Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:16:51.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cation order in the crystal structure of ‘minasgeraisite-(Y)’

Dedicated to our friend the late Luis Menezes, who brought this mineral to our attention and graciously provided a superior specimen with crystals suitable for single-crystal structure work

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2018

Mark A. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
Frank C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

The crystal structure of ‘minasgeraisite-(Y)’, triclinic P1, a = 9.994(4), b = 7.705(3), c = 4.764(2) Å, α = 90.042(9), β = 90.218(14), γ = 90.034(9) (°), V = 366.8(5) Å3 and Z = 1, has been refined to an R1 index of 2.86% for 4170 observed (|Fo| > 4σF) reflections. Significant observed (|Fo| > 40–60 σF) reflections violate the presence of a 21-screw axis and an a-glide plane, negating the space group P21/a previously found for minerals of the gadolinite–datolite group. Averaging of the X-ray data in Laue groups 2/m and $\bar 1$ gives the following agreement indices: 2/m (9.68%) and $\bar 1$ (5.68%). The internal agreement index from averaging of identical reflections collected at multiple positions along the diffraction vector is significantly lower than that for the Laue group $\bar 1$: Rpsi = 2.40%, where 13,109 reflections were collected, 4288 are unique for P1 symmetry, and Rpsi is based on a mean data redundancy factor of > 3. Both the data merging and an |E2–1| value of 0.773 indicate that P1 is the correct space group. The general formula for the gadolinite–datolite group is W2XZ2T2O8V2 (Z = 2) which we have expanded to 20 anions (Z = 1) to show the W-site cation ordering present in ‘minasgeraisite-(Y)’. Bismuth, Ca and REE are ordered over four W sites, with Bi dominant at W1, Ca dominant at W2, and Y dominant at W3 and W4. The dominant constituent at the X sites is a vacancy, and Ca does not occur at the X sites. Significant B and Si are assigned to the Be-dominant Z sites, and the T sites are occupied by Si. The simplified ‘minasgeraisite-(Y)’ formula (Z = 1) is BiCa(Y,Ln)2(□,Mn)2(Be,B,Si)4Si4O16 [(OH),O]4. ‘Minasgeraisite-(Y)’ should be assigned to a triclinic subgroup of the gadolinite–datolite group, and its lower symmetry suggests that Ca-substituted gadolinites and hingganites should be examined for evidence of triclinic symmetry associated with cation order at the W sites.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Giancarlo Della Ventura

References

Bačik, P., Fridrichová, J., Uher, P., Pršek, J. and Ondrejka, M. (2014) The crystal chemistry of gadolinite-datolite group silicates. Canadian Mineralogist, 52, 625642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demartin, F., Pilati, T., Diella, V., Gentile, P. and Gramaccioli, C.M. (1993) A crystal–chemical investigation of alpine gadolinite. Canadian Mineralogist, 30, 127136.Google Scholar
Demartin, F., Minaglia, A. and Gramaccioli, C.M. (2001) Characterization of gadolinite-group minerals using crystallographic data only: the case of hingganite-(Y) from Cuasso al Monte, Italy. Canadian Mineralogist, 39, 11051114.Google Scholar
Foit, F.F., Phillips, M.W. and Gibbs, G.V. (1973) A refinement of the crystal structure of datolite, CaBSiO4(OH). American Mineralogist, 58, 909914.Google Scholar
Foord, E.E., Gaines, R.V., Crock, J.G., Simmons, W.B. Jr. and Barbosa, C.P. (1986) Minasgeraisite, a new member of the gadolinite group from Minas Gerais, Brazil. American Mineralogist, 71, 603607.Google Scholar
Ito, T. and Mori, H. (1953) The crystal structure of datolite. Acta Crystallographica, 6, 2432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyawaki, R., Nakai, I. and Nagashima, K. (1984) A refinement of the crystal structure of gadolinite. American Mineralogist, 69, 948953.Google Scholar
Miyawaki, R., Matsubara, S., Yokoyama, K. and Okamoto, A. (2007) Hingganite-(Ce) and hingganite-(Y) from Tahara, Hirukawa-mura, Gifu Prefecture, Japan: The description on a new mineral species of the Ce-analogue of hingganite-(Y) with a refinement of the crystal structure of hingganite-(Y). Journal of Mineralogical and Petrological Sciences, 102, 17.Google Scholar
Nickel, E.H. and Grice, J.D. (1998) The IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names: procedures and guidelines on mineral nomenclature. Mineralogy and Petrology, 64, 237263.Google Scholar
Rinaldi, R., Gatta, G.D. and Angel, R.J. (2010) Crystal chemistry and low-temperature behavior of datolite: A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. American Mineralogist, 95, 14131421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, R.D. (1976) Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallographica, A32, 751767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112122.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cooper and Hawthorne supplementary material

Supplementary material 1

Download Cooper and Hawthorne supplementary material(File)
File 150 KB
Supplementary material: File

Cooper and Hawthorne supplementary material

Supplementary material 2

Download Cooper and Hawthorne supplementary material(File)
File 219.4 KB