Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T07:24:30.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compositional variation in the pyroxenes and amphiboles of the Kangerdlugssuaq intrusion, East Greenland: further evidence for the crustal contamination of syenite magma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

C. K. Brooks
Affiliation:
Institut for Petrologi, University of Copenhagen, Østervoldgade 10, DK-1350, Copenhagen
R. C. O. Gill
Affiliation:
Institut for Petrologi, University of Copenhagen, Østervoldgade 10, DK-1350, Copenhagen

Abstract

Pyroxenes and amphiboles from the under-saturated to over-saturated syenites of the Kangerdlugssuaq intrusion have been examined to see what light they throw on the two contrasting petrogenetic models for the intrusion. Pyroxene crystals are strongly zoned outwards from augitic to more acmitic compositions, with the most calcic cores present in the foyaite, contrary to the expected pattern if the foyaite is the most evolved rock type as previously postulated. Amphiboles, which are absent in the foyaites, show an exceptionally wide compositional field varying from actinolite through richterite and katophorite to arfvedsonite. Many are manganoan and potassian varieties. However, there is no consistent variation throughout the intrusion as previous work has suggested. These results are not favourable to the idea of a crystal fractionation model for the intrusion and we suggest that the foyaite is closest to the original magma which has hybridized with the enclosing gneisses and basalts to produce the over-saturated rocks. Such a model is consistent with the existing isotopic data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Present address: Department of Geology, Chelsea College, University of London, 552 Kings Road, London SW10 0UA.

References

Bowen, N. L. (1928) The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks. Princeton, New Jersey (Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
Brooks, C. K., Engell, J., Larsen, L. M., and Pedersen, A. K. (1981) Meddr Gronland Geosci. 7. Google Scholar
Deer, W. A., Howie, R. A., and Zussman, J. (1963) Rock Forming Minerals. Vol. 2. London (Longmans), New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
Kempe, D. R. C., and Deer, W. A. (1970) Meddr Gronland, 190 (3), 95 pp.Google Scholar
Kempe, D. R. C., and Deer, W. A. (1976) Lithos, 9, 111-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kempe, D. R. C., Wager, L. R., and Deer, W. A. (1970) Meddr Gronland, 190 (2), 49 pp.Google Scholar
Larsen, L. M. (1976) J. Petrol. 17, 258-90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leake, B. E. (1978) Mineral. Mag. 42, 533-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBirney, A. R. (1979) In The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks, Yoder, H. S. (ed.). Princeton, New Jersey (Princeton University Press), 307-38.Google Scholar
Nielsen, T. F. D. (1979) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 69, 235-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pankhurst, R. J., Beckinsale, R. D., and Brooks, C. K. (1976) Ibid. 54, 17-42.Google Scholar
Parsons, I. (1979) J. Petrol. 20, 653-94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, M. (1978) Lithos, 11, 991-20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sørensen, H. (1974) The Alkaline Rocks. London, New York (Wiley).Google Scholar
Stephenson, D. (1972) Lithos, 5, 187-201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stout, J. H. (1972) J. Petrol. 13, 99-145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, T. R., and Long, J. V. P. (1969) Ibid. 10, 332-79.Google Scholar
Tilley, C. E. (1957) Q. J. geol. Soc. Lond. 113, 323-60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wager, L. R. (1965) Mineral. Mag. 34, 487-97.Google Scholar