Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:43:08.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Locally minimal Epstein zeta functions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

K. L. Fields
Affiliation:
Rider College, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, U.S.A.
Get access

Extract

One of the problems of solid state physics is to explain why the atoms of certain elements (such as iron) arrange themselves in a body-centred cubic lattice, rather than in the much denser face-centred cubic lattice packing [8]. Recently, we discovered the geometric significance of these body-centred lattice packings: they are fragile in the sense that, assuming we have a sphere of fixed radius at each lattice point, any perturbation which does not alter the set of nearest neighbours of any sphere results in a denser configuration [3]. In other words, in-these packings it is the density of the interstitial void between the spheres that is being maximized. This fact might seem only to deepen the mystery of why such arrangements ever appear in nature at all. Our purpose here is to demonstrate that these lattice packings are in fact quite “stable”, provided one seeks a more subtle form of stability, one prompted by physical rather than purely geometrical considerations. More precisely, we will show for those lattices which possess a high degree of symmetry–and for the bodycentred cubic lattice in particular–that the EPSTEIN ZETA FUNCTION of the lattice, ∑ |r|-2s (where |r| is the distance of the r-th lattice point from the origin and s is any fixed number greater than n/2), is locally minimized, in the sense that, any lattice, obtained by a perturbation which does not alter the set of nearest neighbours of any lattice point, has an Epstein zeta function of larger value, for any s > n/2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Delone, B. N. and Ryskov, S. S.. “A contribution to the theory of the extrema of a multidimensional zeta function”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR = Soviet Math. Dokl., 8 (1967), 499503.Google Scholar
2.Fields, K. L.. “On the group of integral automorphs of a positive definite quadratic form”, J. London Math. Soc., (2), 15 (1977), 2628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Fields, K. L.. “Stable, fragile, and absolutely symmetric quadratic forms”, Mathematika, 26 (1979), 7679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fields, K. L.. “The fragile lattice packings of spheres in three dimensional space”, Acta Crystallographica, A36 (1980), 194197.Google Scholar
5.Hancock, H.. Theory of Maxima and Minima (Boston: Ginn, 1917).Google Scholar
6.Kittel, C.. Introduction to Solid State Physics (New York: Wiley, 1976), p. 96.Google Scholar
7.Lekkerkerker, C. G.. Geometry of Numbers (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1969).Google Scholar
8.Loeb, A. L.. “A systematic survey of cubic crystal structures”, J. Solid State Chem., 1 (1970), 237267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rankin, R. A.. “A minimum problem for the Epstein zeta-function”, Proc. Glasgow Math. Soc., 1 (1953), 149158.Google Scholar
10.Terras, A.. “Fourier analysis on symmetric spaces”, Encyclopedia of Mathematics (Addison-Wesley, 1980).Google Scholar