Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:38:18.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mussolini and the idealisation of Empire: the Augustan Exhibition of Romanità

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2016

Flavia Marcello
Flavia Marcello*
Affiliation:
Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Australia
*
∗ Email: flaviamarcello8@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Augustan Exhibition of Romanità, held in Rome's Palazzo delle Esposizioni between 1937 and 1938, exemplifies the aestheticisation, ritualisation and sacralisation of politics during the Fascist era in Italy. This article conducts a multi-layered spatial analysis of the exhibition that considers space as passively experienced, as an agent to re-map memory, as a mediator between intention and reception and as having both physical and mental characteristics. The relative sizes of the spaces, their sequence and their axial placement within the Palazzo's plan were the most powerful forces that conveyed the exhibition's overall political and social aims. The Mostra Augustea della Romanità (MAR) is here analysed as a form of historical representation with a specific narrative which is played out within an orchestrated space in order to create and reinforce a (Fascist) political identity. The idea of Rome took on material aspects through a kind of ‘recognition effect’ for the visitor by presenting Romanità as a collective mirror in which to view an image of their own social visage. Thus an active connection would, according to the organisers, be forged between a Roman past and a Fascist present, and its two leaders and creators, Augustus and Mussolini, as well as between the individual and society. The MAR also demonstrates the prevalence of the cult of Il Duce in Fascist society and its importance for maintaining high levels of consent. With its focus on a particular view of the ancient world, the MAR was an ephemeral event that acted as teleological justification for the advent and supposed permanence of Fascism, which at the same time presented itself as a unique archaeological, scientific and educational document of the Roman world.

Keywords

architectureexhibitionsFascismMussolini
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 2011 , pp. 223 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albertoni, M. 2004. The Capitoline museums. Rome: Electa.Google Scholar
Barbanera, M. 2000. ‘Giulio Quirino Giglioli’. Dizionario Biografico degli Italiani, ed. Caravale, M.. 709. Vol. 54.Google Scholar
Berezin, M. 1997. Making the fascist self: The political culture of interwar Italy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cagnetta, M. 1976. Augusto e la ‘rivoluzione’ fascista. Quaderni di Storia 3, no. 2: 139–82.Google Scholar
Chabod, F. 1961. L'Italia contemporanea, 1918–1948. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Claridge, A. 1998. Rome: An archaeological guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Felice, R. 1996. Mussolini il Duce. Lo stato totalitario. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Falasca-Zamponi, S. 1998. Of storytellers and master narratives: Modernity, memory, and history in fascist Italy. Social Science History 22, no. 4: 415–44.Google Scholar
Gentile, E. 2006. Politics as religion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G.Q. 1938a. Mostra Augustea della Romanità. Catalogo.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G.Q. 1938b. La mostra Augustea della Romanità. Architettura 17, no. 11: 655–66.Google Scholar
Giglioli, G.Q. 1958. Descrizione del Museo. In Il Museo della Civiltà Romana: Catalogo, Ripartizione delle antichità e belle arti del Comune di Roma, 12–39. Rome: Colombo.Google Scholar
Gradel, I. 2002. Emperor worship and Roman religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greco, A. 1987. Gli obelischi, le piazze, gli artisti: conversazione con Ludovico Quaroni, 287. In E42. Utopia e scenario del regime. Urbanistica, architettura, arte e decorazione, ed. Calvesi, M., Guidoni, E. and Lux, S., 283–7. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Il Messaggero. 1937. February 25.Google Scholar
Luce, Istituto. 1937a. Preparativi per la mostra augustea della romanità. Giornale Luce B1131, 21/07/1937. Rome: Istituto Luce. http://www.archivioluce.com/archivio/.Google Scholar
Luce, Istituto. 1937b. La mostra augustea della Romanità, Giornale Luce B1175, 29/09/1937. Rome: Istituto Luce. http://www.archivioluce.com/archivio/.Google Scholar
Luce, Istituto. 1938. La cerimonia di chiusura, presenziata da Mussolini, della ‘Mostra augustea della romanità’ a Palazzo dell' Esposizione Giornale Luce B1404, 09/11/1938 Rome: Istituto Luce. http://www.archivioluce.com/archivio/.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Liberati Silverio, A. 1990. La Mostra Augustea della Romanità. L'allestimento della facciata, il progetto e l'organizzazione delle sale, il consuntivo della manifestazione, l'eredità’. In Il Palazzo delle Esposizioni. Catalogo della mostra, 223–7. Rome: Edizioni Carte Segrete.Google Scholar
Maiuri, A. 1937. La mostra augustea della Romanità. Nuova Antologia 5: 261–66.Google Scholar
Malvano, L. 1988. Fascismo e politica dell'immagine. Turin: Boringhieri.Google Scholar
Manacorda, D. 1982. Per un 'indagine sull'archeologia italiana durante il ventennio fascista. Archeologia medievale 9: 443–7.Google Scholar
Marcello, F. 2003. Fascism and the ephemeral city: Hitler's visit to Rome. In The planned city? ISUF international conference: Proceedings of the International conference, ed. Petruccioli, A., Stella, M., and Strappa, G., 1226–30. Bari: Uniongrafica Corcelli.Google Scholar
McEwen, I.K. 2002. Vitruvius: Writing the body of architecture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McLaren, B. 2006. Architecture and tourism in Italian colonial Libya: An ambivalent modernism. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Mussolini, B. 1936, 1972. La proclamazione dell'impero. In Opera omnia. Dall'inaugurazione della provincia di Littoria alla proclamazione dell'impero. (19 December 1934–9 May 1936), ed. Susmel, E. and Susmel, D., 268–9. Florence: La Fenice. (Originally published in Il Popolo d'Italia, May 10, 1936).Google Scholar
Noccioli, M. 1987. Edificio per la mostra della romanità. In E42. Utopia e scenario del regime. Urbanistica, architettura, arte e decorazione, ed. Calvesi, M., Guidoni, E. and Lux, S., 481–84. Venice: Marsilio.Google Scholar
Pallottino, M. 1938. La mostra augustea della romanità. Capitolium 12: 519–28.Google Scholar
Pera, M. 2005. Palazzo Madama. Rome: Editalia.Google Scholar
Pisani Sartorio, G. 1991. La mostra augustea della ‘romanità’. In La capitale a Roma: città e arredo urbano: Palazzo delle esposizioni, 219–21. Rome: Edizioni Carte Segrete.Google Scholar
Scriba, F. 1995. Augustus im Schwarzhemd? – Die Mostra Augustea della Romanità in Rom 1937/38. Frankfurt: Peter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
Scriba, F. 1996. Archaeology as history – The Mostra Augustea della Romanità 1937/38 as an example of the relation between archaeology and fascism. In Archaeology, ideology, method: Inter-academy seminar on current archaeological research, ed. Gilliver, K., Ernst, W. and Scriba, F., 55–75. Rome: Canadian Academic Centre in Italy.Google Scholar
Stone, M. 1998. The patron state: Culture and politics in fascist Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Strong, E. 1939. ‘Romanità throughout the ages. Journal of Roman Studies 29, no. 2: 137–66.Google Scholar