Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:14:42.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On incomparable collections of sets

Part of: Combinatorics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2010

P. D. Seymour
P. D. Seymour
Affiliation:
The Mathematical Institute, Oxford
Get access

Extract

A. J. W. Hilton [5] conjectured that if P, Q are collections of subsets of a finite set S, with |S| = n, and |P| > 2n−2, |Q| ≥ 2n−2, then for some A ∈ P, B ∈ Q we have A ⊆ B or B ⊆ A. We here show that this assertion, indeed a stronger one, can be deduced from a result of D. J. Kleitman. We then give another proof of a recent result also proved by Lovász and by Schönheim.

MSC classification

Secondary: 05A20: Combinatorial inequalities
Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematika , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 208 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © University College London 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Daykin, D. E. and Lovasz, L., “The number of values of Boolean functions” (submitted).Google Scholar
2. Edmonds, J. and Fulkerson, D. R., “Bottleneck Extrema”, J. Combinatorial Theory, 8 (1970), 299–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Kleitman, D. J., “Families of non-disjoint subsets”, J. Combinatorial Theory, 1 (1966), 153–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Schönheim, J., “Ideals of sets ”, Proc. British Combinatorial Conference Aberystwyth (1973) (forthcoming).Google Scholar
5. Brace, A. and Daykin, D. E., “Spemer type theorems for finite sets ”, Combinatorics (Proc. Combinatorial Conference, Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar