Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:56:31.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Davidlloydite, ideally Zn3(AsO4)2(H2O)4, a new arsenate mineral from the Tsumeb mine, Otjikoto (Oshikoto) region, Namibia: description and crystal structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

F.C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
M. A. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
Y. A. Abdu
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
N. A. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
M. E. Back
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada
K. T. Tait
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N2, Canada

Abstract

Davidlloydite, ideally Zn3(AsO4)2(H2O)4, is a new supergene mineral from the Tsumeb mine, Otjikoto (Oshikoto) region, Namibia. It occurs as elongated prisms (∼10:1 length-to-width ratio) that are flattened on {010}, and up to 100 × 20 × 10 μm in size. The crystals occur as aggregates (up to 500 μm across) of subparallel to slightly diverging prisms lying partly on and partly embedded in fine-grained calcioandyrobertsite. Crystals are prismatic along [001] and flattened on {010}, and show the forms {010} dominant and {100} subsidiary. Davidlloydite is colourless with a white streak and a vitreous lustre; it does not fluoresce under ultraviolet light. The cleavage is distinct on {010}, and no parting or twinning was observed. The Mohs hardness is 3 – 4. Davidlloydite is brittle with an irregular to hackly fracture. The calculated density is 3.661 g cm–3. Optical properties were measured with a Bloss spindle stage for the wavelength 590 nm using a gel filter. The indices of refraction are α = 1.671, β = 1.687, γ = 1.695, all ±0.002; the calculated birefringence is 0.024; 2Vobs = 65.4(6)°, 2Vcalc = 70°; the dispersion is r < v, weak; pleochroism was not observed. Davidlloydite is triclinic, space group P1, with a = 5.9756(4), b = 7.6002(5), c = 5.4471(4) Å, α = 84.2892(9), β = 90.4920(9), γ = 87.9958(9)°, V = 245.99(5) Å3, Z = 1 and a:b:c = 0.7861:1:0.7167. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern [listed as d (Å), I, (hkl)] are as follows: 4.620, 100, (011, 10); 7.526, 71, (010); 2.974, 49, (200, 01); 3.253, 40, (021, 120); 2.701, 39, (10, 002, 1); 5.409, 37, (001); 2.810, 37, (210). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave As2O5 43.03, ZnO 37.95, CuO 5.65, H2O(calc) 13.27, sum 99.90 wt.%. The H2O content and the valence state of As were determined by crystal structure analysis. On the basis of 12 anions with H2O = 4 a.p.f.u., the empirical formula is (Zn2.53Cu0.39)Σ2.92As2.03O8(H2O)4.

The crystal structure of davidlloydite was solved by direct methods and refined to an R1 index of 1.51% based on 1422 unique observed reflections collected on a three-circle rotating-anode (MoKα radiation) diffractometer equipped with multilayer optics and an APEX-II detector. In the structure of davidlloydite, sheets of corner-sharing (As5+O4) and (ZnO4) tetrahedra are linked by ZnO2(H2O)4 octahedra. The structure is related to that of parahopeite.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahams, S.C. and Bernstein, J.L. (1966) Crystal structure of para magnetic ludlamite, Fe3(PO4)2·4(H2O), at 298ºK. Journal of Chemical Physics, 44, 22232229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelmehs, K.L., Bloss, F.D., Downs, R.T. and Birch, J.B. (1992) Excalibr II. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 199, 186196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244247.Google Scholar
Chao, G.Y. (1969) Refinement of the crystal structure of parahopeite. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 130, 261266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, R.V., Skinner, H.C.W., Foord, E.E., Mason, B. and Rosenwieg, A. (1997) Dana’s New Mineralogy, Eighth Edition. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1976a) Refinement of the crystal structure of adamite. The Canadian Mineralogist, 14, 143148.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1976b) The hydrogen positions in scorodite. Acta Crystallographica, B32, 28912892.Google Scholar
Hill, R.J. (1977) The crystal structure of phosphophyllite. American Mineralogist, 62, 812817.Google Scholar
Hill, R.J. and Jones, J.B. (1976) The crystal structure of hopeite. American Mineralogist, 61, 987995.Google Scholar
Kumbasar, I. and Finney, J.J. (1968) The crystal structure of parahopeite. Mineralogical Magazine, 36, 621624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhold, F., Kolitsch, U., Bernhardt, H.-J. and Lengauer, C.L. (2011) Arsenhopeite, IMA 2010-69. CNMNC Newsletter No. 8, April 2011, page 291; Mineralogical Magazine, 75, 289294.Google Scholar
Pinch, W.W. and Wilson, W.E. (1977) Tsumeb Minerals, V.: a descriptive list. Mineralogical Record, 8(3), 1737.Google Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1985) ‘PAP’ j(rZ) procedure for improved quantitative microanalysis. Pp. 104106. in: Microbeam Analysis (Armstrong, J.T., editor). San Francisco Press, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
Sarp, H. and Cerný , R. (2000) Rollandite, Cu3(AsO4)2·4H2O, a new mineral: its description and crystal structure. European Journal of Mineralogy, 12, 10451050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strunz, H. and Nickel, E.H. (2001) Strunz Mineralogical Tables, Ninth Edition. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, Germany.Google Scholar
Weber, D. and Wilson, W.E. (1977) Tsumeb IV. Geology. Mineralogical Record, 8(3), 1416.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Hawthorne et al. supplementary material

cif file

Download Hawthorne et al. supplementary material(File)
File 54.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hawthorne et al. supplementary material

Structure factors

Download Hawthorne et al. supplementary material(File)
File 71.7 KB