Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:07:49.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cholera, Public Health, and the Politics of Water in Republican Guangzhou*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 November 2012

SHUK-WAH POON
SHUK-WAH POON*
Affiliation:
Lingnan University, Hong Kong Email: swpoon@LN.edu.hk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Along with the establishment of the Department of Public Health in 1912, the implementation of public health policies became an integral part of city management in Republican Guangzhou. Yet the cholera outbreak of 1932 fully exposed the weaknesses of the medical and sanitary infrastructure of the city. Due to the Guangzhou government's inaction, the Fangbian Hospital, a local charitable hall founded in response to the bubonic plague of the 1890s, involuntarily took over the major responsibility for providing medical services for cholera patients in the early stage of the epidemic. Only after the death of hundreds of patients and Guangzhou being described as a ‘world of horror’ in the local press did the government-run hospital start to take a more active role. Epidemics have always served as catalysts for change in public health perceptions and practices. This paper attempts to explain how the cholera epidemic of 1932 changed the role of public health in the urban administration of the city. Emphasis is placed on analysing how the people of Guangzhou began to fight for a supply of clean drinking water once they came to realize the link between water and the spread of the fatal cholera epidemic in 1932. Clean water, which used to be seen as a commodity enjoyed by the privileged few, was now increasingly regarded as a citizen's right.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Asian Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 2 , March 2013 , pp. 436 - 466
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Professor Angela Leung Ki Chi and the two anonymous readers of Modern Asian Studies for their insightful comments. I am also grateful to the Hong Kong Research Grant Council for its generous financial support for this research (CUHK 4572/06H).

References

1 Quoted from Francois Delaporte, Disease and Civilization: The Cholera in Paris, 1832, trans. Arthur Goldhammer, Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT Press, 1982, p. 199.

2 Lane, Joan, A Social History of Medicine: Health, Healing and Disease in England, 1750–1950, London, Routledge, 2001, pp. 145–48Google Scholar.

3 Benedict, Carol, ‘Policing the Sick: Plague and the Origins of State Medicine in Late Imperial China’, Late Imperial China, 14 (2), 1993, pp. 60–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Benedict, Carol, Bubonic Plague in Nineteenth-Century China, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1996, pp. 133–35Google Scholar.

5 Ljungstedt, Anders, A Historical Sketch of the Portuguese Settlements in China and of the Roman Catholic Church and Mission in China, Hong Kong, Viking Hong Kong Publications, 1992, pp. 215–16Google Scholar; Ki Che Leung, Angela, Leprosy in China: A History, New York, Columbia University Press, 2009, pp. 97, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Quoted from Benedict, Bubonic Plague in Nineteenth-Century China, p. 135.

7 Rankin, Mary, Elite Activism and Political Transformation in China, Zhejiang Province, 1865–1911, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1986, p. 106Google Scholar.

8 Benedict, Bubonic Plague in Nineteenth-Century China, pp. 133–35; Tsin, Michael, Nation, Governance, and Modernity in China: Canton, 1900–1927, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 1999, pp. 24Google Scholar, 28–29, 49; Rhoads, Edward, China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895–1913, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1975, pp. 208, 247Google Scholar. The ‘nine charitable halls’ were Aiyu, Liangyue Guangren, Fangbian, Guangji, Chongzheng, Shushan, Mingde, Huixing, and Runshen. See Yan, Xiong, ‘Jiushantang yu Qingmo minchu Guangzhou shehui (The Nine Charitable Halls and Guangzhou Society in the Late Qing and Early Republican Periods)’, in South China Research Center (ed.), Jingying wenhua (Managing Culture), Hong Kong, Xianggang jiaoyu tushu gongsi, 1999, pp. 346–70Google Scholar.

9 Hu Xuanming served as the associate secretary of the Joint Council on Public Health Education formed by the National Medical Association of China (NMAC), the Young Men's Christian Association (YMCA), and the China Medical Missionary Association (CMMA) before he joined the Guangzhou municipal government. For more about Hu, see Bu, Liping, ‘Social Darwinism, Public Health and Modernization in China, 1895–1925’, in Borowy, Iris (ed.), Uneasy Encounters: The Politics of Medicine and Health in China, 1900–1937, Frankfurt am Maim, Peter Lang, 2009, pp. 110–11Google Scholar.

10 Teng, C. T., A Review and Forecast of Public Health Administration in Canton, Guangzhou, Guangzhoushi zhengfu, 1935, p. 8Google Scholar; Tsin, Michael, ‘Canton Remapped’, in Esherick, Joseph (ed.), Remaking the Chinese City: Modernity and National Identity, Honolulu, University of Hawai'i Press, 2000, p. 24Google Scholar.

11 Of the four divisions set up at the beginning—sanitation, epidemic prevention, public health education, and statistics—the latter two were soon abolished. In 1927, the Bureau decided to strengthen its services by restructuring itself and increasing the number of branches to three. The branches under the new configuration were health maintenance, epidemic prevention, and medical services. See Teng, Public Health Administration in Canton, pp. 1–2.

12 Teng, Public Health Administration in Canton, p. 16; Guangzhou minguo ribao, 11 December 1931, p. 2:2; 8 June 1932, p. 2:1. For the importance of human waste in public health, see Rogask, Ruth, Hygienic Modernity: Meanings of Health and Disease in Treaty-Port China, Berkeley, University of California Press, 2004, p. 176Google Scholar. For details of human waste management in Guangzhou in the 1920s and 1930s, see Shuk-wah, Poon, ‘Minguo shiqi Guangzhou de fenhui chuli yu chengshi shenghuo (Human Waste Management and Urban Life in Republican Guangzhou)’, Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, 59, 2008, p. 67–95Google Scholar.

13 Starling, Arthur, Hong Kong Museum of Medical Sciences Society, Plague, SARS and the Story of Medicine in Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong University Press, 2006, p. 135Google Scholar; Teng, Public Health Administration in Canton, p. 8; Wong, K. Chimin and Lien-Teh, Wu, History of Chinese Medicine: Being a Chronicle of Medical Happenings in China from Ancient Times to the Present Period, Tientsin [Tianjin], Tientsin Press, Ltd., 1932, p. 434Google Scholar.

14 See Choa, G. H., ‘Heal the Sick’ was their Motto: The Protestant Medical Missionaries in China, Hong Kong, Chinese University Press, 1990Google Scholar; Florence Bretelle-Establet, ‘From Extending French Colonial Control to Safeguarding National Prestige: The French Medical Dispensaries in Southern China,’ in Borowy (ed.), Uneasy Encounters, p. 82.

15 For example, Liang Peiji (1875–1947), who graduated from Canton Hospital's medical school in 1897, founded a medical school in Guangzhou in 1908 and opened a luxurious sanatorium in the 1920s. Another prominent example is Liang Yiwen (1903–1991) who entered Hackett Medical College for Women in 1918 and later became one of the top physicians in obstetrics and gynaecology in China. See Yizhuang, Li, ‘Re'ai zuguo de minzu gongyejia Liang Peiji (Liang Peiji: A Patriotic Entrepreneur of Nationalistic Enterprises)’, Guangzhou wenshi ziliao, 35, 1986, pp. 166Google Scholar, 172–75; zhengxie, Liwan [Political Consultative Committee of Liwan], ‘Fuchan ke junjia Liang Yiwen (Liang Yiwen: A Specialist in Obstetrics and Gynaecology)’, Guangzhou wenshi ziliao, 45, 1993, pp. 81–87Google Scholar.

16 The French School of Medicine ceased to exist when the French consul refused to register the school with the Nationalist government in 1927. Bretelle-Establet, ‘From Extending French Colonial Control to Safeguarding National Prestige’, p. 82.

17 Borowy, ‘Introduction’, in Borowy (ed.), Uneasy Encounters, p. 28.

18 The hospital provided free outpatient services for two hours a day in the afternoon, except during holidays. See shizhengfu, Guangzhou [Guangzhou municipal government], Guangzhou zhinan (A Guide to Guangzhou), Guangzhou, Guangzhou shizhengfu, 1934, p. 324Google Scholar.

19 Jewell, J. A., ‘The Development of Chinese Health Care, 1911–49’, in Hillier, S. M. and Jewell, J. A. (eds), Health Care and Traditional Medicine in China, 1800–1982, London, Routledge, 1983, p. 45Google Scholar.

20 Shan, Liang, Jian, Li and Kemo, Zhang, Zhongshan daxue xiaoshi, 1924–1949 (A History of Sun Yat-sen University, 1924–1949), Shanghai, Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe, 1983, pp. 62–64Google Scholar; Xiangxiang, Wu and Shaotang, Liu (eds), Guoli Zhongshan daxue xiankuang (The Present Situation of the National Sun Yat-sen University), Taibei, Zhuanji wenxue chubanshe, 1971, pp. 231–32; 237Google Scholar; Shizhong, Huang (ed.), Lao Zhongda de gushi (Stories of Sun Yat-sen University), [Nanjing], Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe, 1998, p. 170Google Scholar. No. 1 Affiliated Hospital, which was much larger than No. 2 Affiliated Hospital, had a capacity of 190 beds, of which 10 were reserved for the poor free of charge. The hospital also provided free medical services in the afternoon on a daily basis.

21 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 25 April 1929, p. 5; 3 May 1929, p. 5.

22 Croizier, Ralph C., Traditional Medicine in Modern China: Science, Nationalism, and the Tensions of Cultural Change, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1968, pp. 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar, 133–34.

23 Yuehua bao, 29 March 1930, p. 5; 20 August 1931, p. 5.

24 Wong and Wu, History of Chinese Medicine, p. 493.

25 Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 396 (30 June), 1932, p. 112.

26 Strathern, Paul, A Brief History of Medicine from Hippocrates to Gene Therapy, London, Constable and Robinson Ltd., 2005, pp. 302–03Google Scholar.

27 Wong and Wu, History of Chinese Medicine, pp. 106–08; MacPherson, Kerrie, ‘Cholera in China, 1820–1930: An Aspect of the Internationalization of Infectious Disease’, in Elvin, Mark and Ts'ui-jung, Liu (eds), Sediments of Time: Environment and Society in Chinese History, Cambridge; New York, Cambridge University Press, 1998, p. 513Google Scholar. Lai Wen and Li Yongchen's study of epidemics in South China in Imperial times offers a detailed account of medical practitioners’ treatment of cholera epidemics in the nineteenth century, but gives very little information about the responses of the local government and community to the disease. See Wen, Lai and Yongchen, Li, Lingnan wenyi shi (A History of Epidemics in Lingnan), Guangzhou, Guangdong renmin chubanshe, 2004, pp. 696–705Google Scholar.

28 Inspectorate General of Customs, Decennial Reports, 1912–1921, Washington, D.C., Center for Chinese Research Materials, Association of Research Libraries, 1969, p. 227; Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 21 (18 July), 1921, pp. 22–24; 28 (5 September), 1921, pp. 6–7.

29 ‘Medical and Sanitary Report for the Year 1932 by A. R. Wellington, Director of Medical and Sanitary Services’, CO 129/545.

30 Kōain, Shina ni okeru korera ryūkō no tenbō (Prospects of Cholera Epidemics in China), Tokyo, Kōain, 1940, p. 17.

31 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 19 June 1932, p. 2:2; Yuehua bao, 26 June 1932, p. 5.

32 Henriot, Christian, Shanghai, 1927–1937: Municipal Power, Locality, and Modernization, Berkeley, University of California Press, 1993, p. 94Google Scholar.

33 Shenbao, 29 May 1932, p. 11. Zhongyang ribao, 3 June 1932, p. 2:3; 12 June 1932, p. 2:3; 15 June 1932, p. 2:3. For the relationship between cholera outbreaks and socio-economic changes in Shanghai, see Cheng, Hu, ‘Xiandaixing jingji kuozhang yu liexing chuanranbing de kuaquyu liuxing – Shanghai, Dongbei faofa de shuyi, huoluan wei zhongxin de guancha, 1902–1932 (Modernized Economic Expansion and the Interregional Spread of Epidemics: Plague and Cholera in Shanghai and Manchuria, 1902–1932)’, Bulletin of the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, 51, 2006, pp. 91–129Google Scholar.

34 American Council, Institute of Pacific Affairs, ‘Memorandum on International Cooperation in China's Public Health’, Memorandum (Institute of Pacific Relations, American Council), 2 (9), 1933, pp. 2–3; Wong and Wu, History of Chinese Medicine, p. 517. According to Iris Borowy, the League of Nations started a vigorous campaign against cholera in Shanghai in 1930, which included free vaccinations and the control of drinking water. See Iris Borowy, ‘Thinking Big: League of Nations Efforts towards a Reformed National Health System in China’, in Borowy (ed.), Uneasy Encounters, pp. 210, 218.

35 Shenbao, 24 May 1932, p. 13. In nineteenth century Japan, cholera was translated into katakana as ‘korera’ and into kanji as ‘huliela’. See, for example, Hidekata, Toyozumi (ed.), Ryuko korera byōron (A Study on Cholera Epidemics), Tokyo, Tōkei Shoin, 1883Google Scholar.

36 Zhongyang ribao, 3 July 1932, p. 2:3.

37 Yuehua bao, 6 June 1932, p. 5. Hu Cheng nonetheless suggests that, as in the past, the 1932 cholera outbreak in China spread from Guangzhou to Shanghai. See his ‘Xiandaixing jingji kuozhang’, pp. 100–01.

38 Yuehua bao, 17 June 1932, p. 5.

39 Yuehua bao, 11 June 1932, p. 5; 14 June 1932, p. 5. Guangzhou minguo ribao, 18 June 1932, p. 2:2. The nine hospitals included the municipal hospital, No. 1 Affiliated Hospital, No. 2 Affiliated Hospital, and six private hospitals. See Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 396 (30 June), 1932, p. 86.

40 Yuehua bao, 9 June 1932, p. 5.

41 Yuehua bao, 11 June 1932, p. 5; 15 June 1932, p. 5.

42 Yuehua bao, 22 June 1932, p. 5. It is interesting to note that contemporary sources believed that the 1913 cholera outbreak in Guangzhou was spread by watermelons. See Inspectorate General of Customs, Decennial Reports, 1912–1921, p. 227.

43 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 7 July 1932, p. 2:1. For more cases believed to be caused by lychees, see Guangzhou minguo ribao, 16 June 1932, p. 2:1; 20 June 1932, p. 4; 4 July 1932, p. 2:2.

44 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 5 July 1932, p. 2:1.

45 Yuehua bao, 21 June 1932, p. 5. Guangzhou minguo ribao, 1 July 1932, p. 3:1; 9 July 1932, p. 3:1.

46 Zhongyang ribao, 3 June 1932, p. 2:3; 12 June 1932, p. 2:3; 15 June 1932, p. 2:3. Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 400 (10 August), 1932, pp. 83–113.

47 Zhongyang ribao, 28 June 1932, p. 2:2.

48 Yuehua bao, 21 June 1932, p. 5.

49 Yuehua bao, 20 June 1932, p. 5.

50 Yu, Lu, ‘Guangzhou de Fangbian Yiyuan (The Fangbian Hospital of Guangzhou)’, Guangdong wenshi ziliao, 8, 1963, pp. 139–50Google Scholar.

51 According to the figures announced in 1933, in 1932 the Fangbian Hospital offered medical treatment for over 20,000 in-patients, delivery services for over 3,000 pregnant women, and buried over 2,000 unattended dead. See Guohua bao, 1 September 1933.

52 Tsin, Nation, Governance, and Modernity, pp. 33–36; Guohua bao, 19 November 1947, p. 1:2.

53 Yuehua bao, 14 June 1932, p. 5; 20 June 1932, p. 5.

54 Yuehua bao, 20 June 1932, p. 4. Guangzhou minguo ribao, 25 June 1932, p. 2:2.

55 Yuehua bao, 28 June 1932, p. 1.

56 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 26 June 1932, p. 2:2.

57 It is interesting to note that the deplorable situation in Guangzhou indirectly helped to strengthen the political authority of the Hong Kong colonial government among the local Chinese. In an editorial printed in Wah Kiu Daily, one of the leading Chinese newspapers in Hong Kong, the author expressed gratitude to the Hong Kong government ‘for the preventive measures [against cholera] to protect the health of the residents [of Hong Kong]’, which effectively prevented the epidemic from spreading there. See Wah Kiu Daily, 28 June 1932, p. 1:2.

58 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 29 June 1932, p. 2:2.

59 Yuehua bao, 24 June 1932, p. 8.

60 Yuehua bao, 25 June 1932, p. 1; 28 June 1932, p. 1; 30 June 1932, p. 1.

61 ‘Liste des étudiants de l.Institut franco-chinois de Lyon (IFCL)’, <http://www.bm-lyon.fr/trouver/Fonds_chinois/ressources/IFCL-Liste-etudiants.pdf>, [accessed 13 January 2010].

62 Guangzhou Municipal Archives, 4-01/1/215-1, p. 78.

63 Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 396 (30 June), 1932, p. 64.

64 Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 396 (30 June), 1932, p. 64.

65 Yuehua bao, 20 June 1932, p. 5.

66 Yuehua bao, 22 June 1932, p. 5. Guangzhou minguo ribao, 3 July 1932, p. 2:2.

67 Yuehua bao, 15 June 1932, p. 5; 17 June 1932, p. 5; 21 June 1932, p. 4. Guangzhou minguo ribao, 22 June 1932, p. 2:2.

68 Yuehua bao, 25 June 1932, p. 5.

69 Guangzhou Municipal Archives, 4–01/1/215–2, p. 133.

70 Teng, Public Health Administration in Canton, p. 8.

71 F, Frederick. Cartwright, Disease and History, Stroud, Sutton, 2004, pp. 138–41Google Scholar.

72 Quoted from MacPherson, Kerrie L., A Wilderness of Marshes: The Origins of Public Health in Shanghai, 1843–1893, New York, Oxford University Press, 1987, p. 121Google Scholar.

73 Rogaski, Hygienic Modernity, p. 211.

74 Zhongyang ribao, 3 June 1932, p. 2:3; 21 June 1932, p. 2:3.

75 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 20 June 1932, p. 2:2.

76 Guangzhou minguo ribao, 22 June 1932, p. 2:2.

77 Tsin, ‘Canton Remapped’, pp. 24–25; Guangxia, Deng, Guangzhoushi zhi zilaishui (Running Water in Guangzhou), Guangzhou, Guangzhou Municipal Government, 1934, pp. 1–22Google Scholar; Shuming, Ye, Guangzhou jiushi (Past Events of Guangzhou), Guangzhou, Nanfang ribao chubanshe, 1999, pp. 93–99Google Scholar. The Zengbu Waterworks, now known as the Xicun Waterworks, is still operating and provides over 40 per cent of the water consumed by the people of Guangzhou. See weiyuanhui, Guangzhou baike quanshu bianhui, Guangzhou baike quanshu (Guangzhou Encyclopedia), Beijing, Zhongguo dabaike quanshu chubanshe, 1994, pp. 748–49Google Scholar.

78 Deng, Guangzhou shi zhi zilaishui, pp. 1–22, 36; Guangzhou minguo ribao, 11 December 1931, p. 2:2; Lee, Edward Bing-Shuey, Modern Canton, Shanghai, The Mercury Press, 1936, pp. 66–67Google Scholar; Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 400 (10 August), 1932, pp. 128–44; 401 (20 August) 1932, pp. 93–113.

79 Li Shufen, ‘Weisheng ji Guangdong weisheng zhi xingzheng (Health and Health Administration in Guangdong)’, quoted in Zhou Ruikun, ‘Gonggong weisheng yu Guangzhou chengshi xiandai hua, 1901–1930s (Public Health and the Modernization of Guangzhou, 1901–1930s)’, MPhil thesis, National Chengchi University, 2003, pp. 49–50.

80 Huazi ribao, 25 June 1932, p. 2:2. The news report does not specify the ingredients in the bleaching powder the waterworks used.

81 Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 415 (10 January), 1933, p. 64.

82 The Municipal Council was an elected self-governing body. In 1933, the Municipal Council of Guangzhou comprised 70 elected councillors. Twenty-four of them represented their occupational groups and the remaining 46 councillors represented the 23 districts of Guangzhou, with each of the districts represented by two elected councillors. The council was convened every six months. Yuehua bao, 20 November 1933, p. 5. Guangzhou Municipal Archives, 4-01/2/2, p. 144.

83 Guangzhou Municipal Archives, 4-01/2/2, pp. 88, 91.

84 Guangzhou Municipal Government Gazette, 430 (10 June), 1933, p. 86; 433 (10 July), 1933, pp. 59–60; 472 (10 August), 1934, p. 118; 477 (30 September), 1934, p. 93; 532 (10 April), 1936, pp. 115–16.

85 Hardy, Anne, ‘Water and the Search for Public Health in London in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries’, Medical History, 28 (3), 1984, pp. 271–72CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

86 Evans, Richard J., Death in Hamburg: Society and Politics in the Cholera Years, 1830–1910, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, pp. 144–60Google Scholar.

87 MacPherson, ‘Cholera in China, 1820–1930’, p. 515.