Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:33:48.362Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conduction of heat in a slab in contact with well-stirred fluid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

J. C. Jaeger
J. C. Jaeger
Affiliation:
The University of Tasmania
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The problem of conduction of heat in a solid whose surface is in contact with fluid, which is so well stirred that its temperature is constant throughout its mass, often arises in practice, for example in calorimetry, or in the warming of a closed room. Despite their importance, problems of this type have not been much studied since the presence of the mass of fluid at the surface gives rise to a boundary condition for which the classical methods of solution do not apply without modification; the Laplace transformation method, however, has the advantage that it can be applied in the same way to all cases.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , June 1945 , pp. 43 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1945

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Peddie, , Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. 19 (1901), 34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mason, and Weaver, , Phys. Rev. 31 (1928), 1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Schiemann, , Phys. Rev. 37 (1931), 1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Peek, , Ann. Math. (2), 30 (1929), 265CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Langer, , Tohoku Math. J. 35 (1932), 260Google Scholar; Lowan, , Phil. Mag. 17 (1934), 849CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jaeger, , J. Proc. Roy. Soc. N.S.W. 74 (1940), 342, and 75 (1941), 130Google Scholar: Gaskell, , American J. Math. 64 (1942), 447. The last three authors use the Laplace transformation method, the others extensions of the classical methods.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* E.g., Dufton, , Phil. Mag. 34 (1943), 376CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Smith, , Journ. App. Phys. 12 (1941), 638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Carslaw, and Jaeger, , Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 35 (1939), 394, and in greater detail in Jaeger, loc. cit. (1941).CrossRefGoogle Scholar