Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:58:14.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coupled Granular/Continuous Media – Results and Challenges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2017

Horia Gavrila  and
Doina Elena Gavrila
Horia Gavrila*
Affiliation:
“Politehnica” University of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, Bucharest060042, Romania
Doina Elena Gavrila
Affiliation:
“Politehnica” University of Bucharest, 313 Splaiul Independentei, Bucharest060042, Romania
*
*(Email: horia.gavrila@upb.ro)
Get access

Abstract

While the most promising longitudinal recording systems cannot surpass the theoretical limit of about 200 Gb/in2 for areal recording density and the demand for higher densities is permanently increasing, the perpendicular magnetic recording constitutes the realistic issue to the longitudinal one. The perpendicular magnetic recording offers significant advantages, the most important being stronger write and read fields, and therefore the use of media of higher anisotropy, smaller grain size, higher signal-to-noise ratio, and a better thermal stability. Unfortunately, the perpendicular recording has to cope some important physical and technological difficulties. To overcome them, many ingenious solutions were proposed. In this paper the coupled granular/continuous (CGC) media, a subtle association of the continuous and, respectively, granular media, are analysed from the viewpoint of their magnetic and recording properties. The challenges and possible improvements of CGC media are discussed.

Keywords

Magnetic propertiesNanostructureMicroelectronics
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 49: International Materials Research Congress XXV , 2017 , pp. 2661 - 2668
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gavrila, H., J. Optoelectronics and Adv. Materials 6, 891 (2004).Google Scholar
Bertram, H.N. and Williams, M., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 36, 4 (2000).Google Scholar
Richter, H. J., Dobin, A.Y., Lynch, R.T., Weller, D. and Brockie, R.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 222512–1 (2006).Google Scholar
Gavrila, H., Magnetic Recording (in Romanian), Printech, Bucharest, 2005.Google Scholar
Olson, T., Lengsfield, B., Parker, G.J., Shiimoto, M., Sugyama, M. and Lei Xu, , I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 52, 3000108 (2016).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Weller, D., Ikeda, Y., Takano, K., Zeltzer, G., Yen, B.K. and Best, M.E., J.M.M.M. 235, 424 (2001)Google Scholar
Gavrila, H., Proc. Romanian Acad., Series A, 11,.41 (2010).Google Scholar
Miura, K., Muraoka, H., Y.Sonobe, and Nakamura, Y., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 38, 2054 (2002).Google Scholar
Goodman, A.M., Muraoka, H., Greaves, S.J., Miura, K., Sonobe, Y. and Nakamura, Y., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 39, 685 (2003).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Tham, K.K., Umezawa, T., Takatsu, C., Dumaya, J.A. and Leo, P.Y., J.M.M.M. 303, 292 (2006).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Weller, D., Ikeda, Y., Schabes, M.E., Takano, K., Zeltzer, G., Yen, B.K., Best, M.E., Graves, S.J., Muraoka, H. and Nakamura, Y., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 37, 1667 (2001).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Muraoka, H., Miura, K., Nakamura, Y., Takano, K., Do, H., Moser, A., Yen, B.K., Ikeda, Y. and Supper, N., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 8055 (2002).Google Scholar
Shimatsu, T., Muraoka, H., Nakamura, Y., Sonobe, Y., Satodate, Y., Muramatsu, K. and Watanabe, I., J. Appl. Phys. 91, 8061 (2002).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Muraoka, H., Miura, K., Nakamura, Y., Takano, K., Moser, A., Do, H., Yen, B.K., Ikeda, Y., Supper, N. and Weresin, W., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 38, 2006 (2002).Google Scholar
Sonobe, Y., Tham, K.K., Wu, J., Umezawa, T., Takatsu, C., Dumaya, J.A.H., Onoue, T., Leo, P.Y. and Liau, M., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 42, 2351 (2006).Google Scholar
Richter, H.J., Choe, G. and Terris, B.D., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 47, 4769 (2011).Google Scholar
Zhu, J. and Tang, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 99, 2006 (2001).Google Scholar
Suess, D., Lee, J., Fiedler, J., Jung, H.S., Velu, E.M.T., Jiang, W., Malhotra, S.S., Bertero, G. and Schrefl, T., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 45, 88 (2009).Google Scholar
Skomski, R., Yan, M.L., Xu, Y.F. and Sellmyer, D.J., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 43, 2163 (2007).Google Scholar
Muraoka, H., Sonobe, Y., Miura, K., Goodman, A.M., Nakamura, Y., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 38, 1632 (2002).Google Scholar
Gavrila, H., J. Optoelectronics and Adv. Materials 8, 449 (2006).Google Scholar
Yasumori, J., Sonobe, Y., Braves, S.J. and Tham, K.K., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 45, 850 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aniya, M., Mitra, A., Shimada, A., Sonobe, Y., Graves, S.J. and Homma, T., I.E.E.E. Trans. Magn. 45, 3539 (2009).Google Scholar