Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:28:11.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Developments in Hospital Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Francis H. Miller
Francis H. Miller*
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Law
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
Medicolegal News , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1974 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Footnotes

1. 42 U.S.C. §291 et seq

2. U.S.C. § 291c (e )

3. The legislative history of the Act suggests that the section requiring a reasonable volume of uncompensated services was offered as an alternative to a section which would have Included, inter alla & a national health Insurance program. See Rose, Marilyn; The Duty of Publicly Funded Hospitals to Provide Services to the Medically Indigent,” Feb. 1970 Clearinghouse Review, 281.

4. The former 42 C.F.R. §53.111 (b), which simply provided: “in determining what constitutes a reasonable volume of services to persons unable to pay therefor, there shall be considered conditions in the area to be served by the applicant, including the amount of services that may be avallable otherwise than through the applicant.“

5. Johnson v. Storemont Gen. Hosp., No. T-5154 (D. Kan. 1972); Corum v. Beth lsrael Hosp., No., 72 Clv 2654 (S. D. N.Y. 1972) United Appalachian Poor People v Webster Hosp. No. 71-207 (S.D. W. Va. 1971); Perry v. Greater Southeast Washington Community Hosp., No. 72871 (0. D.C. 1971); Organized Migrants in Community Action v. James Archer Smith Hosp., No. 70-1794 (S.D. Fla. 1970); Euresti v. Stenner, No. c-2462 (D. Colo. 1970); and Cook v. Ochsner Foundation Hosp., No. 70-1969 (E.D. La. 1970).

6. 37 F.R. 75 (1972)

7. 37 F.R. 142 (1972)

8. 38 F.R. 18353 (1973)

9. 42 C.F.R. 553.111