Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:52:31.618Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mineralogical and petrological studies of Jurassic and Cretaceous sediments from southern England and their relevance to radioactive waste disposal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

A. E. Milodowski
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Nicker Hill, Keyworth, Nottinghamshire NG12 5GG
R. D. Wilmot
Affiliation:
British Geological Survey, Gray's Inn Road, London WCIX 8NG

Abstract

A sequence of sedimentary rocks from the Lower Chalk to the Oxford Clay has been studied as part of a reasearch programme into the feasibility of the disposal of low- and intermediate-level radioactive wastes in argillaceous strata. The preservation of aragonite in such rocks suggests that little groundwater movement has occurred through the bulk of these clays and this would imply that most groundwater movement is likely to occur along any fractures that may be present. Such fractures may interconnect with adjacent aquifer units along which most transport of radionuclides would occur. In these sediments the presence of smectitic clay minerals would strongly influence their retention of radionuclides by sorption and ion-exchange reactions. Compaction, calcite cementation, calcite dissolution and the diagenesis of biogenic silica have influenced the porosity and permeability of the rocks. These processes have also controlled the chemistry of many pore surfaces in contact with groundwater and these in turn will affect groundwater chemistry, and the nature of interactions with transported radionuclides.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, A. F., and Poole, A. B. (1980) Q. J. eng. Geol. London, 13, 249-54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, R. C. (1975) Carbonate sediments and their diagenesis. Developments in Sedimentology, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 658 pp.Google Scholar
Brookfield, M. (1973) Palaeogeoor. PaIaeoctimatot. Palaeoecot. 14, 137-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. J. V., Parker, A., Rees, J. F., and Ross, C. A. M. (1983) Waste Management and Research, 1, 31-52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, W. J. (1980) Q. J. eng. Geol. London, 13, 231-47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillot, J. E. (1980) Ibid. 289-303.Google Scholar
Hudson, J. D. (1978) Neues. Jahrb. Geol. Palaeontol. Abh. 157.Google Scholar
Jeans, C. V. (1968) Clay Minerals, 7, 311-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeans, C. V. (1978) Ibid. 13, 101-25.Google Scholar
Krinsley, D. H., Pye, K., and Kearsley, A. T. (1983) Geol. Mag. 120, 109-18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, I. G., and West, J. M. (1982) Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. ENPU 82-6, 63 pp.Google Scholar
Milodowski, A. E., Martin, B. A., and Wilmot, R. D. (1982) Ibid. ENPU 82-14, 83 pp.Google Scholar
Milodowski, A. E. and Wilmot, R. D. (1983) Ibid. FLPU 83-9.Google Scholar
Morgan-Jones, M. (1977) Clay Minerals, 12, 331-44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robins, N. S., Martin, B. A., and Brightman, M. A. (1981) Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. ENPU 81-9.Google Scholar
Ross, C. A. M. (1980) Q. J. eng. Geol. London, 13, 177-87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, M. R. (1973) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeocol. 14, 293317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, M. R. (1974) Sedimentology, 21, 433-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, J. M., McKinley, I. G., and Christofi, N. (1982) Rep. Inst. Geol. Sci. ENPU 82-8.Google Scholar
Wilmot, R. D., and Morgan, D. J. (1982) Ibid. ENPU 82-13.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. C. L. (1966) J. Sed. Petrol. 36, 1036-49.Google Scholar
Wilson, R. C. L. (1968a) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 4, 5-28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. C. L. (1968b) Ibid. 4, 89-123.Google Scholar
Wright, J. K. (1981) Proc. Geol. Ass. 92, 1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar