Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:15:55.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The heteropolymolybdate family: structural relations, nomenclature scheme and new species

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. R. Kampf*
Affiliation:
Mineral Sciences Department, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90007, USA
S. J. Mills
Affiliation:
Geosciences, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
M. S. Rumsey
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
M. Dini
Affiliation:
Pasaje San Agustin 4045, La Serena, Chile
W. D. Birch
Affiliation:
Geosciences, Museum Victoria, GPO Box 666, Melbourne, Victoria 3001, Australia
J. Spratt
Affiliation:
Earth Sciences Department, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK
J. J. Pluth
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
I. M. Steele
Affiliation:
Department of the Geophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, 5734 S. Ellis Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA
R. A. Jenkins
Affiliation:
4521 N. Via Madre, Tucson, Arizona 85749, USA
W. W. Pinch
Affiliation:
19 Stonebridge Lane, Pittsford, New York 14534, USA
*

Abstract

Type specimens of the molybdoarsenates betpakdalite, natrobetpakdalite and obradovicite and the molybdophosphates mendozavilite, paramendozavilite and melkovite, and similar material from other sources, have been examined in an effort to elucidate the relations among these phases, which we designate as the heteropolymolybdate family of minerals. Using electron microprobe analysis, X-ray powder diffraction and single-crystal X-ray diffraction with crystal structure determination where possible, it was found that natrobetpakdalite, mendozavilite and melkovite are isostructural with betpakdalite and that obradovicite has a closely related structure.

The betpakdalite and obradovicite structure types are based on frameworks containing four-member clusters of edge-sharing MoO6 octahedra that link by sharing corners with other clusters, with Fe3+O6 octahedra and with PO4 or AsO4 tetrahedra (T). The structures differ in the linkages through the Fe3+O6 octahedra, which produce different but closely related framework configurations. The structures contain two types of non-framework cation sites, which are designated A and B. In general, there are two or more A sites partially occupied by disordered, generally larger cations that are coordinated to O atoms in the framework and to H2O molecules. The B site is occupied by a smaller cation that is octahedrally coordinated to H2O molecules. The general formula for minerals with either the betpakdalite or the obradovicite structure is: [A2(H2O)nB(H2O)6][Mo8T2Fe3+3O30+7(OH)7–x], where x is the total charge of the cations in the A and B sites (+3 to +7) and n is variable, ideally 17 for arsenates and 15 for phosphates. The ideal total number of A cations is defined as 2 in the general formula, but varies from 1 to 3.8 in analysed samples. Dominant cations at the A site include K, Na and Ca and at the B site Na, Ca, Mg, Cu and Fe. The combinations that have been identified in this study define six new heteropolymolybdate species.

A suffix-based nomenclature scheme is established for minerals of the betpakdalite, mendozavilite and obradovicite groups, with the following root names based on the structure types and the T-site cations: betpakdalite (T = As), mendozavilite (T = P) and obradovicite (T = As). Two suffixes of the form -AB, corresponding to the dominant cations in the two different types of non-framework cation sites complete the species name. The historical name melkovite is retained rather than introducing mendozavilite-CaCa.

Our investigation of the paramendozavilite type specimen revealed no paramendozavilite, but an apparently closely related new mineral; however, another sample of paramendozavilite analysed had K > Na.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bandy, M.C. (1938) Mineralogy of three sulfate deposits of northern Chile. American Mineralogist, 23, 669760.Google Scholar
Birch, W.D., Pring, A. and Wallwork, K. (2002) Mendozavilite from the Fitzgerald River District, Western Australia. Australian Journal of Mineralogy, 8, 1115.Google Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E.A.J. (2008) Tidying up mineral names: an IMACNMNC scheme for suffixes, hyphens and diacritical marks. Mineralogical Record, 39, 131135.Google Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1996) Static and dynamic Jahn-Teller effects in Cu2+-oxysalt minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 34, 10891105.Google Scholar
Cook, R.B. (1978) Famous mineral localities: Chuquicamata, Chile. Mineralogical Record, 9, 321333.Google Scholar
Cooper, M.A. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1999) The crystal structure of betpakdalite and a new chemical formula Mg(H2O)6Ca2(H2O)1 3[Mo6 + 8 As5+ 2 Fe3 + 3 O3 6 (OH)](H2O)4. The Canadian Mineralogist, 37, 6166.Google Scholar
Ermilova, L.P. and Senderova, V.M. (1961) Betpakdalite - a new mineral from the oxidation zone of the Karaoba wolframite deposit. Zapiski Vsesoyuzhogo Mineralogicheckogo Obshchestra, 90, 425430.[in Russian].Google Scholar
Finney, J.J., Williams, S.A. and Hamilton, R.D. (1986) Obradovicite, a new complex arsenate-molybdate from Chuquicamata, Chile. Mineralogical Magazine, 50, 283284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gebhard, G. (1999) Tsumeb II. A Unique Mineral Locality. GG Publishing, Grossenseifen, Germany.Google Scholar
Gouzerh, P. and Che, M. (2006) From Scheele and Berzelius to Mü ller - polyoxometalates (POMs) revisited and the ‘‘missing link’’ between the bottom up and top down approaches. L’Actualité Chimique, 298, 922.Google Scholar
Hatert, F., Mills, S.J., Pasero, M. and Williams, P.A. (in press) CNMNC guidelines for the use of suffixes and prefixes in mineral nomenclature, and for the preservation of historical names. European Journal of Mineralogy. Holland, T.J.B. and Redfern, S.A.T. (1997) Unit cell refinement from powder diffraction data: the use of regression diagnostics. Mineralogical Magazine, 61, 6577.Google Scholar
Mandarino, J.A. (1981) The Gladstone-Dale relationship: Part IV. The compatibility concept and its application. The Canadian Mineralogist, 19, 441450.Google Scholar
Mills, S.J., Hatert, F., Nickel, E.H. and Ferraris, G. (2009) The standardisation of mineral group hierarchies: application to recent nomenclature proposals. European Journal of Mineralogy, 21, 10731080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.B. (1992) Betpakdalite unmasked, and a comment on bond valences. Australian Journal of Chemistry, 45, 13351354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ossandón, C., Fréraut, R., Gustafson, L.B., Lindsay, D.D. and Zentilli, M. (2001) Geology of the Chuquicamata mine: a progress report. Economic Geology, 96, 249270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, M.T. (1983) Inorganic Chemistry Concepts 8: Heteropoly and Isopoly oxometalates. Springer- Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.Google Scholar
Schmetzer, K., Nuber, B. and Tremmel, G. (1984) Betpakdalit aus Tsumeb, Namibia: Mineralogie, Kristallchemie und Struktur. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Monatshefte, 1984, 393403.Google Scholar
Shrake, T.C., Thursten, P., Ernst, D.R. and Ashleman, J.C. (1996) Geology of Chile’s Lomas Bayas porphyry copper deposit. Mining Engineering, 48, 3742.Google Scholar
Skvortsova, K.V., Sidorenko, G.A., Nesterova, Y.S., Arapova, G.A., Dara, A.D. and Rybakova, L.I. (1971) Sodium betpakdalite and conditions of its f o rma t i o n. Zapiski Vs esoyuzho go Mineralogicheckogo Obshchestra, 100, 603611.[in Russian].Google Scholar
Williams, S.A. (1986) Mendozavilite and paramendozavilite, two new minerals from Cumobabi, Sonora. Boletín de Mineralogía, 2, 1319.Google Scholar
Yegorov, B.L., Dara, A.D. and Senderova, V.M. (1969) Melkovite, a new phosphomolybdate from the oxidized zone. Zapi ski Vs esoyuzhogo Mineralogicheckogo Obshchestra, 98, 207212.[in Russian].Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Betpakdalite-CaMg.CIF

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 53.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Betpakdalite-CaMg structure factors

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 141.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Betpakdalite-NaNa.CIF

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 48.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Mendozavilite-NaCu.CIF

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 59.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Obradovicite-NaCu.CIF

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 47.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Obradovicite-NaNa.CIF

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 63 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Obradovicite-NaNa-structure-factors.doc

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 112.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Kampf et al. supplementary material

Powder XRD tables

Download Kampf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.3 MB