Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:47:03.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Absorption and Reduction in Velocity of β-rays on their passage through matter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

E. Madgwick
E. Madgwick
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The early experiments of Lenard(1), Leithauser(2), and Becker(3) on cathode rays led to the exponential law of absorption; those of Rutherford(4), Schmidt(5) and Hahn and Meitner(6) on β-rays indicated that the rays from some radioactive bodies were absorbed exponentially and that those from others were not. It was considered by Hahn and Meitner that the exponential law of absorption was an indication of the homogeneity of the rays. It was found also that the exponential law was not disturbed by the thickness of radiating material and this led to the conclusion that the rays are not appreciably reduced in velocity on their passage through matter. The theories of McClelland(7) and Schmidt(8) attributed the absorption to the stoppage of particles in mid-career.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 23 , Issue 8 , October 1927 , pp. 970 - 981
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Lenard, , Wied. Ann. 56, p. 255 (1895).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Leithauser, , Ann. d. Phys. 18, p. 410 (1905).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Becker, , Ann. d. Phys. 17, p. 445 (1905).Google Scholar
(4)Rutherford, , Phil. Mag. 47, p. 109 (1899).Google Scholar
(5)Schmidt, , Phys. Zeit. p. 764 (1906); p. 361 and p. 737 (1907); p. 929 (1909).Google Scholar
(6)Hahn, and Meitner, , Phys. Zeit. p. 321 (1908); p. 948 (1909).Google Scholar
(7)McClelland, , Trans. Roy. Soc. Dubl. (1905, 1907).Google Scholar
(8)Schmidt, , Ann. d. Phys. 23, p. 671 (1907).Google Scholar
(9)Whiddington, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 86, p. 360 (1911–1912).; 89, p. 554 (1913–14).Google Scholar
(10)Wilson, (W.), Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 82, p. 612 (1909); 84, p. 141 (1910).Google Scholar
(11)Danysz, , Le Radium, p. 1 (1912).Google Scholar
(12)von Baeyer, , Phys. Zeit. p. 485 (1912).Google Scholar
(13)Rawlinson, , Phil. Mag. 30, p. 627 (1915).Google Scholar
(14)D'Espine, , Comptes Rendus, p. 458 (1926).Google Scholar
(15)Bohr, , Phil. Mag. 25, p. 10 (1913); 30, p. 581 (1915).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(16)Varder, , Phil. Mag. 29, p. 725 (1915).Google Scholar
(17)Schonland, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 104, p. 235 (1923); 108, p. 187 (1925).Google Scholar
(18)Terrill, , Phys. Rev. 22, p. 101 (1923).Google Scholar
(19)Chadwick, , Verh. d. D. Phys. Ges. 16, p. 383 (1914).Google Scholar
(20)Ellis, , Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 101, p. 1 (1922).Google Scholar
(21)Wilson, (C. T. R.), Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 104, p. 1 and p. 192 (1923).Google Scholar