Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:55:52.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Astride the Straits of Johore: The British Presence and Commonwealth Rivalry in South-east Asia.*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Michael Leifer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In September 1963, with the formation of Malaysia, British military establishments situated on either side of the Johore Straits were brought within the compass of a single polity. Within less than two years the Malaysian union was put asunder and those military establishments were divided by national frontiers. Such a situation was viewed with displeasure by the British Government which had supported the establishment of Malaysia in part to avoid such a prospect. To add to the problem of dealing with two governments, there was the complicating factor of the unhappy relationship between them and with it the danger of Britain being caught up in the interplay of differences to the extent of prejudicing the value of her military presence.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , May 1967 , pp. 283 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 For some biting comments on the practice of maternal relationship by the C.R.O. and its insistence on giving well-meaning advice see Kirkman, W. P., Unscrambling An Empire, London, 1966, pp. 187–8.Google Scholar

2 Article IV of the Separation Agreement had made provision for the enactment of an act by the Parliament of Malaysia whereby sovereignty and jurisdiction of the Government of Malaysia in respect of Singapore would be relinquished and that on such relinquishment that the Government of Singapore would be vested with the said sovereignty and jurisdiction ‘in accordance with the Agreement and the constitution instruments annexed’. These instruments included the act to amend the constitution of Malaysia and the Malaysia act to which the representatives from Singapore were to be a passive party. In terms of constitutional legality it would seem that this act had to precede formal separation and is therefore binding on Singapore. Article 13 of this act stated inter alia ‘… as regards the Agreement on External Affairs and Mutual Assistance between the Government of the United Kingdom and the Government of the Federation of Malaysia of 12 October 1957 and its annexes which were applied to all territories of Malaysia by Article VI of the Agreement Relating to Malaysia of 9 July 1963 … the Government of Singapore will after Singapore Day afford to the Government of the United Kingdom the right to continue to maintain the bases and other facilities occupied by their service authorities within Singapore and will permit the Government of the United Kingdom to make such use of these bases and facilities as that Government may consider necessary for the purpose of assisting in the defence of Singapore and Malaysia and for Commonwealth defence and for the preservation of peace in South East Asia’. See State of SingaporeGoogle ScholarGovernment Gazette Extraordinary, 9 08 1965, Vol. II. No. 66, pp. 2198–9.Google Scholar

3 Cmnd. 2901, p. 8.Google Scholar

4 22 February 1966.Google Scholar

5 Parliamentary Debates, Singapore, 23 02 1966, Vol. 25, No. 1, col. 30.Google Scholar

6 Utusan Melayu 30 June 1966, commented ‘It was a coincidence [sic] that after the meeting in London between Mr Lee Kuan-yew and Mr Harold Wilson, the British Government decided to give no further aid to Malaysia, although at first British leaders had promised it’.Google Scholar

7 Reported in The Alliance, Kuala Lumpur, 29 06 1966.Google Scholar

8 In a speech to the Parliamentary Labour Party which was released to the press, see The Times, 16 June 1966.Google Scholar

9 See Bell, Coral ‘Asian Crises and Australian Security’, The World Today, February 1967.Google Scholar