Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T07:47:01.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Involution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Extract

It is a sound principle in teaching that we should begin by saying what a thing is, rather than what it is not, but the reader of the Gazette is not coming across the word involution for the first time, anti the best serrice I can render him is to insist at the outset that involution is not a form of homography Before I can enlarge on this warning, I must add another. In elementary work we are in no danger of confusing the relation of collinearity, a relation between three or more points, with a class of collinear points, for which we have the familiar name of line. But the one word involution has been made to do duty both for a relation and for a class, and although when we understand the subject we can always interpret the word froin the context, the teacher will find it worth while to sacrifice brevity for a time and to tallr of the involution-relation and of an involution-class.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)