Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:25:21.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A study of the theory and operation of a resonance fluorescence water vapour sensor for upper tropospheric humidity measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2002

I Keramitsoglou ,
J E Harries ,
D J Colling ,
R A Barker  and
J S Foot
I Keramitsoglou
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing and Image Processing Team, Dept. of Applied Physics, University of Athens, Panepistimioupolis, Build. PHYS-V, Athens, GR-157 84 e-mail: ikeram@cc.uoa.gr
J E Harries
Affiliation:
The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BZ, UK e-mails: d.colling@ic.ac.uk and j.harries@ic.ac.uk
D J Colling
Affiliation:
The Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College, London, SW7 2BZ, UK e-mails: d.colling@ic.ac.uk and j.harries@ic.ac.uk
R A Barker
Affiliation:
Meteorological Office, Meteorological Research Flight, Building Y46, DRA Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6TD, UK e-mails: ralbarker@meto.gov.uk and jsfoot@meto.gov.uk
J S Foot
Affiliation:
Meteorological Office, Meteorological Research Flight, Building Y46, DRA Farnborough, Hants, GU14 6TD, UK e-mails: ralbarker@meto.gov.uk and jsfoot@meto.gov.uk
Get access

Abstract

In-situ methods for measuring upper tropospheric humidity are important for two reasons: (i) they can be used as accurate spot measurements with which to calibrate more extensive data from satellites and other sensors; (ii) they can provide high accuracy measurements from aircraft or balloon with which individual processes of transport, phase change or chemistry can be studied.

In either case the accuracy of the in-situ measurement is of paramount importance. This study compares the performance and accuracy of a resonance fluorescence type of sensor (the Fluorescence Water Vapour Sensor) with a standard frost-point hygrometer.

An intercomparison of these two hygrometers has confirmed a long-standing difference between these two types of sensors (the FWVS overestimates the water vapour volume mixing ratio by 10–20%, depending on pressure). Testing the FWVS experimentally in the laboratory, along with a modelling study of the sensor has revealed that a significant source of error is due to contamination of the FWVS source emission, and the subsequent underestimation of the oxygen absorption cross-section.

Type
Research Article
Information
Meteorological Applications , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 2002 , pp. 443 - 453
Copyright
© 2002 Royal Meteorological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)