In the March issue of Microscopy Today, I perpetrated a trick on the reader. I proposed a new way to operate a transmission electron microscope, claiming that it would achieve an order of magnitude improvement in resolution—knowing that the idea would not work. A prize was offered (in a “Note Added in Proof,” separate from the main article) for the best explanation as to why it would not work. Only one entry for the competition was submitted, and that was not—as far as I can tell—a serious attempt to show why the proposal would not work.