Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T22:59:31.549Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Jeppeite, a new K-Ba-Fe titanate from Walgidee Hills, Western Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. W. Pryce
Affiliation:
Government Chemical Laboratories, Perth, Western Australia
L. C. Hodge
Affiliation:
118 Preston Pt. Rd. E. Fremantle, Western Australia
A. J. Criddle
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, South Kensington, London SW7 5BD

Abstract

Jeppeite, a new mineral, similar in composition to and overgrown on priderite, has been found in the lamproite plug of Walgidee Hills (18° 19′ S, 124° 51′ E), Western Australia. The mineral is named for the discoverer, Dr J. Jeppe. It is monoclinic, C2/m, a 15.453 b 3.8368 c 9.123 Å β 99.25°, strongest powder lines 4.50(002) (4), 3.07(310) (10), 2.99(003,31) (10), 2.961(20) (4), 2.812(311,112) (10), 2.091 (6), 2.074 (6), 1.919 (8) similar to artificial K2Ti6O13. The sparse eluvial crystals are black, elongated along b, bounded by {100}, {20} faces (Λ 45°) and {010}; perfect 100 and good 20 cleavages or partings, submetallic lustre, pale-brown streak, brittle, and cleave into (100) flakes. Dobs 3.94, Dcalc 3.98. Colour values for illuminant C from reflectance spectra for Rp, Rb, and Rθ are: Y% 13.3, 14.4, 16.6; λd 474, 473, 475; and Pe% 5.1, 4.5, 4.3. Refractive indices from reflectances at 590 nm in air are 2.13, 2.21 and 2.35. In thin section, αΛα10° blue, β = b dark greenish brown almost to black, γ = c brown. Bireflectance and birefringence positive. H 5–6, VHN100 orientation dependent; for indentations normal to b 664–773.

Jeppeite is common in the lamproite as prismatic to acicular aggregates associated with priderite, richterite, shcherbakovite, wadeite, perovskite, and apatite in a green and white celadonite and chlorite matrix, with a little calcite and sphene, after olivine, pyroxene, and leucite.

Electron probe analysis, using Fe, Ti, nepheline, and benitoite standards, gave K2O 8.47, BaO 17.35, TiO2 69.29, Fe2O3 (total Fe) 4.74, sum 99.85%; (Mg, Na, Zr detected). This analysis calculates to (K1.15,Ba0.73)Σ1.88 (Ti5.56, Fe3+0.38)Σ5.94O13, or ideally, (K,Ba)2(Ti,Fe)6O13.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagshaw, A. N., Doran, B. H., White, A. H., and Willis, A. C. (1977) Austral. J. Chem. 30, 1195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, K. L., Aftandilian, V. D., Gilbert, W. W., Meibohm, E. P. H., and Young, H. S. (1960) J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 14, 231–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cid-Dresdner, H., and Buerger, M. J. (1962) Z. Kristal-logr. 117, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colby, J. (1968) Advances in X-ray Analysis II, 287305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandarino, J. A. (1981) Can. Mineral. 19, 423–7.Google Scholar
Norrish, K. (1951) Mineral. Mag. 29, 496–501.Google Scholar
Plumley, A. L., and Orr, W. C. (1961) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 83, 1289–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prider, R. T. (1939) Mineral. Mag. 25, 373–87.Google Scholar
Ridgway, R. (1912) Colour Standards and Colour Nomenclature. Baltimore (A. Hoen and Co.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar