Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T18:17:51.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Mechanical Properties and Fracture Behavior of Mg2Si after Heat Exposure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

Takashi Nakamura
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1, Niijyuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 125-8585
Ryo Inoue*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1, Niijyuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 125-8585
Shuhei Hasegawa
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1, Niijyuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 125-8585
Yauso Kogo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1, Niijyuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 125-8585
Tsutomu Iida
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Technology, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1, Niijyuku, Katsushika-ku, Tokyo, Japan. 125-8585
Get access

Abstract

The mechanical properties of as-sintered and heat-exposed polycrystalline Mg2Si were investigated. The strength of the as-fabricated specimen depends on the surface flaws. After heat exposure in Ar atmosphere, oxidized products formed, mainly consisting of MgO. The strength increased after the heat exposure, and the surface oxidation product filled the surface cracks. After the surface oxidation products were removed, the strength and TE properties were the same as those of the as-fabricated specimens.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crane, D. T. and Lagrandeur, J. W., J. Elec. Mater. 39, 2142 (2010).Google Scholar
LeBlanc, S., Sustainable Mater. Technol., 1-2, 26 (2014).Google Scholar
Satyala, N. and Vashaee, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 073107 (2012).Google Scholar
de Boor, J., Dasgupta, T., Kolb, H., Compere, C., Kelm, K., and Mueller, E., Acta Mater. 77, 68 (2014).Google Scholar
Hayatsu, Y., Iida, T., Sakamoto, T., Kurosaki, S., Nishio, K., Kogo, Y., and Takanashi, Y., J. Solid. State Chem. 193, 161 (2012).Google Scholar
Perry, D. L., Handbook of Inorganic Compounds, Second Edition, (CRC Press, 2016) pp. 257.Google Scholar
Tani, J.-I., Takahashi, M., and Kido, H., J. Alloys. Compd. 488, 346 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itoh, T. and Tominaga, A., Mater. Trans. 57, 1088 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S. H., Kim, Y., and Yoo, C.-Y., Ceram. Int. 42, 10279 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Qin, X. Y., Xiong, W., and Zhu, X. G., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 459, 216 (2007).Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. D., Fan, X., Case, E. D., and Sarac, P. B., J. Mater. Sci. 50, 4034 (2015).Google Scholar
Ishikawa, M., Nakamura, T., Hirata, S., Iida, T., Nishio, K., and Kogo, Y., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 54, 07JC03 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawn, B. R. and Fuller, E. R., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 2016 (1975).Google Scholar
Lawn, B. R., Fracture of Brittle Solids, (Cambridge University press, 1993) pp. 260.Google Scholar
Milekhine, V., Onsøien, M. I., Solberg, J. K., and Skaland, T., Intermetallics 10, 743 (2002).Google Scholar
Stefanaki, E.-C., Hatzikraniotis, E., Vourlias, G., Chrissafis, K., Kitis, G., Paraskevopoulos, K. M., and Polymeris, G. S., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 47, 5146 (2016).Google Scholar
Takahashi, K., Ando, K., and Nakao, W., Crack-Healing Ability of Structural Ceramics and Methodology to Guarantee the Reliability of Ceramic Components (InTech, 2011).Google Scholar
Sakamoto, T., Iida, T., Kurosaki, S., Yano, K., Taguchi, H., Nishio, K., and Takanashi, Y., J. Elec. Mater. 40, 629 (2011).Google Scholar