No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The most elementary proof that ?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 October 2016
Extract
Here we present a simplification of one of the standard proofs that . We then look at extensions of the new approach, and add comments on the nature of the simplification (which relates to Step 1 below) and finally on the literature.
As in most proofs of the result, we shall actually prove that ; because
this is equivalent to the result sought.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Mathematical Association 2016
References
2.
Yaglom, A. M. & Yaglom, I. M., An elementary derivation of the formulas of Wallis, Leibniz and Euler for the number π, Uspekhi Mat. Nauk.
57 (1953) pp.181–187 [also available at http://www.mathnet.ru ]Google Scholar
3.
Yaglom, A. M. & Yaglom, I. M., Challenging mathematical problems with elementary solutions, Volume 2, Dover (2003), Problem 145.Google Scholar
4.
Papadimitriou, I., A simple proof of the formula
, Amer. Math. Monthly
80 (1973) pp. 424–425.Google Scholar
5.
Apostol, T. M., Mathematical analysis (2nd edn.), Addison-Wesley (1974) p. 30, pp. 216-217.Google Scholar
6.
Chapman, R., Evaluating ζ (2), accessed June 2016 at http://empslocal.ex.ac.uk/people/staff/rjchapma/etc/zeta2.pdf
Google Scholar
7.
Bromwich, T. J. I'A., An introduction to the theory of infinite series (2nd edn.), Macmillan (1959).Google Scholar
8.
Berndt, B. C. & Yeap, B. P., Explicit evaluations and reciprocity theorems for finite trigonometric sums, Advances in Applied Math.
29 (2002) pp. 358–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.
Cauchy, A-L., Cours d'analyse de l'École Royale Polytechnique (Volume 1) (1821), pp. 556–559: available in many printings such as the Cambridge Library Collection, Cambridge University Press (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.
Apostol, T. M., Another elementary proof of Euler's formula for ζ (2n), Amer. Math. Monthly
80 (1973) pp. 425–431.Google Scholar