Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T10:34:24.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recurring Digits in Irrational Decimals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2016

Extract

Is it always possible to determine a real number to an assigned number of decimal places? Can we always tell how many terms of a convergent sequence must be taken to determine its limit to, say, four decimal places? How much information does the convergence of a sequence give us about the decimal expansion of the limit? These are the questions we shall consider; we shall find that the answer to the first two is “no”. To the third question the answer is that convergence itself gives very little information but that “most” convergent sequences have in fact a subtler property which gives precise information about the expansion of the limit, the rate at which the successive digits of the expansion can be determined and the number of times a digit can recur. The questions we have raised are of practical importance for it is with the approximations-to-so-many-places, not with real numbers themselves, that all practical mathematics is concerned.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mathematical Association 1941

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Page 273 of note * We are not interested, here, in the common distinction between fast and slowly convergent sequences, for even a fast convergent sequence may, as we shall see, yield the digits of its limit only with great reluctance.

Page 277 of note * It follows that the same inequality holds even when p, q are not relatively prime, for if p = hp′, q = hp′, where p′, q′ have no common factor, then

|xq 2p 2| = h 2 |xq2p2| ≥ 1,

and so |xp 2/q 2| ≥ 1/q 2.