Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:50:34.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mean-Variance-CVaR model for Portfolio OptimizationModeling using a Multi-Objective Approach Based on a Hybrid Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2010

A. Taik ,
R. Aboulaich ,
R. Ellaia  and
S. El Moumen
Get access

Abstract

In this paper we present a new hybrid method, called SASP method. We propose thehybridization of two methods, the simulated annealing (SA), which belong to the class ofglobal optimization based on the principles of thermodynamics, and the descent method werewe estimate the gradient using the simultaneous perturbation. This hybrid method givesbetter results. We use the Normal Boundary Intersection approach (NBI) based on the SASPmethod to solve a portfolio optimization problem. Such problem is a multi-objectiveoptimization problem, in order to solve this problem we use three statistical quantities:the expected value, the variance and the Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). The purpose ofthis work is to find the efficient boundary of the considered multi-objective problemusing the NBI method based on the SASP method

Keywords

CVaRmulti-objective optimizationNBI methodhybrid method SASPsimultaneous perturbationsimulated annealing
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Modelling of Natural Phenomena , Volume 5 , Issue 7: JANO9 – The 9thInternational Conference on Numerical Analysis and Optimization , 2010 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Rockafeller, R. T., Uryasev, S.. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk . Journal of Risk, 2 (2000), No. 3, 21–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uryasev, S.. Conditional value-at-risk: optimization algorithms and applications . Financial Engineering News, (2000), No. 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
Das, I., Dennis, J. E.. Normal boundary intersection, a new methode for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicreteria optimization problems . SIAM J. Optimization, 8 (1998), No. 3, 631–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnemoy, C.. La méthode du recuit simulé: restauration des images, reconnaissance de Surfaces . R.A.I.R.O. Automatique-Productique Informatique Industrielle, 25 (1991), No. 5, 497–517.Google Scholar
Markowitz, H. M.. Portfolio selection . Journal of Finance, 1 (1952), No. 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
Spall, J. C.. Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation . IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 37 (1992), No. 3, 332–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rockafeller, R. T., Uryasev, S.. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions . Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (2002), No. 7, 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, Q., He, Z., Leng, H.. A hybrid genetic algorithm for a class of global optimization problems with box constraints . Applied Mathematics and Computation, 197 (2008), No. 2, 924–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsoulos, I. G.. Modifications of real code genetic algorithm for global optimization . Applied Mathematics and Computation, 203 (2008), No. 2, 598–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar