Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:54:40.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Catalytic Conducting Polymer Electrodes in Biofuel Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2018

Keiichi Kaneto*
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka, 535-8585, JAPAN
Mao Nishikawa
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka, 535-8585, JAPAN
Sadahito Uto
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Osaka Institute of Technology, Osaka, 535-8585, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Catalytic activity of conducting polymers in biofuel cells has been studied in comparison with the performance of Pt-black (Pt-B). The cells were direct and passive type with structure of biofuel/anode catalyst/Nafion®/cathode catalyst/air. Conducting polymers of polyaniline, polypyrrole and poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT*PSS) were examined for the anode and cathode catalysts. L-ascorbic acid was used as the biofuel, and the Nafion® was served as a proton transfer membrane. In the standard Pt-B anode/Pt-B cathode cell, the typical Voc (open circuit voltage) = 0.52 V, ISC (short circuit current) = 8 mA/cm2 and the Pmax (maximum power density) of approximately 0.8 mW/cm2 were obtained. In a cell with catalysts of PEDOT*PSS anode/Pt-B cathode, Voc = 0.55 V and the maximum power density of 1.2 mW/cm2 were obtained, which were larger than that of the standard Pt-B/Pt-B cell. Polyaniline and Polypyrrole were also found to be a potential candidate for catalysts in biofuel cells.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Liu, H., Song, C., Zhang, L., Zhang, J., Wang, H., and Wilkinson, D.P., J. Power Sources, 155, 95110 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, N., Yamazaki, S., and Yasuda, K., J. Jpn. Petroleum Institute, 54, 237247 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fujiwara, N., Yamazaki, S., Siroma, Z., Ioroi, T., and Yasuda, K., J. Power Sources, 167, 3238 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, Y.W., Daud, W.R.W., Mohamad, A.B., Kadhum, A.A.H., Loh, K.S., and Majlan, E.H., Int’l J. of Hydrogen Energy, 38, 93709386 (2013).Google Scholar
Kuwarara, T., Ohta, H., Kondo, M., and Shimomura, M., Bioelectrochemistry, 74, 6672 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contractor, A.Q., Sureshkumar, T.N., Narayanen, R., Sukeerthi, S., Lal, R., and Srinivasa, R.S., Electrochimica Acta, 39, 13211324 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajesh, V. Bisht, W. Takashima, , and Kaneto, K., Biometerials, 26, 36833690 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDiarmid, A.G., Somasiri, N.D.L., Mu, S.L., Wu, W.Q., Chiang, J.-C, Huang, W.S., and Halpern, M., Electrochemical Society Extended Abstract, 84-2, 906907 (1984).Google Scholar
Takashima, W., Pandey, S.S., and Kaneto, K., Thin Solid Films, 438-439, 339345 (2003).Google Scholar
Kaneto, K., Hata, F., and Uto, S., J. Micromech. and Microeng. (2018) to be published.Google Scholar