Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:29:10.204Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation of olivine crystal growth in a picrite dyke, using the fission track method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Paul Henderson ,
Madeleine Sélo  and
Dieter Storzer
Paul Henderson
Affiliation:
Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
Madeleine Sélo
Affiliation:
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Minéralogie, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France
Dieter Storzer
Affiliation:
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Laboratoire de Minéralogie, 61 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A picrite dyke with an olivine-bearing chilled margin and an olivine-rich centre has been used to test for the presence of a boundary layer around rapidly grown olivine crystals and for any variations in the olivine/melt partition coefficient for uranium as a result of probably different crystal growth rates. The technique of fission-track mapping is shown to be suitable for this kind of study despite the very low uranium concentrations in the olivines. A boundary layer appears to be present around some olivine crystals but it is not a consistent feature. Uranium partition between olivine and melt was not affected by different crystal growth rates, as revealed by different crystal morphologies.

Keywords

olivinecrystal growthpicriteuraniumfission tracks
Type
Mineral Chemistry
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 50 , Issue 355 , March 1986 , pp. 27 - 31
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bottinga, Y., Kudo, A., and Weill, D. (1966) Am. Mineral. 51, 792-806.Google Scholar
Burton, J.A., Prim, R.C. and Slichter, W.P. (1953) J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1987-91.Google Scholar
Carruthers, J.R. (1975) In Treatise on Solid State Chemistry, 5, Changes of State(N. B. Hannay, ed.) Plenum Press, 325–406.Google Scholar
Donaldson, C.H. (1975) Lithos. 8, 163-74.Google Scholar
Drever, H.I., and Johnston, R. (1967) In Ultramafic and Related Rocks (P. J. Wyllie, ed.) John Wiley and Sons, 71–82.Google Scholar
Evans, S.H.J.., and Nash, W.P. (1979) EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Unio. 60, 402.Google Scholar
Henderson, P., and Williams, C.T. (1979) In Origin and Distribution of the Elements, 2nd Symposium (L. H. Ahrens, ed.) Pergamon Press, 191-8.Google Scholar
Nolan, J., Cunningham, G.C. and Lowry, R.K. (1985) Contrib. Mineral Petrol. 89, 263-72.Google Scholar
Kouchi, A., Hosoya, S., Kitamura, M., Takei, H., and Sunagawa, I. (1983) Phys. Chem. Minerals. 9, 167-72.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, D.J. (1983) Geochim. Cosmochim. Ada. 36, 617-22.Google Scholar
Seitz, M.G. (1974) Carneg. Inst. Washington Yearb. 73, 551-3.Google Scholar
Shimizu, N. (1978) Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 39, 398-406..Google Scholar
Shimizu, N. (1981) Nature. 289, 575-7.Google Scholar
Storzer, D., and Sélo, M. (1974) C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris,279 (sér. D) 1649-51.Google Scholar