Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T13:49:26.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Univalence for inverse diagrams and homotopy canonicity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2014

MICHAEL SHULMAN
MICHAEL SHULMAN*
Affiliation:
University of San Diego, San Diego, CA, U.S.A. E-mail: shulman@sandiego.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We describe a homotopical version of the relational and gluing models of type theory, and generalize it to inverse diagrams and oplax limits. Our method uses the Reedy homotopy theory on inverse diagrams, and relies on the fact that Reedy fibrant diagrams correspond to contexts of a certain shape in type theory. This has two main applications. First, by considering inverse diagrams in Voevodsky's univalent model in simplicial sets, we obtain new models of univalence in a number of (∞, 1)-toposes; this answers a question raised at the Oberwolfach workshop on homotopical type theory. Second, by gluing the syntactic category of univalent type theory along its global sections functor to groupoids, we obtain a partial answer to Voevodsky's homotopy-canonicity conjecture: in 1-truncated type theory with one univalent universe of sets, any closed term of natural number type is homotopic to a numeral.

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 25 , Special Issue 5: From type theory and homotopy theory to Univalent Foundations of Mathematics , June 2015 , pp. 1203 - 1277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

References

Arndt, P. and Kapulkin, K. (2011) Homotopy-theoretic models of type theory. In: Ong, L. (ed.) Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science volume 6690, Springer Berlin/Heidelberg 45–60.Google Scholar
Avigad, J., Kapulkin, C. and Lumsdaine, P. L. (2013) Homotopy limits in Coq. ArXiv:1304.0680.Google Scholar
Awodey, S., Garner, R., Martin-Löf, P. and Voevodsky, V. (2011) Mini-workshop: The homotopical interpretation of constructive type theory. Oberwolfach Reports 8.1, 609–638.Google Scholar
Awodey, S. and Warren, M. A. (2009) Homotopy theoretic models of identity types. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 146 (45) 45–55. ArXiv:0709.0248.Google Scholar
Barthel, T. and Riehl, E. (2013) On the construction of functorial factorizations for model categories. Algebraic and Geometric Topology 13 1089–1124. ArXiv:1204.5427.Google Scholar
Bellissima, F. (1986) Finitely generated free Heyting algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic 51 (1) 152–165.Google Scholar
Berger, C. and Moerdijk, I. (2011) On an extension of the notion of Reedy category. Mathematische Zeitschrift 269 (3) 977–1004. ArXiv:0809.3341.Google Scholar
Bergner, J. E. and Rezk, C. (2013) Reedy categories and the Θ-construction. Mathematische Zeitschrift 274 (1–2) 499–514. ArXiv:1110.1066.Google Scholar
Brown, K. S. (1974) Abstract homotopy theory and generalized sheaf cohomology. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 186 419–458.Google Scholar
Cartmell, J. (1986) Generalised algebraic theories and contextual categories. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 32 209–243.Google Scholar
Cisinski, D.-C. (2002) Théories homotopiques dans les topos. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 174 43–82.Google Scholar
Cisinski, D.-C. (2006) Les préfaisceaux comme modèles type d'homotopie. Vol. 308. Astérisque. Soc. Math. France.Google Scholar
Cisinski, D.-C. (2012) Blog comment on post The mysterious nature of right properness. Available at: http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/category/2012/05/the_mysterious_nature_of_right.html#c041306.Google Scholar
Gambino, N. and Garner, R. (2008) The identity type weak factorisation system. Theoretical Computer Science 409 (1) 94–109.Google Scholar
Gepner, D. and Kock, J. (2012) Univalence in locally Cartesian closed 1-categories. ArXiv:1208.1749.Google Scholar
Hedberg, M. (1998) A coherence theorem for Martin–Löf's type theory. Journal of Functional Programming 8 (4) 413–436.Google Scholar
Hirschhorn, P. S. (2003) Model Categories and their Localizations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs volume 99, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M. (1994) On the interpretation of type theory in locally cartesian closed categories. In: Proceedings of Computer Science Logic. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 427–441.Google Scholar
Hofmann, M. and Streicher, T. (1998) The groupoid interpretation of type theory. In: Twenty-five years of constructive type theory (Venice, 1995). Oxford Logic Guides, volume 36, New York: Oxford University Press 83–111.Google Scholar
Hofstra, P. and Warren, M. A. (2013) Combinatorial realizability models of type theory. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (10) 957–988. ArXiv:1205.5527.Google Scholar
HoTT Project (2013) The homotopy type theory coq library. Available at: http://github.com/HoTT/HoTT/.Google Scholar
Hovey, M. (1999) Model Categories, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs volume 63, American Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
Jacobs, B. (1999) Categorical Logic and Type Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics volume 141, Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. W. (2010) On modified Reedy and modified projective model structures. Theory and Applications of Categories 24 (8) 179–208.Google Scholar
Kapulkin, C., Lumsdaine, P. L. and Voevodsky, V. (2012) The simplicial model of univalent foundations. ArXiv:1211.2851.Google Scholar
Licata, D. R. and Harper, R. (2012) Canonicity for 2-dimensional type theory. In: Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. POPL '12, Philadelphia, PA, USA: ACM 337–348.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, P. L. (2010) Weak omega-categories from intensional type theory. Typed Lambda Calculi and Applications 6 1–19. ArXiv:0812.0409.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, P. L. (2011) Strong functional extensionality from weak. Available at: http://homotopytypetheory.org/2011/12/19/strong-funext-from-weak/.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, P. L. and Shulman, M. (2014) Semantics of higher inductive types. In preparation.Google Scholar
Lumsdaine, P. L. and Warren, M. (2014) The local universes model: an overlooked coherence construction for dependent type theories. ArXiv:1411.1736.Google Scholar
Lurie, J. (2009) Higher Topos Theory, Annals of Mathematics Studies volume 170, Princeton University Press. ArXiv:math.CT/0608040.Google Scholar
Makkai, M. (1995) First order logic with dependent sorts, with applications to category theory. Available at: http://www.math.mcgill.ca/makkai/folds/.Google Scholar
Moerdijk, I. (2012) Fiber bundles and univalence. Available at: http://www.pitt.edu/~krk56/fiber_bundles_univalence.pdf. (Notes prepared by Chris Kapulkin).Google Scholar
Quillen, D. G. (1967) Homotopical Algebra, Lecture Notes in Mathematics volume 43, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Radulescu-Banu, A. (2006) Cofibrations in homotopy theory. ArXiv:math/0610009.Google Scholar
Reedy, C. L. (n.d.) Homotopy theory of model categories. Available at: http://www-math.mit.edu/~psh/.Google Scholar
Shulman, M. (2014) The univalence axiom for elegant Reedy presheaves. To appear in HHA. ArXiv:1307.6248.Google Scholar
Streicher, T. (1991) Semantics of Type Theory: Correctness, Completeness, and Independence Results, Progress in Theoretical Computer Science, Birkhaäuser.Google Scholar
Strøm, A. (1972) The homotopy category is a homotopy category. Archiv der Mathematik (Basel) 23 435–441.Google Scholar
Univalent Foundations Program (2013) Homotopy type theory: Univalent foundations of mathematics. Available at: http://homotopytypetheory.org/book/.Google Scholar
van den Berg, B. and Garner, R. (2011) Types are weak ω-groupoids. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 102 (2) 370–394.Google Scholar
van den Berg, B. and Garner, R. (2012) Topological and simplicial models of identity types. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 13 (1) 3:1–3:44.Google Scholar
Voevodsky, V. (2011) Notes on type systems. Available at: http://www.math.ias.edu/~vladimir/Site3/Univalent_Foundations.html.Google Scholar
Voevodsky, V. (2013) Univalent foundations. Avaiolable at: http://github.com/vladimirias/Foundations/.Google Scholar
Wadler, P. (1989) Theorems for free! In: Functional Programming Languages and Computer Architecture, ACM Press 347–359.Google Scholar
Warren, M. A. (2008) Homotopy Theoretic Aspects of Constructive Type Theory, Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie Mellon University.Google Scholar