Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:51:07.951Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

LEOPOLD RANKE'S ARCHIVAL TURN: LOCATION AND EVIDENCE IN MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHY*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

KASPER RISBJERG ESKILDSEN
KASPER RISBJERG ESKILDSEN*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Science Studies, Roskilde University, Denmark
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

From 1827 to 1831 the German historian Leopold von Ranke travelled through Germany, Austria, and Italy, hunting for documents and archives. During this journey Ranke developed a new model for historical research that transformed the archive into the most important site for the production of historical knowledge. Within the archive, Ranke claimed, the trained historian could forget his personal predispositions and political loyalties, and write objective history. This essay critically examines Ranke's model for historical research through a study of the obstacles, frustrations, and joys that he encountered on his journey. It shows how Ranke's archival experiences inspired him to re-evaluate his own identity as a historian and as a human being, and investigates some of the affiliations between his model for historical research and the political realities of Prince Metternich's European order. Finally, the essay compares Ranke's historical discipline to other nineteenth-century disciplines, such as anthropology and archaeology.

Type
Articles
Information
Modern Intellectual History , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , November 2008 , pp. 425 - 453
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Also Schroeder, P. W., The Transformation of European Politics 1763–1848 (Oxford, 1994), 666–711Google Scholar.

2 von Ranke, L., Das Briefwerk, ed. Fuchs, W. P. (Hamburg, 1949), 222, 223–4, 231–2Google Scholar. All translations, unless otherwise noted, are my own.

3 Also von Laue, T. H., Leopold Ranke: The Formative Years (Princeton, NJ, 1950), 89–108Google Scholar; Baur, S., Versuch über die Historik des jungen Ranke (Berlin, 1998), 123–55Google Scholar; and Toews, J. E., Becoming Historical: Cultural Reformation and Public Memory in Early Nineteenth-Century Berlin (Cambridge, 2004), 374–80Google Scholar.

4 von Gentz, F., Briefe von und an Friedrich von Gentz, ed. Wittichen, F. C., 4 vols. (Munich, 1909–13), 1: 345Google Scholar.

5 Ranke, L., Ueber die Verschwörung gegen Venedig, im Jahre 1618. Mit Urkunden aus dem Venezianischen Archive (Berlin, 1831)Google Scholar.

6 Few Ranke scholars have found the book interesting enough for further analysis. One exception is Leonard Krieger, who reads it as a reaction to the July Revolution and as an overtly political book. However, Krieger admits “the absence of any explicit testimony from Ranke.” Krieger, L., Ranke: The Meaning of History (Chicago, IL, 1977), 148–9, 148Google Scholar. On Ranke and Venice see also Tucci, U., “Ranke Storico di Venezia,” in Ranke, L., Venezia nel Cinquecento, trans. Walter, Ingeborg Zapperi (Rome, 1974), 1–69Google Scholar.

7 Ranke, Briefwerk, 231.

8 von Ranke, L., Neue Briefe, ed. Hoeft, B. (Hamburg, 1949), 158Google Scholar.

9 Ranke's “exercises” (Übungen) were not connected to an institutionalized seminar and, thus, were not called a seminar. During the second half of the nineteenth century his former students shaped German seminars after Ranke's example. “It was Ranke's fortunate idea,” Wilhelm von Giesebrecht explained in 1887, “to secure the propagation of critical historical research this way; he never spoke of a seminar himself, but his exercises have become the seminar for all those seminars, which we now have at our universities.” von Giesebrecht, W., Gedächtnissrede auf Leopold von Ranke (Munich, 1887), 11Google Scholar. However, to Ranke and many of his followers, the distinction was crucial as they considered the teaching environment of institutionalized seminars too uncontrollable and impersonal to secure proper training for future researchers. See also Eskildsen, K. R., “Leopold von Ranke, la passion de la critique et le séminaire d'historie,” in Jacob, C., ed., Lieux de savoir: Espaces et communautés (Paris, 2007), 462–82Google Scholar.

10 See, for example, Meinecke, F., Die Entstehung des Historismus (Munich, 1936)Google Scholar; Shulin, E., Ranke und Hegel (Munich, 1928)Google Scholar; Hinrichs, C., Ranke und die Geschichtstheologie der Goethezeit (Göttingen, 1954)Google Scholar; Iggers, G. G., The German Conception of History: The National Tradition of History (Middletown, CT, 1968)Google Scholar; and White, H., Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore, MD, 1973)Google Scholar.

11 Toews, Becoming Historical, 373.

12 See, for example, Novick, P., That Noble Dream: The “Objectivity Question” and the American Historical Profession (Cambridge, 1988), 21–46 and 573–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Iggers, G. G., Historiography in the Twentieth Century: From Scientific Objectivity to the Postmodern Challenge (Middletown, CT, 1997), 141–7Google Scholar. On the image of Ranke see Iggers, G. G., “The Image of Ranke in American and German Historical Thought,” History and Theory 2/1 (1962), 17–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 See, for example, the two volumes published after the hundredth anniversary of Ranke's death in 1986: Mommsen, W., ed., Leopold von Ranke und die Moderne Geschichtswissenschaft (Stuttgart, 1988)Google Scholar; and Iggers, G. G. et al. , eds., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline (Syracuse, NY, 1990)Google Scholar. Despite their titles, both volumes concentrate upon Ranke's contexts instead of his role in the shaping of the historical discipline. None of the articles describe his archival research practices, his source criticism, or his exercises. One exception, focusing upon gender and practice, is Smith, B. G., The Gender of History: Men, Women, and Historical Practice (Cambridge, MA, 1998), esp. 103–29Google Scholar. Also Müller, P., “Geschichte machen. Überlegungen zur lokal-spezifischen Praktiken in der Geschichtswissenschaften und ihrer epistemischen Bedeutung im 19. Jahrhundert. Ein Literaturbericht,” Historische Anthropologie 12/3 (2004), 415–33Google Scholar.

14 D. Cahan, “Institutions and Communities,” in idem, ed., From Natural Philosophy to the Sciences: Writing the History of Nineteenth-Century Science (Chicago, IL, 2003), 291–328. On sites of knowledge production see also Livingstone, D., Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge (Chicago, IL, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jardine, N., The Scenes of Inquiry: On the Reality of Questions in the Sciences (Oxford, 2000), esp. 274–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ophir, A. and Shapin, S., “The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey,” Science in Context 4/1 (1991), 3–21Google Scholar; and Shapin, S., “Placing the View from Nowhere: Historical and Sociological Problems in the Location of Science,” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 12 (1998), 5–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Holmes, F. L., “The Complementarity of Teaching and Research in Liebig's Laboratory,” Osiris 2/5 (1989), 121–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Olesko, K. M., Physics as a Calling: Discipline and Practice in the Königsberg Seminar for Physics (Ithaca, NY, 1991)Google Scholar.

16 Jensen, J., Thomsens museum: historien om Nationalmuseet (Copenhagen, 1992)Google Scholar; Zimmerman, A., Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany (Chicago, IL, 2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Penny, H. G., Objects of Culture: Ethnology and Ethnographic Museums in Imperial Germany (Chapel Hill, NC, 2002)Google Scholar. Nineteenth-century museums were not only important for the formation of disciplines, but also for the institutionalization and control of collective memory. For discussions of these questions in a German context see Crane, S. A., Collecting and Historical Consciousness in Early Nineteenth-Century Germany (Ithaca, NY, 2000)Google Scholar; Sheehan, J. J., Museums in the German Art World (Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar; and Ernst, W., Im Namen der Geschichte: Sammeln—Speichern—Er/Zählen. Infrastrukturelle Konfiguration des deutschen Gedächtnisses (Munich, 2003)Google Scholar.

17 Knowles, D., Great Historical Enterprises: Problems in Monastic History (London, 1963), 65–97Google Scholar; and Ernst, Im Namen der Geschichte, 91–189.

18 Kohler, R. E., “Place and Practice in Field Biology,” History of Science 11 (2002), 189–210, 192CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Also Kohler, R. E., Landscapes and Labscapes: Exploring the Field–Lab Boundary (Chicago, IL, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Kohler, R. E. and Kuklick, H., “Introduction,” Osiris 2/11 (1996), 1–14Google Scholar. The localness of the archive has often been noticed. Especially in recent years, considerable attention has been given to archives as places of imagination, desire, and political control, much of this work inspired by Jacques Derrida's Mal d'archive: Un Impression freudienne (Paris, 1995). History of the Human Sciences dedicated two special issues to the topic in 1998 and 1999 (11/4 and 12/2), so did Poetics Today in 2003 (24/4). For recent overviews see Steedman, C., Dust: The Archive and Cultural History (New Brunswick, NJ, 2002)Google Scholar; and Burton, A., ed., Archive Stories: Facts, Fictions, and the Writing of History (Durham, NC, 2005), esp. 1–24Google Scholar. For an overview of the theoretical discussion see Ernst, W., Das Rumoren der Archive: Ordnung aus Unordnung (Berlin, 2002)Google Scholar.

19 Recently in Dear, P., The Intelligibility of Nature: How Science Makes Sense of the World (Chicago, IL, 2006), esp. 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Outram, D., “New Spaces in Natural History,” in Jardine, N. et al. , eds., Cultures of Natural History (Cambridge, 1996), 249–65Google Scholar; and Rudwick, M., Bursting the Limits of Time: Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution (Chicago, 2005), 37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

21 On the relationship between philosophically inclined universal histories and empirical evidence see also de Certeau, M., “Writing vs. Time: History and Anthropology in the Works of Lafitau,” Yale French Studies 59 (1980), 37–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Harbsmeier, M., “World Histories before Domestication: The Writing of Universal Histories, Histories of Mankind and World Histories in Late Eighteenth-Century Germany,” Culture and History 5 (1989), 93–131Google Scholar; Pagden, A., “Eighteenth-Century Anthropology and the ‘History of Mankind’,” in Kelley, D. R., ed., History and the Disciplines: The Reclassification of Knowledge in Early Modern Europe (Rochester, NY, 1997), 223–33Google Scholar; and Griggs, T., “Universal History from Counter-Reformation to the Enlightenment,” Modern Intellectual History 4/2 (2007), 219–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22 For example Schiller, F., Was heißt und zu welchem Ende studiert man Universalgeschichte? Eine akademische Antrittsrede bey Eröfnung seiner Vorlesungen (Jena, 1789)Google Scholar.

23 Rössler, E. F., ed., Die Gründung der Universität Göttingen: Entwürfe, Berichte und Briefe der Zeitgenossen (Göttingen, 1855), 460Google Scholar.

24 Vierhaus, R., “Die Universität Göttingen und die Anfänge der modernen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert,” in Boockmann, H. et al. , eds., Geschichtswissenschaft in Göttingen (Göttingen, 1987), 9–29Google Scholar. Also Reill, P. H., The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism (Berkeley, CA, 1975)Google Scholar; Bödeker, H. E. et al. , eds., Aufklärung und Geschichte: Studien zur deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert (Göttingen, 1985)Google Scholar; Muhlack, Ulrich, Geschichtswissenschaft im Humanismus und in der Aufklärung: Der Vorgeschichte des Historismus (Munich, 1991)Google Scholar; and Stuchtey, B. et al. , eds., British and German Historiography 1750–1850 (Oxford, 2000)Google Scholar.

25 Schlözer, A. L., Vorstellung seiner Universal-Historie, 2 vols. (Göttingen, 1772–3), 1: 67Google Scholar. In later editions, however, he discarded the expression “prehistory” and instead used “original world” (Urwelt), from Adam to Noah, and “preworld” (Vorwelt), from Noah to the reign of Cyrus the Great of Persia. On the concept of prehistory see U. Kösser, “Vorgeschichte,” in J. Ritter et al., eds., Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie, 13 vols. (1971–2007), 11: 1186–8; Zedelmaier, H., Der Anfang der Geschichte: Studien zur Ursprungsdebatte im 18. Jahrhundert (Hamburg, 2003), esp. 177–83Google Scholar; and Kelley, D., “The Rise of Prehistory,” Journal of World History 14/1 (2003), 1–40Google Scholar.

26 Schlözer, Vorstellung, 1: 15.

27 Also A. L. Schlözer, “On Historiography,” trans. H. D. Schmidt, History and Theory 18/1 (1979).

28 Schlözer, Vorstellung, 1: 15.

29 Ibid., 1: 21.

30 Ibid., 1: 18.

31 Ibid., 1: 44–5.

32 Niebuhr, B. G., Kleine historische und philologische Schriften, 2 vols. (Bonn, 1828–43), 2: 1–19Google Scholar, quotes on 5 and 9.

33 Also Baur, Versuch über die Historik, 112–23.

34 Droysen, J. G., Briefwechsel, ed. Hübner, R., 2 vols. (Berlin, 1929), 1: 119Google Scholar.

35 von Ense, Karl August Varnhagen, Werke, ed. Feilchenfeldt, K., 5 vols. (Frankfurt am Main, 1987–94), 5: 420Google Scholar.

36 Anonymous, “Die Berliner Historiker,” Hallische Jahrbücher für deutsche Wissenschaft und Kunst 4 (1841), 421–2, 425–7, 429–39, quote on 430. Günter Berg considered Karl Friedrich Köppen, a friend of Engels and Marx, the author of this article. Siegfried Baur has recently proposed Arnold Ruge as another possibility. Berg, G., Leopold Ranke als akademischer Lehrer: Studien zu seinen Vorlesungen und seinem Geschichtsdenken (Göttingen, 1968), 57Google Scholar; and Baur, Versuch über die Historik, 31, note 48.

37 Also, J. Pelikan, “Leopold von Ranke as Historian of the Reformation: What Ranke did for the Reformation – What the Reformation did for Ranke,” in Iggers et al., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline, 89–98.

38 Also G. Benzoni, “Ranke's Favorite Source: The Venetian Relazioni Impressions with Allusions to Later Historiography,” in Iggers et al., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline, 45–57.

39 Ranke, Briefwerk, 84–5.

40 Ranke, L., Fürsten und Völker von Süd-Europa im sechszehnten und siebzehnten Jahrhundert. Vornehmlich aus ungedruckten Gesandtschafts-Berichten (Hamburg, 1827)Google Scholar.

41 Ranke, Briefwerk, 156–63.

42 Ranke, Fürsten und Völker, viii.

43 For a recent historiographical overview see Mackenney, R., “‘A Plot Discover'd.’ Myth, Legend, and the ‘Spanish’ Conspiracy against Venice in 1618,” in Martin, J. et al. , eds., Venice Reconsidered: The History and Civilization of an Italian City-State 1297–1797 (Baltimore, MD, 2000), 185–216Google Scholar.

44 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 1.

45 Also C. Povolo, “The Creation of Venetian Historiography,” in Martin et al., Venice Reconsidered, 491–519. On the role and political significance of Spain in Italian historiography see also Musi, A., ed., Alle origini di una nazione: Antispagnolismo e identità italiana (Milan, 2003)Google Scholar.

46 Also Hammerstein, N., “Der Anteil des 18. Jahrhunderts an der Ausbildung der historischen Schule des 19. Jahrhunderts,” in Hammer, K. et al. , eds., Historische Forschung im 18. Jahrhundert (Bonn, 1976), 432–50Google Scholar; and U. Muhlack, “Historie und Philologie,” in Bödeker et al., Aufklärung und Geschichte, 49–81.

47 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 12.

48 Ibid., 17.

49 Ibid., 52.

50 von Ranke, L., Aus Werk und Nachlass, ed. Fuchs, W. P., 4 vols. (Munich, 1964–75), 4: 84Google Scholar.

51 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 53–62. Also Minutelli, R., “Archivi e biblioteche,” in Isnenghi, M. et al. , eds., Storia di Venezia: L'Ottocento e il novecento, 3 vols. (Rome, 2002), 2: 1081–122Google Scholar, esp. 1084–92; and Povolo, C., Il romanziere e l'archivista. De un processo veneziano del '600 all'anonimo manoscritto dei Promessi Sposi (Venice, 1993), esp. 71–95Google Scholar.

52 Shapin, S. and Schaffer, S., Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life (Princeton, NJ, 1989), 60–5Google Scholar.

53 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 54.

54 Tollebeek, J., “Seeing the Past with the Mind's Eye: The Consecration of the Romantic Historian,” Clio: A Journal of Literature, History and the Philosophy of History 29/2 (2000), 167–91Google Scholar.

55 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 54–5.

56 Ibid., 44.

57 Ibid., 1.

58 Ibid., 53.

59 Ibid., 57.

60 Ranke, Briefwerk, 121–2, 131–2, 172, 194.

61 Also Brenner, P. J., Der Reisebericht in der deutschen Literatur: Eine Forschungsüberblick als Vorstudie zu einer Gattungsgeschichte (Tübingen, 1990), 329–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

62 N. Jardine, “Naturphilosophie and the Kingdoms of Nature,” in idem et al., Cultures of Natural History, 230–45, quote on 231.

63 Also Muhlack, U., “Leopold Ranke, seine Geschichtsschreibung und seine Briefe,” in von Ranke, L., Briefwechsel. Historisch-kritische Ausgabe, ed. Muhlack, U. et al. (Munich, 2007), 1: 3–49Google Scholar.

64 Ranke, Briefwerk, 128, 130, 154–5, 186–7, 208.

65 Ibid., 115.

66 Ibid., 121–2.

67 Ibid., 123.

68 Ibid., 126.

69 Also Ziolkowski, T., German Romanticism and Its Institutions (Princeton, NJ, 1990), 18–63Google Scholar.

70 Ranke, Neue Briefe, 108, n. 2.

71 Ranke, Briefwerk, 164.

72 Ibid., 195.

73 Ibid., 214.

74 Ibid., 203.

75 Ibid., 206.

76 Tollebeek, J., “‘Turn'd to Dust and Tears’: Revisiting the Archive,” History and Theory 43 (2004), 237–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

77 Also Daston, L., “Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective,” Social Studies of Science 22 (1992), 597–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

78 Eskildsen, “Leopold von Ranke.”

79 von Sybel, H., Vorträge und Abhandlungen (Munich, 1897), 302Google Scholar.

80 Waitz, G., Die historischen Übungen zu Göttingen. Glückwunschschreiben an Leopold von Ranke zum Tage der Feier seines funfzigjährigen Doctorjubiläums. 20. Februar 1867 (Göttingen, 1867), 3Google Scholar.

81 Giesebrecht, Gedächtnissrede auf Leopold von Ranke, 14–15.

82 For example Kammerhofer, L., “Die Gründung des Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchivs 1749,” in Csáky, M. et al. , eds., Speicher des Gedächtnisses: Bibliotheken, Museen, Archive, 2 vols. (Vienna, 2001), 2: 81–99Google Scholar; and Ernst, Im Namen der Geschichte, 586–613.

83 J. S. Milligan, “‘What is an Archive?’ in the History of Modern France,” in Burton, Archive Stories, 159–83, quote on 161.

84 Koser, R., ed., Die Neuordnung des Preussischen Archivwesens durch den Staatskanzler Fürsten von Hardenberg (Leipzig, 1904), 6Google Scholar.

85 Ibid., 6.

86 Ibid., 21.

87 Bittner, L., Gesamtinventar des Wiener Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchivs, 5 vols. (Vienna, 1936–40), 1: 163–9, 167Google Scholar.

88 Ibid, 1: 175–80.

89 Ranke, Briefwerk, 171.

90 Ibid., 119.

91 Ibid., 111.

92 Ibid., 191; and Bittner, Gesamtinventar, 1: 182.

93 Ranke, Briefwerk, 171.

94 Dorn, B., Friedrich von Gentz und Europa: Studien zu Stabilität und Revolution 1802–1822 (Bonn, 1993)Google Scholar; and Kronenbitter, G., Wort und Macht: Friedrich Gentz als politischer Schriftsteller (Berlin, 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

95 Bittner, Gesamtinventar, 1: 182–3.

96 Ranke, Briefwerk, 126–7.

97 von Ranke, L., Sämmtliche Werke, 54 vols. (Leipzig, 1867–90), 53/54: 181Google Scholar.

98 Bittner, Gesamtinventar, 1: 182–3.

99 Ranke, Neue Briefe, 109.

100 Ibid., 110.

101 Ranke, Briefwerk, 169–70. Also Tucci, “Ranke Storico di Venezia,” esp. 3–18; and idem, “Ranke and the Venetian Document Market,” in Iggers et al., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline, 99–107, esp. 100.

102 Ranke, Briefwerk, 126–7.

103 Ranke, Neue Briefe, 113.

104 Ibid., 137–8.

105 Ranke, Briefwerk, 220–21.

106 Ranke, Ueber die Verschwörung, 57.

107 Ranke, Briefwerk, 221.

108 Ibid., 211.

109 Heine, H., Historisch-kritische Gesamtausgabe der Werke, ed. Windfuhr, M., 23 vols. (Hamburg, 1973–97), XII(I): 70Google Scholar.

110 P. Burke, “Ranke the Reactionary,” in Iggers et al., Leopold von Ranke and the Shaping of the Historical Discipline, 36–44.

111 Anonymous, “Die Berliner Historiker,” 432.

112 See note 18.

113 Anonymous, “Die Berliner Historiker,” 431.

114 Koselleck, R., Vergangene Zukunft: Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten (Frankfurt am Main, 2000), esp. 67–86Google Scholar; and Fritzsche, P., Stranded in the Present: Modern Time and the Melancholy of History (Cambridge, MA, 2004), esp. 11–54Google Scholar.

115 Blix, G., “Charting the ‘Transitional Period’: The Emergence of Modern Time in the Nineteenth Century,” History and Theory 45/1 (2006), 51–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

116 Leonard Krieger advocated the viewpoint that Ranke late in his life turned to universal history with his unfinished Weltgeschichte. Krieger, Ranke: The Meaning of History, 320–43. However, the topic and title of Ranke's book was not “universal history,” as it is often erroneously translated into English, but “world history.” On Ranke and historical continuity see also R. Vierhaus, “Die Idee der Kontinuität im historiographischen Werk Leopold von Rankes,” in Mommsen, Leopold von Ranke und die moderne Geschichtswissenschaft, 166–75.

117 Toews, Becoming Historical, esp. 372–418.

118 Ranke, Briefwerk, 231–2.

119 von Ranke, L., Historisch-politische Zeitschrift, 2 vols. (Hamburg, 1832–6), 1: 1–8, 2Google Scholar.

120 Ibid., 1: 1.

121 Ibid., 1: 3.

122 Ranke, Sämmtliche Werke, 51/52: 597.

123 For a recent overview see G. Lingelbach, Klio macht Karriere: Die Institutionalisierung der Geschichtswissenschaft in Frankreich und den USA in der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts (Göttingen, 2003).

124 Also Callmer, J. et al. , Die Anfänge der ur- und frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie als akademisches Fach (1890–1930) im europäischen Vergleich (Rahden, 2006)Google Scholar.

125 Jameson, J. F. “The Influence of Universities upon Historical Writing,” University Record of the University of Chicago 6/40 (January 1902), 294–300, 297Google Scholar.

126 Eskildsen, “Leopold von Ranke.”

127 Middell, M. et al. , eds., Historische Institute im internationalen Vergleich (Leipzig, 2001)Google Scholar.

128 Jameson, “The Influence of Universities,” 300.

129 Holt, W. Stull, ed., Historical Scholarship in the United States, 1876–1901: As Revealed in the Correspondence of Herbert B. Adams (Baltimore, MD, 1938), 160Google Scholar.

130 Langlois, C.-V. and Seignobos, C., Introduction aux études historiques (Paris, 1898), 1–2Google Scholar.

131 Also Gjerløff, A. K., “Syn for sagn. Dansk arkæologi og historie i 1800-tallet,” Historisk Tidsskrift 99/2 (1999), 406–45Google Scholar; Zimmermann, A., “Geschichtslose und schriftlose Völker in Spreeathen: Anthropologie als Kritik der Geschichtswissenschaft im Kaiserreich,” Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaft 3 (1999), 197–210Google Scholar; and U. Veit, “Gründerjahre: Die Mitteleuropäische Ur- und Frühgeschichtsforschung um 1900,” in Callmer et al., Die Anfänge der ur- und frühgeschichtlichen Archäologie, 43–61.

132 Waitz, T., Ueber die Einheit des Menschengeschlechtes und den Naturzustand der Menschen (Leipzig, 1859), 8Google Scholar.

133 Worsaae, J. J. A., En Oldgrandskers Erindringer 1821–1847, ed. Hermansen, V. (Copenhagen, 1904), 64–5Google Scholar. Emphasis in the original.

134 Bastian, A., Die Vorgeschichte der Ethnologie (Berlin, 1881), 58–9Google Scholar.

135 von Ranke, L., Aus Werke und Nachlass, ed. Fuchs, W. P. et al. , 4 vols. (Munich, 1964–), 1: 166, n. 1Google Scholar.

136 Bernheim, E., Lehrbuch der Historischen Methode: Nachweis der wichtigsten Quellen und Hülfmittel zum Studium der Geschichte (Leipzig, 1889), 32Google Scholar.

137 Ranke, L., ed., Jahrbücher des Deutschen Reichs unter dem Sächsischen Hause, 3 vols. (Berlin, 1837–40)Google Scholar.

138 Auslander, L., “Beyond Words,” American Historical Review 110/4 (2005), 1015–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

139 Micro-history, Geertzian anthropology, and post-structural and postmodern theories have all contributed to a renewed interest in close readings of archival documents. Examples of influential historical narratives that focus upon the historian's personal experiences with archival documents are Davis, N. Z., Fiction in the Archives: Pardon Tales and Their Tellers in Sixteenth-Century France (Stanford, CA, 1987)Google Scholar; and Farge, A., Le Gôut de l'archive (Paris, 1989)Google Scholar. For a discussion of the role of text in recent historiographical theory see also Clark, E. A., History, Theory, Text: Historians and the Linguistic Turn (Cambridge, MA, 2004), esp. 130–55Google Scholar.