Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:19:12.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Graphenic Nanocomposite Barrier Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Ken Bosnick*
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology, National Research Council Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Nathalie Chapleau
Affiliation:
Automotive and Surface Transportation Portfolio, National Research Council Canada, Boucherville, QC, Canada
Michel Champagne
Affiliation:
Automotive and Surface Transportation Portfolio, National Research Council Canada, Boucherville, QC, Canada
Adam Bergren
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology, National Research Council Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Abdelkader Benhalima
Affiliation:
Automotive and Surface Transportation Portfolio, National Research Council Canada, Boucherville, QC, Canada
Steve Launspach
Affiliation:
National Institute for Nanotechnology, National Research Council Canada, Edmonton, AB, Canada
*
Get access

Abstract

The use of modern graphenic materials for improving oxygen barriers in food packaging and anti-corrosion barriers in coatings is explored by compounding and casting graphene nanoplatelets (GNP) with polyethylene (PE) and epoxy (EP). The GNP / PE films show comparable oxygen transmission rates to the neat PE films, indicating that further processing will be necessary to realize the desired enhancements. Early corrosion tests indicate that the GNP / EP coatings are providing more protection than the neat EP coatings on steel. Experiments to expand on these results are underway.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gokhale, A.A., Lee, I., J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 14(3), 2157 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, A., Padua, G.W., J. Food Sci. 75(1), R43 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, Y., Kundalwal, S.I., Kumar, S., Carbon 98, 313 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, T., Wolodko, J., Tsaprailis, H., CORROSION 2016 paper no. 7488, (2016).Google Scholar
NACE International 55(8), 48 (2016). Available at http://www.albertatechfutures.ca/Portals/0/documents/Petroleum/CoatingsAndLiningsAug2016_2.pdf (accessed 4 November 2016).Google Scholar
Yang, C., Wei, H., Guan, L., Guo, J., Wang, Y., Yan, X., Zhang, X., Wei, S., Guo, Z., J. Mater. Chem. A 3, 14929 (2015).Google Scholar
Ramezanzadeh, B., Niroumandrad, S., Ahmadi, A., Mahdavian, M., Mohamadzadeh Moghadam, M.H., Corrosion Sci. 103, 283 (2016).Google Scholar
Liu, D., Zhao, W., Liu, S., Cen, Q., Xue, Q., Surf. Coat. Tech. 286, 354 (2016).Google Scholar
Mo, M., Zhao, W., Chen, Z., Yu, Q., Zeng, Z., Wu, X., Xue, Q., RSC Adv. 5, 56486 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y.H., Lin, Y.Y., Lin, C.H., Chana, C.C., Huanga, Y.C., Polym. Chem. 5, 535 (2014).Google Scholar
ASTM Standard G3 (2014). Available at https://www.astm.org/Standards/G3.htm (accessed 4 November 2016).Google Scholar