Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T01:07:26.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomistic Simulation of Scratch behavior of Ceramic/Metal (CerMet) nanolaminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2017

Adnan Rasheed  and
Iman Salehinia
Adnan Rasheed
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL60115, USA
Iman Salehinia*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL60115, USA
*
*(Email: isalehinia@niu.edu)
Get access

Abstract:

The promise of nanocomposites lies in their multi-functionality, the possibility of realizing unique combinations of properties that are not attainable in traditional materials. Ceramic/metal multilayers (CMMs) are one such unique combination that are becoming increasingly popular among researchers today. The idea is to combine the superior properties of ceramics like hardness and strength with favorable properties of metal such as ductility. Materials with these characteristics have potential for engineering applications such as highly efficient gas turbines, aerospace materials, automobiles, protective coatings, etc. Molecular dynamics atomistic simulations were performed to study the scratch behavior of different models of niobium carbide (NbC)-niobium (Nb) multilayers. The layer thicknesses were varied and the coefficient of friction was calculated at various depths of indentation. The deformation mechanisms were investigated to explain the observed mechanical behavior of the models under scratching. Model with the lowest metal/ceramic thickness ratio (2nm NbC/2nm Nb) showed the highest hardness, highest scratch resistance, and also highest friction coefficient. However, this model also showed the highest materials removal rate.

Keywords

tribologyceramicmetal
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 58-59: Nanomaterials , 2017 , pp. 3571 - 3576
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES:

Li, N., Wang, H., Misra, A., and Wang, J., Sci. Rep. 4, 6633 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, D., Mara, N.A., Dickerson, P., Hoagland, R.G., and Misra, A., Acta Mater. 59, 3804 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillmann, W. and Vogli, E., Adv. Eng. Mater. 10, 79 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillmann, W., Vogli, E., Gathen, M., and Momeni, S., J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209, 4268 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, P.M., Foecke, T., and Hazzledine, P.M., MRS Bull. 24, 27 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Y., Abad, O.T., Wang, F., Huang, P., Lu, T.-J., Xu, K.-W., and Wang, J., Sci. Rep. 6, 23306 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vac, J.. Sci. Technol. Vac. Surf. Films 23, 90 (2004).Google Scholar
Nix, W.D., Math. Mech. Solids 14, 207 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I., Wang, J., Bahr, D.F., and Zbib, H.M., Int. J. Plast. 59, 119 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I., Mastorakos, I., and Zbib, H.M., Appl. Surf. Sci. 401, 198 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, W., Ayoub, G., Salehinia, I., Mansoor, B., and Zbib, H., Acta Mater. 122, 99 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I., Shao, S., Wang, J., and Zbib, H.M., Acta Mater. 86, 331 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, K., Matthews, A., and Ronkainen, H., Tribol. Int. 31, 107 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lackner, J., Major, L., and Kot, M., Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 59, 343 (2011).Google Scholar
Leyland, A. and Matthews, A., Surf. Coat. Technol. 70, 19 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, A. and Eskildsen, S.S., Diam. Relat. Mater. 3, 902 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, K.S., He, M.Y., and Hutchinson, J.W., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 167, 57 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, M.Y., Evans, A.G., and Hutchinson, J.W., Int. J. Solids Struct. 31, 3443 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Embury, J.D. and Hirth, J.P., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 2051 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farhat, Z.N., Ding, Y., Northwood, D.O., and Alpas, A.T., Surf. Coat. Technol. 89, 24 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D.R.P. and Chawla, N., J. Mater. Res. 27, 278 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plimpton, S., Comput, J.. Phys. 117, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
Lee, B.-J., Baskes, M.I., Kim, H., and Koo Cho, Y., Phys. Rev. B 64, 184102 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salehinia, I., Shao, S., Wang, J., and Zbib, H.M., JOM 66, 2078 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damadam, M., Shao, S., Salehinia, I., Ayoub, G., and Zbib, H.M., Mater. Res. Lett. DOI: 10.1080/21663831.2016.1275864 (2017).Google Scholar
Wang, J. and Misra, A., Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 18, 19 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stukowski, A., Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar