Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-20T08:58:04.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An X-ray Examination of decomposition products of chrysotile (asbestos) and serpentine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. Hargreaves  and
W. H. Taylor
A. Hargreaves
Affiliation:
Physics Department, College of Technology, Manchester
W. H. Taylor
Affiliation:
Physics Department, College of Technology, Manchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many of the experiments described in this paper were made in the course of an examination of problems arising in connexion with technical uses of fibrous asbestos, undertaken about three years ago at the request of Dr. W. Francis, at that time Director of Research for Messrs. Turner Brothers Asbestos Company Limited, Rochdale. We have recently been able to investigate in a little more detail certain points which seemed likely to be of fairly general interest, and we now present our results in the hope that they may be of use to other researchers in this field. We are indebted to Dr. Francis and his colleagues for valuable discussions on questions arising in the course of the work, and to the Directors of Messrs. Turner Brothers for financial assistance in connexion with the earlier experiments, and for permission to publish this paper.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 27 , Issue 193 , June 1946 , pp. 204 - 216
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1946

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, (H. V.) and Clark, (G. L.), 1929. Ind. Engin. Chem., vol. 21, p. 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aruja, (E.), 1943. Dissertation for Ph.D. degree (University of Cambridge).Google Scholar
Aruja, (E.), 1945. Min. Mag., vol. 27, p. 65.Google Scholar
Caillère, (S.), 1936, Bull. Soc. Franç. Min., vol. 59, p. 163. [M.A. 6–475.]Google Scholar
Cooke, (H. C.), 1937. Canada Dept. Mines and Resources, Geol. Survey, Mem. 211.Google Scholar
Francis, (W.) and Grayson, (J.), 1941. Journ. Soc. Chem. Ind., vol. 60, p. 160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruner, (J. W.), 1937. Amer. Min., vol. 22, p. 97. [M.A. 7–93.]Google Scholar
Gruner, (J. W.) 1939. Amer. Min., vol. 24, p. 186 (abstract).Google Scholar
Haraldsen, (H.), 1928. Centralblatt Min. Geol. Abt. A, p. 297.Google Scholar
Hey, (M. H.) and Bannister, (F. A.), 1941. (Private communication.)Google Scholar
Lodochnikov, (V. N.), 1936. Trans. Centr. Geol. and Prosp. Inst., Leningrad, no. 38 [M.A. 7–3.]Google Scholar
Selfridge, (G. C. Jr.), 1936. Amer. Min., vol. 21, p. 463. [M.A. 6–476.]Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.) and Bragg, (W. L.), 1930. Zeits. Krist., vol. 76, p. 201. [M.A. 4–466.]Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.), 1941. (Private communication.)Google Scholar
Warren, (B. E.), 1942. Amer. Min., vol. 27, p. 235 (abstract).Google Scholar