n − 1 pairs.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Whitworth, William Allen, Choice and chance (5th edn.), Hafner Publishing Company, (1965) pp. 103104.Google Scholar