Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:52:35.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A note on low-grade contact metamorphism—southwestern Brewster County, Texas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Marvin J. Droddy  and
John C. Butler
Marvin J. Droddy
Affiliation:
Bendix Field Engineering Corporation, Geology Division, Austin Texas
John C. Butler
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Houston, Houston Texas 77004
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Intrusion of the Bee Mountain soda microsyenite plug in southwestern Brewster County, Texas established conditions of low grade contact metamorphism in the upper Cretaceous Boquillas and Pen Formation sedimentary rocks. It is unlikely that load pressure exceeded 330 bars or that temperatures exceeded 470 °C at the intrusive contact. Thermally unaltered parent materials predominantly contain ortho- and allochemical low-magnesium calcite, silt-sized quartz, calcium montmorillonite, kaolinite, and volcanic glass. Incipient metamorphism is marked by the appearance of xanthophyllite followed by prehnite formed at the expense of xanthophyllite and montmorillonite. Near the soda microsyenite contact prehnite has decomposed to yield grossular and epidote group minerals, and apophyllite has replaced calcite where fluorine-bearing solutions have reacted with the parent material. Textural modifications include the recrystallization of calcite, redistribution of some of the mineral phases, and decreased friability in the marly layers.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 328 , December 1979 , pp. 479 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, (J. C.), 1972. Annual Meeting of the Texas Academy of Sciences, San Marcos, Texas, 26 (abstr.).Google Scholar
Coombs, (D. S.), Horodyski, (R. J.), and Naylor, (R. S.), 1970. Am. J. Sci. 268, 142-56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombs, (D. S.) and Whetten, (J. T.), 1967. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 78, 269-82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droddy, (M. J.), 1974. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Liou, (J. G.), 1971a. Am. Mineral. 56, 507-31.Google Scholar
Liou, (J. G.) 1971b. Lithos. 4, 389-402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lonsdale, (J. T.), 1940. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 51, 1539-1626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, (R. A.), Lonsdale, (J. T.), Hazzard, (R. T.), and Wilson, (J. A.), 1967. Texas Bureau of Economic Geology pb. 6711, 320 pp.Google Scholar
Patel, (A. K.), 1973. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.Google Scholar
Redfield, (R.), 1940. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Texas, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
Robinson, (D.), 1973. Am. Mineral. 58, 132-3.Google Scholar
Strens, (R. G. J.), 1968. Mineral. Mag. 36, 846-67.Google Scholar
Turner, (F. J.), 1968. Metamorphic Petrology: McGraw Hill, 403 pp.Google Scholar
Winkler, (H. G. F.), 1976. Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks: Springer-Verlag, 334 PP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, (T. L.) and Stewart, (D. B.), 1968. Am. Mineral. 53, 33-88.Google Scholar
Yates, (R. G.) and Thompson, (G. A.), 1959. U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 321.Google Scholar