Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:58:48.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accurate determination of the cell dimensions of magnetite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

E. Z. Basta
E. Z. Basta*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An analysed magnetite from Bisperg, Säter, Dalecarlia, Sweden, gave the formula , which corresponds closely to the ideal composition. A precise determination of the cell dimensions gave a 8·3963±0·0005 Å. at 18° C. Gentle heating of the powdered magnetite in evacuated silica glass tubes, before X-ray examination, resulted in sharply defined lines with high Bragg angles; an improvement which enabled precision data to be obtained. Four other new analyses of magnetites are also given and their lattice parameters are determined in the same way and are found to range from 8·3960 Å. to 8·3970 Å. The Bisperg magnetite being the purest sample examined, the value of its cell edge is taken as representative of pure magnetite.

The effect of the different ionic substitutions on the cell dimensions of natural magnetites is discussed. An attempt is also made to explain the great variations among the published values of cell dimensions of artificial preparations; one main reason being the presence of defect structures with varying oxygen contents in excess of the formula requirements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 31 , Issue 237 , June 1957 , pp. 431 - 442
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, (S. C.) and Calhoun, (B. A.), 1953. Acta Cryst., vol. 6, p. 105. [M.A. 12-318.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basta, (E. Z.), 1953. Mineralogical aspects of the system FeO-Fe2O3-TiO2. Ph.D. thesis, Bristol.Google Scholar
Bénard, (J.), 1939. Décomposition du protoxyde de fer. Thèse, Paris.Google Scholar
Bénard, (J.), and Chaudron, (G.), 1937. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 204, p. 766.Google Scholar
Clarke, (G. L.), Ally, (A.), and Badger, (A. E.), 1931. Amer. Journ. Sei., ser. 5, vol. 22, p. 539.Google Scholar
Frank-Kamenecky, (V. A.), 1939. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. URSS, vol. 23, p. 561.Google Scholar
Gaglioti, (V.) and D'Agostino, (O.), 1936. Gazz. Chim: Ital., vol. 66, p. 547.Google Scholar
Gheith, (M. A.), 1952. Amer. Journ. Sei., vol. 250, p. 677. [M.A. 12-175.]Google Scholar
Greig, (J. W.), Posnjak, (E.), Merwin, (H. E.), and Sosman, (R. B.), 1935. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 5, vol. 30, p. 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hägg, (G.), 1935. Zeits. physikal. Chem., ser. B, vol. 29, p. 95.Google Scholar
Holgersson, (Sven), 1927. Lunds Univ. Årsskrift, N. F., Avd. 2, vol. 23, no. 9; Kungl. Fysiogr. Sällsk. Handl., N. F., vol. 38, no. 9.Google Scholar
McAndrew, (J.), 1952. Amer. Min., vol. 37, p. 453. [M.A. 12-93.]Google Scholar
Michel, (A.), 1937. Propriétés magnétiques de quelques solutions solides. Thèse, Paris, p. 37.Google Scholar
Newhouse, (W. H.) and Glass, (J. P.), 1936. Econ. Geol., vol. 31, p. 699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouillard, (E.), 1949. Sur le comportement de l’alumine et de l’oxyde de titane vis-s-vis des oxydes de fer. Thèse, Lille.Google Scholar
Ramdohr, (P.), 1953. Econ. Geol., vol. 48, p. 667. [M.A. 12-388.]Google Scholar
Schmidt, (E. R.) and Vermaas, (F. H. S.), 1955. Amer. Min., vol. 40, p. 422.Google Scholar
Starke, (K.), 1939. Zeits. physikal. Chem., set. B, vol. 42, p. 159.Google Scholar
Tombs, (N. C.) and Rooksby, (H. P.), 1951. Acta Cryst., vol. 4, p. 474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Der Marel, (H. W.), 1951. Journ. Sedim. Petr., vol. 21, p. 12.Google Scholar
Verwey, (E. J. W.) and De Boer, (J. H.), 1936. Ree. tray. chim. Pays-Bas, vol. 55, p. 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, (E. J. W.) and De Boer, (J. H.), and Hellmann, (E. L.), 1947. Journ. Chemical Physics, vol. 15, p. 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verwey, (E. J. W.) and De Boer, (J. H.), Hayman, (P. W.), and Romeijn, (F. C.), 1947. Ibid., p. 181.Google Scholar
Vincent, (E. A.) and Phillips, (R.), 1954. Geochemica Acta, vol. 6, p. 1. [M.A. 12-293, 499.]Google Scholar