Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:15:35.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acid leaching and dissolution of major sulphide ore minerals: processes and galvanic effects in complex systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

P. K. Abraitis ,
R. A. D. Pattrick ,
G. H. Kelsall  and
D. J. Vaughan
P. K. Abraitis
Affiliation:
Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, and Earth Sciences Department, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
R. A. D. Pattrick
Affiliation:
Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, and Earth Sciences Department, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
G. H. Kelsall
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK
D. J. Vaughan
Affiliation:
Williamson Research Centre for Molecular Environmental Science, and Earth Sciences Department, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The kinetics and mechanisms of dissolution of the major base metal sulphide minerals, pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite in acidic (chloride) media have been investigated. Minerals were ground in air, then dissolved in air-equilibrated solutions at pH 2.5, while monitoring the redox potential. Solution samples were analysed by ICP-AES and HPLC, and surfaces of residual sulphides analysed using XPS. Dissolution of aerial oxidation products on pyrite particles in the first 15 min apparently led to a sulphur-rich surface, and was followed by slower dissolution of pyrite itself, driven by oxygen reduction, and resulting in net production of protons. Chalcopyrite dissolution resulted in a Cu, S-rich (near) surface layer, accompanied by net consumption of protons. Apparently incongruent dissolution of galena and sphalerite may reflect the formation of elemental S at the surface. The rates of dissolution of chalcopyrite, galena and sphalerite in the presence of pyrite were determined, respectively, as 18, 31 and 1.5 times more rapid than in single-mineral experiments. These data were consistent with galvanically-promoted mineral oxidation of the other sulphides in the presence of pyrite. In the case of galena, the experimental data suggested extensive release of Pb ions and development of a sulphur-rich surface during galvanically-promoted dissolution.

Keywords

acid leachingsulphidespyritechalcopyritegalenasphalerite
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 343 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: BNFL plc, BTC (B170), Sellafield, Seascale, Cumbria, UK

References

Biegler, T., Rand, D.A.J. and Woods, R. (1970) Oxygen reduction on sulphide minerals. Part 1. Kinetics and me cha ni sm a t rot at ed pyr it e e le ct rod es. Electro analyt ical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 60, 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonnissel-Gissinger, P., Alnot, M., Erhardt, J. and Behra, P. (1998) Surface oxidation of pyrite as a function of pH. Environmental Science and Technology, 32, 2839–2845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, J.R. and Vaughan, D.J. (1994) Ore Microscopy and Ore Petrography (2nd edition). Wiley Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
Karthe, S., Szargan, R. and Suoninen, E. (1993) Oxidation of pyrite surfaces: a photoelectron spectroscopic study. Applied Surface Science, 72, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, C.N. and Vaughan, D.J. (2000) Mechanisms and rates of sulphide oxidation in relation to the problems of acid rock (mine) drainage. Pp. 197–219 in: Environmental Mineralogy: Microbial Interactions, Anthropogenic Influences, Contaminated Land and Waste Management (Cotter-Howells, J.D., Campbell, L.S., Valsami-Jones, E. and Batchelder, M., editors). Mineralogical Society Series 9, Mineralogical Society, London.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, H.W. and Muir, I.J. (1994) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic study of a pristine pyrite surface reacted with water vapour and air. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 4667–4679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.E. and Schumate, K.S. (1970) Sulfide to Sulfate Reaction Mechanism. Federal Water Quality Administration Water Polution Control Research Series Report # 14010, FPS, 02/70.Google Scholar
Subrahmanyam, T.V. and Forssberg, K.S.E. (1993) Mineral–solution interface chemistry in minerals engineering. Minerals Engineering, 6, 439–454 Vaughan, D.J., England, K.E.R., Kelsall, G.H. and Yin, Q. (1995) Electrochemical oxidation of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) and the related metal-enriched derivatives Cu4Fe5S8, Cu9Fe9S16 and Cu9Fe8S16. American Mineralogist, 80, 725–731.Google Scholar
Williamson, M.A. and Rimstidt, J.D. (1994) The kinetics and electrochemical rate-determining step of aqucous pyrite oxidation. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58, 5443–5454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, Q., Kelsall, G.H., Vaughan, D.J. and England, K.E.R. (1995) Atmospheric and electrochemical oxidation of the surface of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2). Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 59, 1091–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar