Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:48:28.373Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An optical anomaly possibly due to optical activity in some uniaxial opaque ore minerals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. J. Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Geology, University of Strathclyde, James Weir Building, 75 Montrose Street, Glasgow G1 1XJ
B. D. Cervelle
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie, associé au C.N.R.S., Université Pierre et Marie-Curie, Tour 16, 4, place Jussieu, 75230 Paris Cedex 05
P. R. Simpson
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological Sciences, 64/78 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8NG

Summary

Spectral reflectance measurements on three uniaxial ore minerals, tellurium, chalcopyrite, and stibioluzonite, which are opaque at least in the visible part of the spectrum have revealed that the reflectance curve of the ordinary ray varies with crystallographic orientation of the polished section. The three minerals possess symmetries capable of exhibiting optical activity in transmitted light. A possible explanation, therefore, of the anomalous behaviour is that the optical constants, i.e. the refractive index and the absorption coefficient, and thus also the reflectance, of the ordinary ray may differ for sections cut normal to c where optical activity probably has its maximum effect and for sections cut parallel to c where there is probably little or no complication due to optical activity. There would therefore appear to be a need to extend the theory of reflection from absorbing media to include reflection from optically active absorbing minerals.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Araya, (R. A.), Bowles, (J. F. W.), and Simpson, (P. R.), 1977. Reflectance and composition of a single crystal of chalcopyrite from E1 Teniente ore deposit, Central Chile. Neues Jahrb. Mineral. Monatsh. H. 10, 461-7.Google Scholar
Cervelle, (B.) and Lévy, (C.), 1976. Sur les propriétés optiques de tellure dans le spectre visible. Bull. Soc. ft. Mineral. Cristallogr. 99, 220-4.Google Scholar
Galopin, (R.) and Henry, (N. F. M.), 1972. Microscopic Study of Opaque Minerals. McCrone Research Associates Ltd., London (pp. 83-102).Google Scholar
Hall, (A. J.), 1971. The mineralogy of some synthetic sulpho-salts. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Durham.Google Scholar
Jenkins (F. A:) and White, (H. E.), 1976. Fundamentals of Optics, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, Inc. (pp. 587–8).Google Scholar
Lowry, (T. M.), 1935. Optical Rotary Power. Longmans, Green & Company Ltd.Google Scholar
Nomura, (K. C.), 1960. Optical activity in tellurium. Phys. Revs. Letters, 5, 500-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuey, (R. T.), 1975. Semiconducting Ore Minerals. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company (p. 244).Google Scholar
Szivessy, (G.), 1937. Neuere Untersuchungen uber die optischen Erscheinungen bei aktiven Kristallen. Fortschr. Mineral. Kristallogr. Petrol. 21, 111-68.Google Scholar
Wooster, (W. A.), 1949. Crystal Physics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar