Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:11:01.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A second occurrence of lyndochite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

J. E. T. Horne
Affiliation:
Atomic Energy Division, Geological Survey of Great Britain
J. R. Butler
Affiliation:
Pure Geochemistry Section, Department of Geology, Imperial College of Science and Technology, University of London

Summary

Lyndochite from Tura dukas, 35 miles north of Nanyuki, Kenya, agrees closely with the type material from Canada in its chemical analysis, in the distribution of the rare earths, and in X-ray diffraction data for powder after heat treatment. The mineral is compared and contrasted with aeschynite. Uranium-poor euxenite is intimately associated with lyndochite at the type locality.

Since its discovery over thirty-five years ago, lyndochite has remained unrecorded outside its type locality of Lyndoch Township in Ontario, Canada. Its distinctive chemical composition sets it apart from almost all other Ti-rich metamiet niobates and, despite the many analyses that have been made on rare-earth niobate-tantalates, specimens that could have been regarded as similar to or approximating to lyndochite have rarely been mentioned. Its unusual characteristics include high ThO2 (about 10%) and appreciable rare-earth oxides (about 20%) with a lanthanon assemblage showing a peak concentration of Nd (and Ce), rather than any of the heavy lanthanons. The proportions of TiO2 (about 20%) and (Nb,Ta)2O5 (about 40%) are comparable to those in numerous niobate-tantalates, but are only associated with the percentages of ThO2 and Re2O3 mentioned above in some members of the aesehynite-priorite series. The lyndochite now described is chemically very close indeed to the Canadian lyndochite, and both specimens give closely similar X-ray diffraction patterns (after suitable heat treatment) which are distinct from those of any other metamict mineral.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, (J.R.), 1957. Amer. Min., vol. 42, p. 671.[M.A. 14-79].Google Scholar
Butler, (J.R.), 1958. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 763.[M.A. 13-558].Google Scholar
[CherNik, (G.P.)], 1930. (J. Soc. phys.-chem, russe), vol. 61 (for 1929), p. 735.Google Scholar
Ellswortk, (H.V.), 1927. Amer. Min., vol. 12, p. 212.[M.A. 3-366].Google Scholar
Flinter, (B.H.), Butler, (J.R.), and Harral, (G.M.), 1963. Ibid., vol. 48, p. 1210.Google Scholar
Gude, (A. J.) and Hathaway, (J.C.), 1961. Ibid., vol. 46, p. 993.[M.A. 15-496].Google Scholar
Murata, (K.J.), Dutra, (C.V.), Teixeira DA Costa, (M.), and Branco, (J. J. R.), 1958. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 16, p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, (H. J., Jr.), and Catr, (M.K.), 1953. Ibid., vol. 4, p. 292.[M.A. 12-345].Google Scholar
Rose, (H. J., Jr.) and Glass, (J.J.), 1957. Ibid., vol. ll , p. 141.Google Scholar
Rammelsberg, (C.F.), 1877. Zeits. Deut. geol. Gesell., vol. 29, p. 815.Google Scholar
Rose, (H. J., Jr.), Blade, (L.V.), and Ross (Malcolm), 1958. Amer. Min., vol. 43, p. 995.[M.A. 14-231].Google Scholar
[Semenov, (E.I.) and Barinskii, (R.L.)], 1958. (Geochemistry), 1958, p. 314.(in translation: Geochemistry, 1958, p.398.Google Scholar
[Vainshtein, (E.E.)], 1956. H Cccp (Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.), vol. 106, p. 691.Google Scholar
Turgarinov, (A.I.), and Turanskaya, (N.V.)], 1955. Cccp (Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.), vol. 104, p. 268.Google Scholar
[Zhabin, (A.G.), Alexandrov, (V.B.), and Kazakova, (M.E.)], 1961. A. T. (Transactions of the Institute of the Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Crystal Chemistry of Rare Elements), 1961, no. 7, p. 108.Google Scholar