Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:38:01.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Fingers find Fermat’s factorisation most probable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 August 2015

Randall Baumback*
Affiliation:
James Logan H.S., Union City, Ca 94587 USA Ohlone College, Fremont Ca, USA

Extract

“I know my ones. I know my twos. I know my threes… Ah, the finger man.” An unforgettable exchange between a defiant, remedial student, and a confident, driven math teacher in the movie Stand and Deliver [1]. This back-and-forth exchange presented a teachable moment for the determined teacher giving way to a class presentation of the finger manipulation for multiplying by nine, a technique familiar to most every elementary school student in the U.S. Little did I know this simple idea would lead to the heuristic thinking outlined in the sequence of topics below connecting Fermat and finger multiplication.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Keogh, T., Stand and deliver, IMDb, accessed August 2010 at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094027/amazonl Google Scholar
2. Eyler, M. and Valero, V., Multiplying by nine using your hands, YouTube. November 13, 2008, http://www.youtube.com/atch?v=CVbcra3rCqc (accessed August 13, 2010).Google Scholar
3. Baumback, R., Finger Multiplication: A Mathematical Excursion, https://sites.google.com/site/rbaumback/publications-papers-l (accessed June 25, 2012).Google Scholar
4. Wikipedia, Fermat’s factorization method, accessed June 2013 at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermat%27s_factorization_method Google Scholar
5. Flegg, G., Numbers: their history and meaning, Dover (1983).Google Scholar
6. McKee, J., Speeding Fermat’s factoring method, Mathematics of Computation, 68 (1999) pp. 17291737.Google Scholar