Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:52:51.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Schlüterite-(Y), ideally (Y,REE)2Al(Si2O7)(OH)2F, a new mineral species from the Stetind pegmatite, Tysfjord, Nordland, Norway: description and crystal structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

M. A. Cooper ,
T. A. Husdal ,
N. A. Ball ,
Y. A. Abdu  and
F. C. Hawthorne
M. A. Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
T. A. Husdal
Affiliation:
Veslefrikk 4, 8028 Bodø, Norway
N. A. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
Y. A. Abdu
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
F. C. Hawthorne*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N2, Canada
*
* E-mail: frank_hawthorne@umanitoba.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Schlüterite-(Y), ideally (Y,REE)2Al(Si2O7)(OH)2F, is a new silicate mineral species from the Stetind pegmatite, Tysfjord, Nordland, Norway. It forms dense, fibrous, radiating aggregates (up to ∼2 mm) diverging to individual needle-like crystals (up to ∼1 mm long) in cavities. Crystals are acicular to bladed, flattened on {001} and elongated along [010], and the dominant form is {001}. Schlüterite-(Y) is transparent, pale pink with a white streak and a vitreous lustre, and does not fluoresce under short-wave ultraviolet light. Mohs hardness is 5½–6, and schlüterite-(Y) is brittle with an irregular fracture, and has no cleavage. The calculated density is 4.644 g/cm3. The indices of refraction are α = 1.755, β = 1.760, γ = 1.770, all ± 0.005, 2Vobs = 71.8 (5)°, 2Vcalc = 71°, non-pleochroic, optic orientation is X ˆ a = 83.1° (β obtuse), Y//b, Z ˆ c = 50.3° (β acute). Schlüterite-(Y) is monoclinic, space group P21/c, a 7.0722(2), b 5.6198(1), c 21.4390(4) Å, β 122.7756(3)°, V 716.43(5) Å3, Z = 4. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern are as follows: [d (Å), I, (hkl)]: 4.769, 100, (012); 2.972, 55, (14); 3.289, 51, (112); 2.728, 49, (16); 2.810, 37, (020); 3.013, 37, ((16); 4.507, 36, (004). Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave SiO2 22.64, Al2O3 9.45, Y2O3 15.35, La2O3 3.25, Ce2O3 9.69, Pr2O3 2.05, Nd2O3 9.50, Sm2O3 3.57, Gd2O3 4.65, Dy2O3 4.21, Er2O3 2.31, Yb2O3 1.86, F 2.71, H2Ocalc 3.78, O = F −1.14, sum 93.88 wt%. The H2O content was determined by crystal-structure analysis. On the basis of 10 anions with (OH) + F = 3 a.p.f.u. (atoms per formula unit), the empirical formula is (Y0.73Ce0.32Nd0.30Gd0.14Dy0.12La0.11Sm0.11Pr0.07Er0.06Yb0.05)Σ=2.01Al0.99Si2.01O7(OH)2.24F0.76. The crystal structure of schlüterite-(Y) was solved by direct methods and refined to an R1 index of 1.8% based on 1422 unique observed reflections. In the structure of schlüterite-(Y), Al(OH)4O2 octahedra share (OH)–(OH) edges to form [MΦ4] chains that are decorated by (Si2O7) groups that bridge O vertices of neighbouring octahedra in a staggered fashion on either side of the chain. These [Al(OH)2(Si2O7)] chains extend parallel to b, and are linked into a continuous framework via bonds to interstitial [8](Y,REE) (= <2.400 Å>) and [9](Y,REE) (= <2.548 Å>) atoms.

Keywords

Schlüterite-(Y)new mineral speciessilicateStetind pegmatiteTysfjordNordlandNorwaycrystal structureelectron microprobe analysisoptical properties
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 77 , Issue 3 , April 2013 , pp. 353 - 366
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andresen, A. and Tull, J.F. (1986) Age and tectonic setting of the Tysfjord gneiss granite, Efjord, North Norway. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 66, 69–80.Google Scholar
Bartelmehs, K.L., Bloss, F.D., Downs, R.T. and Birch, J.B. (1992) Excalibr II. Zeitschriftfr Kristallographie, 199, 186–196.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, P., Bindi, L. and Parodi, G. (2003) Gatelite- (Ce), a new REE-bearing mineral from Trimouns, French Pyrenees: crystal structure and polysomatic relationships with epidote and törnebohmite-(Ce). American Mineralogist, 88, 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, I.D. and Altermatt, D. (1985) Bond-valence parameters obtained from a systematic analysis of the inorganic crystal structure database. Acta Crystallographica, B41, 244–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993a) Hydrogen bonding in colemanite: an X-ray and structure energy study. The Canadian Mineralogist, 31, 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, P.C. and Hawthorne, F.C. (1993b) Hydrogen bonding in meyerhofferite: an X-ray and structure energy study. The Canadian Mineralogist, 31, 305–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollase, W.A. (1971) Refinement of the crystal structures of epidote, allanite and hancockite. American Mineralogist, 56, 447–464.Google Scholar
Gaines, R.V., Skinner, H.C.W., Foord, E.E., Mason, B. and Rosenwieg, A. (1997) Dana’s New Mineralogy, eighth edition. Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1983) Quantitative characterization of s i te-occupancies in mineral s. American Mineralogist, 68, 287–306.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1985) Towards a structural classification of minerals: The VIMIVT2jn minerals. American Mineralogist, 70, 455–473.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1986) Structural hierarchy in VIMx IIITyjz minerals. The Canadian Mineralogist, 24, 625–642.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C. (1990) Structural hierarchy in [6]M[4] Tjn minerals. Zeitschriftfür Kristallographie, 192, 1–52.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, F.C., Ungaretti, L. and Oberti, R. (1995) Site populations in minerals: terminology and presentation of results of crystal-structure refinement. The Canadian Mineralogist, 33, 907–911.Google Scholar
Holtstam, D., Kolitsch, U. and Andersson, U.B. (2005) Västmanlandite-(Ce) – a new lanthanide- and F-bearing sorosilicate mineral from Västmanland, Sweden: description, crystal structure and relation to gatelite-(Ce). European Journal of Mineralogy, 17, 129–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husdal, T.A. (2008) The minerals of the pegmatites within the Tysfjord granite, northern Norway. Norsk Bergverksmuseum Skrift, 38, 5–28.Google Scholar
Libowitzky, E. (1999) Correlation of O-H stretching frequencies and O-H···O hydrogen bond lengths in minerals. Monatshefte für Chemie, 130, 1047–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcherek, T., Mihailova, B., Schlüter, J. and Husdal, T.A. (2012) Atelisite-(Y), a new rare earth defect silicate of the KDP structure type. European Journal of Mineralogy, 24, 1053–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouchou, J.L. and Pichoir, F. (1985) ‘PAP’ j(rZ) procedure for improved quantitative microanalysis. Pp. 104–106. in: Microbeam Analysis (J.T. Armstrong, editor). San Francisco Press, San Francisco, California, USA.Google Scholar
Schlüter, J., Malcherek, T. and Husdal. T.A. (2009) The new mineral stetindite, CeSiO4, a cerium endmember of the zircon group. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Abhandlungen, 186, 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldrick, G.M. (2008) A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallographica, A64, 112–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, J. and Moore, P.B. (1982) Törnebohmite, RE2Al(OH)[SiO4]2: crystal structure and genealogy of RE(III)Si(IV) $ Ca(II)P(V) isomorphisms. American Mineralogist, 67, 1021–1028.Google Scholar
Skogby, H. and Rossman, G.R. (1991) The intensity of amphibole OH bands in the infrared absorption spectrum. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals, 18, 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strunz, H. and Nickel, E.H. (2001) Strunz Mineralogical Tables, ninth edition. Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar