Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:01:29.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deposition and Characterization of CNT-Polyurethane Nanocomposite Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Nagendra K.C. Tummalapalli ,
Amila C. Dissanayake ,
Asghar Kayani ,
Valery Bliznyuk  and
M. Ghantasala
Nagendra K.C. Tummalapalli*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
Amila C. Dissanayake
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
Asghar Kayani
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
Valery Bliznyuk
Affiliation:
Department of Material Science and Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
M. Ghantasala
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
*
*(Email: tnkchaitu@gmail.com)
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents the results of our studies on the deposition and characterization of multi wall carbon nanotube films in combination with polyurethane (PU) and N-methyl- 2-pyrrolidone (NMP). These studies mainly focused on the effect of ultra violet Ozone plasma treatment on the on the contact angle and wettability characteristics of the substrates, Silicon and Polyimide. Polyurethane/ multi-walled carbon nanotube elastomer composite films are synthesized on polyimide and glass substrates using spin coating methods. The effect of Ultraviolet-Ozone Plasma treatment (UVO) on the wettability of the substrate was studied after different exposure times, by making contact angle measurements on the chosen substrates. These measurements showed that the contact angle decreases with increasing exposure times, which indicated enhanced wettability after longer exposure to UVO plasma. The microstructure of these films are examined using optical and scanning electron microscopes. The conductivities of the films are examined using Van der Pauw method. The AC conductivity of 1wt%, 5wt% and 8wt% CNT loaded PU nanocomposite films were found to be 3.86, 5.90 and 5.38 S/m respectively which are few orders higher than the values reported in the literature. These values were confirmed with the Nyquist plot and equivalent circuit modelling. This shows the frequency independent conductive nature of the composite films. The quality of these films is analyzed using Laser Raman spectroscopy. The effect of substrate (Polyimide or Glass), UVO exposure (Ultraviolet-Ozone plasma treatment, carbon nanotube loading (1-8%) on the quality of the films are presented in detail in this paper.

Keywords

nanoscaleRaman spectroscopyfilm
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 1: Nanomaterials , 2017 , pp. 39 - 44
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Shang, S., Li, L., Yang, X., and Wei, Y., “Polymethylmethacrylate-carbon nanotubes composites prepared by microemulsion polymerization for gas sensor,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 69, no. 7–8, pp. 1156–1159, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, D. E., Lin, Y., Rao, A. M., Allard, L. F., and Sun, Y. P., “Functionalization of carbon nanotubes with polystyrene,” Macromolecules, vol. 35, no. 25, pp. 9466–9471, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, T., Phang, I. Y., Shen, L., Chow, S. Y., and De Zhang, W., “Morphology and mechanical properties of multiwalled carbon nanotubes reinforced nylon-6 composites,” Macromolecules, vol. 37, no. 19, pp. 7214–7222, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baibarac, M., Baltog, I., Lefrant, S., Mevellec, J. Y., and Chauvet, O., “Polyaniline and Carbon Nanotubes Based Composites Containing Whole Units and Fragments of Nanotubes,” Chem. Mater., vol. 15, no. 21, pp. 4149–4156, 2003.Google Scholar
Kanagaraj, S., Varanda, F. R., Zhil’tsova, T. V., Oliveira, M. S. A., and Simões, J. A. O., “Mechanical properties of high density polyethylene/carbon nanotube composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 67, no. 15–16, pp. 3071–3077, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tijing, L. D., Park, C. H., Choi, W. L., Ruelo, M. T. G., Amarjargal, A., Pant, H. R., Im, I. T., and Kim, C. S., “Characterization and mechanical performance comparison of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polyurethane composites fabricated by electrospinning and solution casting,” Compos. Part B Eng., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 613–619, 2013.Google Scholar
Chen, W., Tao, X., Xue, P., and Cheng, X., “Enhanced mechanical properties and morphological characterizations of poly(vinyl alcohol)-carbon nanotube composite films,” Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 252, no. 5, pp. 1404–1409, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaisman, L., Wagner, H. D., and Marom, G., “The role of surfactants in dispersion of carbon nanotubes,” Advances in Colloid and Interface Science. 2006.Google Scholar
Mathieson, I. and Bradley, R. H., “Improved adhesion to polymers by UV / ozone surface oxidation,” vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 29–31, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuriel, S., Liu, L., Barber, A. H., and Wagner, H. D., “Direct measurement of multiwall nanotube surface tension,” Chem. Phys. Lett., vol. 404, no. 4–6, pp. 263–266, 2005.Google Scholar
Yoo, H. J., Jung, Y. C., Sahoo, N. G., and Cho, J. W., “Polyurethane - Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites Prepared by In - Situ Polymerization with Electroactive Shape Memory Polyurethane-Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites Prepared by In-Situ Polymerization with Electroactive Shape Memory,” vol. 2348, no. November 2016, 2006.Google Scholar
Bokobza, L. and Zhang, J., “Raman spectroscopic characterization of multiwall carbon nanotubes and of composites,” Express Polym. Lett., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 601–608, 2012.Google Scholar
McLachlan, D. S., Chiteme, C., Park, C., Wise, K. E., Lowther, S. E., Lillehei, P. T., Siochi, E. J., and Harrison, J. S., “AC and DC percolative conductivity of single wall carbon nanotube polymer composites,” J. Polym. Sci. Part B Polym. Phys., vol. 43, no. 22, pp. 3273–3287, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, J. K. W., Kirk, J. E., Kinloch, I. A., Shaffer, M. S. P., and Windle, A. H., “Ultra-low electrical percolation threshold in carbon-nanotube-epoxy composites,” Polymer (Guildf)., vol. 44, no. 19, pp. 5893–5899, 2003.Google Scholar