Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T04:47:13.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of wave functions for the normal helium atom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

T. D. H. Baber
Affiliation:
St John's College, Professor of Mathematics in the University of Bristol
H. R. Hassé
Affiliation:
St John's College, Professor of Mathematics in the University of Bristol

Extract

The object of this paper is to compare some of the wave functions which have been suggested for the normal helium atom, including one calculated in the first section of the paper, as regards energy, magnetic susceptibility and electric polarizability. Since this atom provides the simplest two-electron problem, such a comparison is of special interest and may indicate the direction in which improvements might be made in the calculation of wave functions for more complicated atoms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1937

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Hassé, , Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 26 (1930), 542,CrossRefGoogle Scholar and 27 (1931), 66. These are referred to as H. (I) and H. (II) respectively.

The greater part of the calculations for this wave function were carried out by one of us (T. D. H. B.) in 1931 and 1932. The remaining calculations in this paper have been made, with the assistance of Miss M. J. White, at various times during the last four years.

* No correction has been made for the finite mass of the nucleus.

* Phys. Zeit. 33 (1932), 57.Google Scholar

* Zeit. f. Phys. 54 (1929), 354.Google Scholar

* Zeit. f. Phys. 65 (1930), 209.Google Scholar

For the latest results on the energy of ionised atoms with two electrons see Robinson, , Phys. Rev. 51 (1937), 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cf. Mayer, and Mayer, , Phys. Rev. 43 (1933), 605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar