Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T23:27:08.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Meeting technological and social challenges – Sustainable design principles for damage tolerant microstructures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2012

S. Münstermann
Affiliation:
Department of Ferrous Metallurgy of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. e-mail: muenstermann@iehk.rwth-aachen.de; bleck@iehk.rwth-aachen.de
W. Bleck
Affiliation:
Department of Ferrous Metallurgy of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. e-mail: muenstermann@iehk.rwth-aachen.de; bleck@iehk.rwth-aachen.de
D. Schäfer
Affiliation:
Department of Steel Construction of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; e-mail: dirk.schaefer@stb.rwth-aachen.de; feldmann@stb.rwth-aachen.de
M. Feldmann
Affiliation:
Department of Steel Construction of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; e-mail: dirk.schaefer@stb.rwth-aachen.de; feldmann@stb.rwth-aachen.de
E. Aarden
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; e-mail: erik.aarden@ipw.rwth-aachen.de; barben@ipw.rwth-aachen.de
D. Barben
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science of RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany; e-mail: erik.aarden@ipw.rwth-aachen.de; barben@ipw.rwth-aachen.de
Get access

Abstract

For advanced high strength steels for automotive application, the time between materials development and regular use in cars, trucks and similar vehicles is rather short. In contradiction to this, hot rolled plates made of high strength low alloy steels which have been developed many years ago still do not find application fields in structural steelwork although they offer impressive mechanical properties. In this paper we argue that inadequate design rules in civil and mechanical engineering prevent such modern high strength steels from displaying their lightweight potential. A technological approach to the problem presented in this paper is to apply damage mechanics models together with probabilistic safety concepts for derivation of new improved safety factors. However, a major obstacle in this process is that these new safety factors will have to be included in the design standards. The development of such standards contains both institutional and epistemic obstacles to including alternative safety models. Taking standardization in Europe as an example, the standardization committee is characterized by both national interest representation and attempts to stimulate European integration and competitiveness. At the epistemic level, different understandings of what counts as evidence for material safety may challenge and postpone adoption of new calculative models. Institutionalization and epistemology thus contribute to a framework for standardization that needs to be questioned in order for new approaches to be accepted. Such questioning cannot be done on the basis of developing new calculation models alone, but needs a clear social component of building coalitions around the inclusion of new considerations, for example those related to sustainability.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

EN 10025, Hot rolled products of structural steels, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
EN 10208, Steel pipes for pipelines for combustible fluids - Technical delivery conditions, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
EN 10028, Flat products made of steels for pressure purposes. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
EN 1990, Eurocode : Grundlagen der Tragwerksplanung, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
A.L. Gurson, Plastic Flow and Fracture Behavior of Ductile Materials Incorporating Void Nucleation, Growth and Interaction. Ph.D. Thesis, Brown University, 1975
Gurson, A.L., J. Eng. Mater. Technol. Trans. ASME 99 (1977) 2-15
Tvergaard, V., Int. J. Fract. 17 (1981) 389-407
Tvergaard, V., Int. J. Fract. 18 (1982) 237-252
Tvergaard, V., Needleman, A., Acta Metallurgica. 32 (1984) 157-169
Needleman, A., Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 67 (1988) 69-85
Needleman, A., Tvergaard, V., Eng. Fract. Mech. 47 (1994) 75-91
Johnson, G.R., Cook, W.H., Eng. Fract. Mech. 21 (1985) 31-48
McClintock, F.A., J. Appl. Mech . 35 (1968) 363-71
Rice, J.R., Tracey, D.M., J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 17 (1969) 201-17
Atkins, A.G., J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 56 (1996) 609-18
A.G. Atkins, Fracture mechanics and metalforming : damage mechanics and the local approach of yesterday and today, In : H.P. Rossmanith, editor. Fracture Research in Retrospect, An Anniversary Volume in Honour of George R. Irwin’s 90th Birthday, Rotterdam, Brookfield : A.A. Balkema; 1997, pp. 327-52
Hancock, J.W., Brown, D.K., J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 31 (1983) 1-24
Hancock, J.W., Mackenzie, A.C., J. Mech. Phys. Sol. 24 (1976) 147-160
Bao, Y., Wierzbicki, T., Int. J. Mech. Sci. 46 (2004) 81-98
Weber, U., Mohanta, A., Schmauder, S., Int. J. Mat. Res. 98 (2007) 1071-1080
Committee of European Standards. Compass, The World of European Standards, 2001, Brussels; CEN
Bleck, W., Dahl, W., Nonn, A., Amlung, L., Feldmann, M., Schäfer, D., Eichler, B., Eng. Fract. Mech. 76 (2009) 1531-1547, ISSN : 0013-7944
Feldmann, M., Schäfer, D., Eichler, B., Stahlbau 78 (2009) 784-794, ISSN 0038-9145
W. Bleck, S. Münstermann, C. Schruff, M. Feldmann, D. Schäfer, P. Langenberg, Verbesserte Ausnutzung der Festigkeiten hochfester Druckbehälterstähle durch Erfassung des Grenzzustands der Tragfähigkeit mit Hilfe der FlieSSbruch- mechanik, Abschlussbericht des FOSTA-Forschungsvorhabens P758/12/2007, Aac- hen, 2012