Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:34:56.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Micron- to nano-scale intergrowths among members of the cuprobismutite series and paděraite: HRTEM and microanalytical evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

C. L. Ciobanu ,
A. Pring  and
N. J. Cook
C. L. Ciobanu*
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Norway, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
A. Pring
Affiliation:
South Australian Museum, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia School of Chemistry, Physics and Earth Sciences, The Flinders University of South Australia, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide, South Australia 5001, Australia
N. J. Cook
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Norway, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
*
*E-mail: cristiana.ciobanu@ngu.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coherent intergrowths, at the lattice scale, between cuprobismutite (N = 2) and structurally related paděraite along both major axes (15 Å and 17 Å repeats) of the two minerals are reported within skarn from Ocna de Fier, Romania. The structural subunit, DTD, 3 layers of paděraite, is involved at interfaces of the two minerals along the 15 Å repeat, as well as in transposition of 1 paděraite unit to 2 cuprobismutite units along the 17 Å repeat in slip defects. Lattice images obtained by HRTEM across intervals of 200–400 nm show short- to long-range stacking sequences of cuprobismutite and padeÏ raite ribbons. Such nanoscale slabs mimic mm-scale intergrowths observed in back-scattered electron images at three orders of magnitude greater. These slabs are compositionally equivalent to intermediaries in the cuprobismutite-paděraite range encountered during microanalysis. Hodrushite (N = 1.5) is identified in the mm-scale intergrowths, but its absence in the lattice images indicates that, in this case, formation of polysomes between structurally related phases is favoured instead of stacking disorder among cuprobismutite homologues. The tendency for short-range ordering and semi-periodic occurrence of polysomes suggests they are the result of an oscillatory chemical signal with periodicity varying from one to three repeats of 15 Å, rather than simple ‘accidents’ or irregular structural defects. Lead distribution along the polysomes is modelled as an output signal modulated by the periodicity of stacking sequences, with Pb carried within the D units of paděraite. This type of modulator acts as a patterning operator activated by chemical waves with amplitudes that encompass the chemical difference between the minerals. Conversion of the paděraite structural subunit DTD to the C unit of cuprobismutite, conserving interval width, emphasizes that polysomatic modularity also assists interference of chemical signals with opposite amplitudes. Observed coarsening of lattice-scale intergrowths up to the mm-scale implies coupling between diffusion-controlled structural modulation, and rhythmic precipitation at the skarn front during crystallization.

Keywords

cuprobismutitepaděraiteHRTEMstacking disorderpolysomatismOcna de Fier, Romania
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 68 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 279 - 300
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ciobanu, C.L. and Cook, N.J. (2000) Intergrowths of bismuth sulphosalts from the Ocna de Fier Fe-skarn deposit, Banat, Southwest Romania. European Journal of Mineralogy, 12, 899–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciobanu, C.L. and Cook, N.J. (2004) Skarn textures and a case study: the Ocna de Fier-Dognecea orefield, Banat, Romania. Ore Geology Reviews, 24, 315–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciobanu, C.L., Cook, N.J., Topa, D., Bogdanov, K. and Merkle, R.K.W. (2002 a) Compositional variance in the cuprobismutite series and related (Pb-bearing) paderaite: insights from new occurrences. IMA 18th General meeting, Edinburgh, Programme with Abstracts, p. 264.Google Scholar
Ciobanu, C.L., Cook, N.J. and Stein, H. (2002b) Regional setting and geochronology of the Late Cretaceous Banatitic Magmatic and Metallogenic Belt. Mineralium Deposita, 37, 541–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, N.J. and Ciobanu, C.L. (2003) Lamellar minerals of the cuprobismutite series and related paděraite: a new occurrence and implications. The Canadian Mineralogist, 41, 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karup-Møller, S. and Makovický, E. (1979) On pavonite, cupropavonite, benjaminite and oversubstituted gustavite. Bulletin de Minéralogie, 102, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kissling, A. (1967) Studii mineralogice şi petrografice in zona de exoskarn de la Ocna de Fier (Banat). Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, 127 pp. (in Romanian).Google Scholar
Koděra, M., Kupčik, V. and Makovický, E. (1970) Hodrushite– a new sulphosalt. Mineralogical Magazine, 37, 641–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kupčik, V. and Makovický, E. (1968) Der Kristallstruktur des Minerals (Pb,Ag,Bi)Cu4Bi5S11. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 236–237.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1981) The building principles and classification of bismuth-lead sulphosalts and related compounds. Fortschritte der Mineralogie, 59, 137–190.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1989) Modular classification of sulphosalts– current status. Definition and application of homologous series. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 160, 269–297.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1997 a) Modularity– different types and approaches. Pp. 315–343 in: Modular Aspects of Minerals Merlino, S., editor). EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 1, Eötvös University Press, Budapest.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. (1997 b) Modular crystal chemistry of sulphosalts and other complex sulphides. Pp. 237–271 in: Modular Aspects of Minerals Merlino, S., editor). EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 1, Eötvös University Press, Budapest.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. and Karup-Møller, S. (1977) Chemistry and crystallography of the lillianite homologous series, Part 1. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 130, 264–287.Google Scholar
Makovicky, E. and Makovicky, M. (1978) Representation of compositions in the bismuthinite-aikinit e series. The Canadian Mineralogist, 16, 405–409.Google Scholar
Mariolacos, K. (2002) Single crystal synthesis of the phases Bi2+xPb3–xCuxS6+x and Cu3–xBi5–xPb2xS9 in the temperature gradient. Solid solutions in the system Bi2S3-PbS-Cu2S. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariolacos, K., Kupčik, V., Ohmasa, M. and Miehe, G. (1975) The crystal structure of Cu4Bi5S10 and its relation to the structures of hodrushite and cuprobismutite. Acta Crystallographica, B31, 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merlino, S., editor (1997) Modular Aspects of Minerals. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 1, European Mineralogical Union, 448 pp.Google Scholar
Mozgova, N.N. (1985) Non-stoichiometry and Homologous Series in Sulphosal ts. Nauka, Moscow, 264 pp. (in Russian).Google Scholar
Mumme, W.G. (1986) The crystal structure of paděraite, a mineral of the cuprobismutite series. The Canadian Mineraogist, 24, 513–521.Google Scholar
Mumme, W.G. and Ž ák, K. (1985) Paděraite, Cu5.9Ag1.3Pb1.6Bi11.2S22, a new member of the cuprobismutite-hodrushite group. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 557–567.Google Scholar
Ortoleva, P.J. (1994) Geochemical Self-Organization. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics 23. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 411 pp.Google Scholar
Ozawa, T. and Nowacki, W. (1975) The crystal structure of, and the bismuth-copper distribution in synthetic cuprobismuthinite. Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, 142, 161–176.Google Scholar
Pring, A. (1989) Structural disorder in aikinite and krupkaite. American Mineralogist, 74, 250–255.Google Scholar
Pring, A. (1995) Annealing of synthetic hammarite, Cu2Pb2Bi4S9, and the nature of cation-ordering processes in the bismuthinite-aikinite series. American Mineralogist, 80, 1166–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pring, A. (2001) The crystal chemistry of the sartorite group miner als from Lengenb ach, Binnta l, Switzerland– a HRTEM study. Schweizische Mineralogische Petrographische Mitteilungen, 81, 69–87.Google Scholar
Pring, A. and Etschmann, B. (2002) HRTEM observations of structural and chemical modulations in cosalite and its relationship to the lillianite homologues. Mineralogical Magazine, 66, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pring, A. and Hyde, B. G. (1987) Structural disorder in lindströmite: a bismuthinite-aikinite derivative. The Canadian Mineralogist, 25, 393–399.Google Scholar
Pring, A., Jercher, M. and Makovicky, E. (1999) Disorder and compositional variation in the lillianite homologous series. Mineralogical Magazine, 63, 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prodan, A., Bakker, M., Versteegh, M. and Hyde, B.G. (1982) A microscopic study of synthetic PbS-rich homologues nPbS-mBi2S3. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 8, 188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skowron, A. and Tilley, R.J.D. (1986) The transformation of chemically twinned phases in the PbS-Bi2S3 system to the galena structure. Chemica Scripta, 26, 353–358.Google Scholar
Skowron, A. and Tilley, R.J.D. (1990) Chemically twinned phases in the Ag2S-PbS-Bi2S3 system. Part I. Electron microscope study. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 85, 235–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Springer, G. (1971) The synthetic solid-solution series Bi2S3-BiCuPbS3 (bismuthin ite-aikinite). Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 19–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, C.M., Radtke, A.S. and Christ, C.L. (1973) New data on cuprobismutite. Journal of Research, United States Geological Survey, 1, 99–103.Google Scholar
Tilley, R.J.D. and Wright, A.C. (1982) Chemical twinning in the PbS region of the PbS-Bi2S3 system. Chemica Scripta, 19, 18–22.Google Scholar
Topa, D. (2001) Mineralogy, Crystal Structure and Crystal Chemistry of the Bismuthinite-Aikinite Series from Felbertal, Austria. Unpublished Doctoral thesis, University of Salzburg, Austria, 249 pp.Google Scholar
Veblen, D.R. and Buseck, P.R. (1979) Chain-width order and disorder in biopyriboles. American Mineralogist, 64, 687–700.Google Scholar
Veblen, D.R., Buseck, P.R. and Burnham, C.W. (1977) Asbestiform chain silicates: New minerals and structural groups. Science, 198, 359–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Cotta, B. (1864) Erzlagerstä tten im Banat und in Serbien. Braunmuller, W., Wien, Austria, 105 pp.Google Scholar
White, T.J. and Hyde, B.G. (1982 a) Electron microscope study of the humite minerals; I. Mg-rich specimens. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 8, 55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T.J. and Hyde, B.G. (1982 b) Electron microscope study of the humite minerals; II. Mn-rich specimens. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 8, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žák, L., Megarskaya, L. and Mumme, W.G. (1992) Rézbányite from Ocna de Fier (Vaskö): a mixture of bismuthinite derivat ives and cosalite. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Monatshefte, 69–79.Google Scholar
Žák, L., Frýda, J., Mumme, W.G. and Paar, W.H. (1994) Makovickyite, Ag1.5Bi5.5S9 from Báiţa Bihorului, Romania: The 4P natural mineral member of the pavonite series. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 168, 147–169.Google Scholar