Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:37:44.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlled Drug Release Formulation by Sequential Crosslinking of Multilayered Electrospun Gelatin Nanofiber Mat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Anindita Laha ,
Saptarshi Majumdar  and
Chandra S Sharma
Anindita Laha
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi-502285, Telangana, INDIA
Saptarshi Majumdar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi-502285, Telangana, INDIA
Chandra S Sharma*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad, Kandi-502285, Telangana, INDIA
*
*(Email: cssharma@iith.ac.in)
Get access

Abstract

The major aim of the present study is to develop and explore the potential of large surface area electrospun polymer nanofabric as a carrier for controlled and sustained release, in particular for hydrophobic drugs. Gelatin (type A), FDA approved natural polymer was electrospun in a mixture of solvent (20% acetic acid in water) to yield long, continuous and uniform fibers with average diameter ∼ 200 nm. Piperine was chosen as a model hydrophobic drug in this study. As gelatin is highly soluble in aqueous medium, we crosslinked electrospun gelatin nanofibers using saturated GTA vapor to increase the water resistive properties. For controlled release over a period of 12 h, we devised several strategies to vary the crosslinking conditions and accordingly understand their effect on drug release mechanism. One of such successful efforts was based on deposition of multiple layers of electrospun fabric by sandwiching between drug loaded gelatin nanofibers and without drug gelatin nanofibers from both sides. Not only the layer by layer deposition, we also crosslinked the different layer in the same sequential way. Sequential crosslinking using GTA vapor in different layers of the fabric, helped in uniform crosslinking throughout the thickness compared to crosslinking after final deposition in the form of a single layer. Effect of different crosslinking strategies was investigated in terms of surface morphology and drug stability. Finally, in-vitro release study was performed maintaining the physiological conditions mimicking GI tract to analyze the effect of crosslinking on the drug release profile. The in-vitro studies concluded that the controlled drug release can be achieved by tuning the thickness of individual fabric layer followed by their sequential crosslinking, which finally affects the diffusional barrier for drug release. Interestingly, we also found that only 6 min exposure to saturated GTA vapor is sufficient to provide the required drug release in contrast to up to 24 h as reported in literature. This finding also addresses the toxicity problem associated with the use of GTA as a cross-linker.

Keywords

nanostructurebiomaterialdiffusion
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 29: Soft Materials and Biomaterials , 2016 , pp. 2107 - 2113
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Langer, R. S., Peppas, NA, Biomaterials. 2, 201–214 (1981).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kumari, A., Yadav, S.K, Yadav, S.C, Colloids Surf. B 75, 1–18 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoare, T.R, Kohane, D.S, Polymer 49, 1993–2007 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laha, A., Bhutani, U., Mitra, K., Majumdar, S., Mater. Manuf.Processes. 31, 223–230 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhutani, U., Laha, A., Mitra, K., Majumdar, S., Mater Lett. 164,76–79 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Narang, A.S., Delmarre, D., Gao, D., Int. J. Pharm. 345, 9–25 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Z.M., Zhang, Y.Z., Kotaki, M., Ramakrishna, S., Compos. Sci. Technol. 63, 2223–2253 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna, S., Fujihara, K., Teo, W.E., Lim, T.C., Ma, Z., An Introduction to Electrospinning and Nano-fibers, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 22-154 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, D., Li, Y., Nie, J., Carbohydr. Polym. 69, 538–543 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y.Z., Venugopal, J., Huang, Z.M., Lim, C.T., Ramakrishna, S., Polymer 47, 2911–2917(2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farris, S., Song, J., Huang, Q., J. Agric. Food Chem. 58, 998–1003 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laha, A., Yadav, S., Majumdar, S., Sharma, C.S., Biochem. Eng. J. 105, 481–488 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aduba, D.C. Jr., Hammer, J. A., Yuan, Q., Yeudall, W. A., Bowlin, G. L., Yang, H., Acta Biomater 9, 6576–6584 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, W., Ma, M., Xu, H., Zhang, B., Cao, X., Guo, Y., MaterialsLetters 140, 1–4 (2015).Google Scholar