Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:58:48.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structural considerations of some natural and artificial alkali iron hydrated sulphates1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

F. Scordari
F. Scordari*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Mineralogia e Petrografia, Università di Bari, Italy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Two compounds are described which are structurally related to the three salts, metavoltine, α-Maus' salt, and an unnamed compound here termed ‘salt X’: The last three salts have structures based on two sheets of composition [K Fe33+O(SO4)6(H2O)3]4− which are essentially intercon-nected via Na atoms in metavoltine, K-atoms in α-Maus' salt and Na, K, H3O in salt X.

Cell parameters and space groups of the new compounds have been determined: as in metavoltine, α-Maus' salt, and salt X they have a = b ≃ 9.6 Å, but the c parameters are ≃ 36 Å and ≃ 52 Å, i.e. about double and triple that of the other three salts (≃ 18 Å).

The salt with c ≃ 36 Å was obtained using Van Tassel' recipe at about the same conditions which gave rise to salt X, i.e. from a solution containing Na2SO4·10H2O, K2SO4, Fe2(SO4)3·nH2O (n ≃ 7H2O) in the ratio 3.40:0.60:4.30. The salt with c ≃ 52 Å was formed spontaneously through a topotactic reaction of salt X.

It is possible to deduce for these two new salts:

  • (1) The presence of clusters of composition [Fe33+O(SO4)6(H2O)3]5− interconnected via K atoms to build sheets like those found in meta-voltine, α-Maus' salt, and salt X.

  • Some sheet sequences which may include the correct sequence.

  • The position of Fe3+ atoms belonging to clusters, which are connected by K atoms to form sheets.

The similar a and b lattice parameters, as well as the presence of the threefold axis in all the compounds mentioned, suggest strongly that in the two new compounds there are sheets of composition [K Fe33+O(SO4)6(H2O)3]4− which are characterized by a = b ≃ 9.6 Å and threefold symmetry. As for the c parameters, examination of possible stacking sequences of the sheets shows which sequences are consistent with the known c parameters and symmetry. The two salts have a parameter and symmetry more similar to metavoltine and salt X than to α-Maus' salt; moreover, metavoltine and salt X, like the new salts, are more stable than α-Maus' salt. That is why probably in the two new salts there are two sheets interconnected by Na atoms as in metavoltine and salt X to form a sandwich sheet of composition [Na2K2Fe63+O2(SO4)12(H2O)6]6−. Then, taking into account the c parameters and space groups, possible sequences of these sandwich sheets are considered in order to establish the likely sequence in the new salts.

Metavoltine and salt X contain clusters [Fe33+O(SO4)6(H2O)3]5− which are differently oriented: the Fe3+ cation lies at x = 0.17, y = 0.22 or x = 0.22, y = 0.17. These two Fe3+ positions involve an angle rotation for the cluster of about 25°. Owing to the similarity in a, b parameters of metavoltine and the salt with c ≃ 52 Å on one hand, and of salt X and the salt with c ≃ 36 Å on the other, it seems quite probable that the xy coordinates of the Fe3+ cations belonging to the first pair of salts are similar, and similarly for the second pair.

(Na, K) α-Maus' salt effloresces in air, the products being ferrinatrite and goldichite. The transformation (Na, K) α-Maus' salt → ferrinatrite was clarified when the structure of ferrinatrite was solved. The transition (Na, K) α-Maus' salt →, goldichite is considered in order to understand how [Fe33+O(SO4)6(H2O)3]5− clusters may be modified to build new structural units such as the corrugated sheets present in goldichite.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 43 , Issue 329 , March 1980 , pp. 669 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fang, (J. H.) and Robinson, (P. D.), 1970. Am. Mineral. 55, 1534- 1540.Google Scholar
Giacovazzo, (C.), Menohetti, (S.) and Scordari, (F.), 1970. Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei, 49, 129-140.Google Scholar
Giacovazzo, (C.) Scordari, (F.), and Menchetti, (S.), 1975. Acta Crstal-logr. B 31, 2171-2173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacovazzo, (C.) Scordari, (F.) Todisco, (A.), and Menchetti, (S.), 1976. Tsehermaks Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 23, 155-166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graeber, (E.J.) smd Roseneweig, (A.), 1971. Am. Mineral. 56, 1917- 1933.Google Scholar
Mereiter, (K.) und Vollënkle, (H.), 1978. Acta Crystallogr. B34, 378-384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, (P.B.) and Araki, (T.), 1974. Neuses Jahrb. Mineral. Abh. 121, 208-228.Google Scholar
Robinson, (P. D.) and Fang, (J. H.), 1971. Am. Mineral. 56, 1567- 1572.Google Scholar
Scordari, (F.), 1977a. Mineral. Mag. 41, 371-374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scordari, (F.), 1977b. Mineral. Mag. 41, 375-383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scordari, (F.), Vurro, (F.), and Menchetti, (S.), 1975. Tschermaks Mineral. Petrogy. Mitt. 22, 88-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Tassel, (R.), 1961. Bull Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. 37, 1-11.Google Scholar